Suppr超能文献

在理论与实践中整合心理健康与社会发展。

Integrating mental health and social development in theory and practice.

作者信息

Plagerson Sophie

机构信息

Centre for Social Development in Africa, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2015 Mar;30(2):163-70. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt107. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

Abstract

In many low and middle income countries, attention to mental illness remains compartmentalized and consigned as a matter for specialist policy. Despite great advances in global mental health, mental health policy and practice dovetail only to a limited degree with social development efforts. They often lag behind broader approaches to health and development. This gap ignores the small but growing evidence that social development unavoidably impacts the mental health of those affected, and that this influence can be both positive and negative. This article examines the theoretical and practical challenges that need to be overcome for a more effective integration of social development and mental health policy. From a theoretical perspective, this article demonstrates compatibility between social development and mental health paradigms. In particular, the capability approach is shown to provide a strong framework for integrating mental health and development. Yet, capability-oriented critiques on 'happiness' have recently been applied to mental health with potentially detrimental outcomes. With regard to policy and practice, horizontal and vertical integration strategies are suggested. Horizontal strategies require stronger devolution of mental health care to the primary care level, more unified messages regarding mental health care provision and the gradual expansion of mental health packages of care. Vertical integration refers to the alignment of mental health with related policy domains (particularly the social, economic and political domains). Evidence from mental health research reinforces aspects of social development theory in a way that can have tangible implications on practice. First, it encourages a focus on avoiding exclusion of those affected by or at risk of mental illness. Secondly, it underscores the importance of the process of implementation as an integral component of successful policies. Finally, by retaining a focus on the individual, it seeks to avoid uneven approaches to development.

摘要

在许多低收入和中等收入国家,对精神疾病的关注仍然处于分割状态,并被视为专家政策范畴内的事务。尽管全球精神卫生取得了巨大进展,但精神卫生政策与实践仅在有限程度上与社会发展努力相契合。它们往往落后于更广泛的卫生与发展方法。这种差距忽视了虽少但不断增加的证据,即社会发展不可避免地会影响受其影响者的心理健康,而且这种影响可能是积极的,也可能是消极的。本文探讨了为更有效地整合社会发展与精神卫生政策而需要克服的理论和实践挑战。从理论角度来看,本文论证了社会发展与精神卫生范式之间的兼容性。特别是,能力方法被证明为整合精神卫生与发展提供了一个强有力的框架。然而,最近针对“幸福”的以能力为导向的批评已被应用于精神卫生领域,可能会产生有害后果。在政策和实践方面,建议采用横向和纵向整合策略。横向策略要求将精神卫生保健更有力地下放至初级保健层面,就精神卫生保健服务提供发出更统一的信息,并逐步扩大精神卫生保健套餐。纵向整合是指将精神卫生与相关政策领域(特别是社会、经济和政治领域)相结合。精神卫生研究的证据以一种对实践可能产生切实影响的方式强化了社会发展理论的各个方面。首先,它鼓励关注避免排斥那些受精神疾病影响或有精神疾病风险的人。其次,它强调实施过程作为成功政策不可或缺组成部分的重要性。最后,通过始终关注个体,它力求避免不均衡的发展方式。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验