J van Rensburg André, Brooke-Sumner Carrie
Centre for Rural Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2023 Mar 15;10:e19. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.10. eCollection 2023.
The needs of people with severe mental illness are complex and require a range of services embedded in well-coordinated systems of care to enable recovery, promote well-being and optimise social integration. The concept of recovery is strongly rooted in the centrality of multi and intersectoral systems of care, and, while multi and -intersectoral dimensions of mental health systems have been highlighted in analyses focusing on high-income regions, little has been elaborated in terms of these approaches in the recovery of people with severe mental illness (SMI) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this review was to identify and describe multi and intersectoral approaches underpinning community-based SMI recovery interventions in LMICs. A scoping review was carried out following the following steps: (1) Objectives for the review were developed and refined; (2) A systematic search of databases (EbscoHost, PubMed, Google Scholar) and previous reviews were undertaken from 2012 to 2022, where relevant papers were identified; (3) Papers with a focus on SMI and recovery, a specific description of an intervention, located in LMICs, with explicit linkages between sectors, and published in English, were selected for inclusion; (4) Data were extracted and charted and (5) Findings were analysed and reported thematically. Thirty-six papers were included for analysis, from 18 countries, including qualitative studies, trials, desktop and secondary data reviews and case studies. Examples of multi- and intersectoral action included collaboration between healthcare and community support systems, collaboration in providing supported housing and supportive community spaces for recovery, and linkages between biomedical and social spheres of care. Barriers included the dominance of mental health professions in delivering care, community-based stigmatising attitudes towards SMI. Multi- and intersectoral collaboration for SMI recovery requires investments in financing, education and coordination by a governing body.
重度精神疾病患者的需求复杂多样,需要一系列服务融入协调良好的照护体系,以实现康复、促进福祉并优化社会融合。康复理念深深扎根于多部门和跨部门照护体系的核心地位。虽然在聚焦高收入地区的分析中突出了精神卫生系统的多部门和跨部门层面,但在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),针对重度精神疾病(SMI)患者康复的这些方法却鲜有阐述。本综述的目的是识别和描述低收入和中等收入国家基于社区的重度精神疾病康复干预措施所依据的多部门和跨部门方法。按照以下步骤进行了范围综述:(1)制定并完善综述目标;(2)对数据库(EbscoHost、PubMed、谷歌学术)进行系统检索,并检索2012年至2022年期间的既往综述,以识别相关论文;(3)选择聚焦于重度精神疾病和康复、对干预措施有具体描述、位于低收入和中等收入国家、各部门之间有明确联系且以英文发表的论文纳入;(4)提取数据并绘制图表;(5)对结果进行分析并按主题报告。纳入36篇论文进行分析,来自18个国家,包括定性研究、试验、桌面研究、二手数据综述和案例研究。多部门和跨部门行动的例子包括医疗保健与社区支持系统之间的合作、在提供支持性住房和促进康复的支持性社区空间方面的合作,以及生物医学和社会照护领域之间的联系。障碍包括精神卫生专业人员在提供照护方面占主导地位、社区对重度精神疾病存在污名化态度。重度精神疾病康复的多部门合作需要管理机构在资金、教育和协调方面进行投入。