Seo Jae Young, Kim Eun-Kyung, Kwak Jin Young
Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.
Endocrine. 2014 Sep;47(1):283-9. doi: 10.1007/s12020-013-0150-5. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
The BRAF(V600E) mutation test has been more effective in thyroid nodules with suspicious US features than ones without suspicious features. Therefore, we investigated the role of the BRAF(V600E) mutation as an additional study to cytology in diagnosing a thyroid nodule without suspicious US features. This study was performed at Severance hospital from December 2010 through February 2012. During this period, 2,650 patients with 2,918 nodules underwent FNA with an additional BRAF(V600E) mutation test. Among them, we excluded thyroid nodules with suspicious US features. Finally, 485 thyroid nodules in 466 patients (mean age 50.3 years; range 9-80 years) were included in this study. We compared the differences between patients with malignant and benign thyroid nodules. We evaluated the detection rates of the BRAF(V600E) mutation according to the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC). There were 60 (60/485, 12.4 %) malignant and 425 (425/485, 87.6 %) benign nodules. The detection rate of the BRAF(V600E) mutation in thyroid nodules without suspicious US features was only 6.6 % (32/485). Most had malignant cytology (62.5 %, 20/32). For nodules without malignant cytology, only 12 nodules (2.6 %, 12/462) had the BRAF mutation. Among the 12 nodules, nine nodules were suspicious for malignancy on cytology. Additional BRAF mutation analysis shows additional diagnostic value in thyroid nodules with "suspicious for malignant" cytology alone even when the nodules do not show suspicious US features. Therefore, the test should be selectively performed in thyroid nodules without suspicious US features, considering cost-effectiveness as well as diagnostic accuracy.
BRAF(V600E)突变检测在具有可疑超声特征的甲状腺结节中比在没有可疑特征的结节中更有效。因此,我们研究了BRAF(V600E)突变作为细胞学检查之外的一项补充检查在诊断没有可疑超声特征的甲状腺结节中的作用。本研究于2010年12月至2012年2月在首尔延世大学Severance医院进行。在此期间,2650例患者的2918个结节接受了细针穿刺活检(FNA)并额外进行了BRAF(V600E)突变检测。其中,我们排除了具有可疑超声特征的甲状腺结节。最终,本研究纳入了466例患者的485个甲状腺结节(平均年龄50.3岁;范围9 - 80岁)。我们比较了甲状腺恶性结节和良性结节患者之间的差异。我们根据甲状腺细胞病理学报告的贝塞斯达系统(BSRTC)评估了BRAF(V600E)突变的检出率。有60个(60/485,12.4%)恶性结节和425个(425/485,87.6%)良性结节。没有可疑超声特征的甲状腺结节中BRAF(V600E)突变的检出率仅为6.6%(32/485)。大多数具有恶性细胞学特征(62.5%,20/32)。对于没有恶性细胞学特征的结节,只有12个结节(2.6%,12/462)有BRAF突变。在这12个结节中‘,9个结节在细胞学上可疑为恶性。额外的BRAF突变分析显示,即使结节没有可疑的超声特征,对于仅具有“可疑恶性”细胞学特征的甲状腺结节也具有额外的诊断价值。因此,考虑到成本效益和诊断准确性,对于没有可疑超声特征的甲状腺结节应选择性地进行该检测。