eHealth Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
eHealth Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom ; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 16;9(1):e77669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077669. eCollection 2014.
To investigate the perceptions and reported practices of mental health hospital staff using national hospital electronic health records (EHRs) in order to inform future implementations, particularly in acute mental health settings.
Thematic analysis of interviews with a wide range of clinical, information technology (IT), managerial and other staff at two early adopter mental health National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in London, UK, implementing national EHRs.
We analysed 33 interviews. We first sought out examples of workarounds, such as delayed data entry, entering data in wrong places and individuals using the EHR while logged in as a colleague, then identified possible reasons for the reported workarounds. Our analysis identified four main categories of factors contributing to workarounds (i.e., operational, cultural, organisational and technical). Operational factors included poor system integration with existing workflows and the system not meeting users' perceived needs. Cultural factors involved users' competence with IT and resistance to change. Organisational factors referred to insufficient organisational resources and training, while technical factors included inadequate local technical infrastructure. Many of these factors, such as integrating the EHR system with day-to-day operational processes, staff training and adequate local IT infrastructure, were likely to apply to system implementations in various settings, but we also identified factors that related particularly to implementing EHRs in mental health hospitals, for example: EHR system incompatibility with IT systems used by mental health-related sectors, notably social services; the EHR system lacking specific, mental health functionalities and options; and clinicians feeling unable to use computers while attending to distressed psychiatric patients.
A better conceptual model of reasons for workarounds should help with designing, and supporting the implementation and adoption of, EHRs for use in hospital mental health settings.
调查精神卫生医院工作人员使用国家医院电子健康记录(EHR)的认知和报告实践,以便为未来的实施提供信息,特别是在急性精神卫生环境中。
对英国伦敦两家早期采用国家 EHR 的精神卫生国民保健服务(NHS)医院的广泛临床、信息技术(IT)、管理和其他工作人员进行了主题分析访谈。
我们分析了 33 次访谈。我们首先寻找了一些解决方法的例子,例如数据输入延迟、在错误的地方输入数据以及个人在登录为同事的情况下使用 EHR,然后确定了报告的解决方法的可能原因。我们的分析确定了导致解决方法的四个主要因素类别(即操作、文化、组织和技术)。操作因素包括与现有工作流程的系统集成不良以及系统不符合用户的感知需求。文化因素涉及用户对 IT 的能力和对变革的抵制。组织因素涉及组织资源和培训不足,而技术因素包括当地技术基础设施不足。这些因素中的许多因素,例如将 EHR 系统与日常运营流程集成、员工培训和充足的当地 IT 基础设施,可能适用于各种环境中的系统实施,但我们也确定了与在精神卫生医院实施 EHR 特别相关的因素,例如:EHR 系统与精神卫生相关部门(尤其是社会服务)使用的 IT 系统不兼容;EHR 系统缺乏特定的、心理健康功能和选项;以及临床医生在照顾精神疾病患者时感到无法使用计算机。
更好的解决方法原因概念模型将有助于设计、支持和采用在医院精神卫生环境中使用的 EHR。