• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从使用、价值和以用户为中心的设计到情境:医院电子病历增强的混合方法分析

From use, value and user-centered design to context: A mixed methods analysis of a hospital electronic medical record enhancement.

作者信息

Robertson Samantha T, Brauer Sandra G, Burton-Jones Andrew, Grimley Rohan S, Rosbergen Ingrid Cm

机构信息

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Sep 28;10:20552076241279208. doi: 10.1177/20552076241279208. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076241279208
PMID:39372815
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11450561/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to determine the use and perceived value of a user-centered electronic medical record (EMR) enhancement for stroke care and understand if its value was in alignment with its intended design. The EMR enhancement was introduced into Queensland public hospitals in Australia and included a summary page for enhanced interprofessional collaboration and data collection forms for efficient data extraction.

METHODS

A mixed methods design was adopted and data collected from four hospital sites. We conducted 15 semistructured interviews with multidisciplinary end-users across participating sites and analyzed this data using inductive thematic techniques. Usage log data was extracted from the EMR to determine its use.

RESULTS

Relative use of the summary page showed moderate use, varying from 66 ± 22.5 uses for each stroke patient admission per month (Site 1) to 26.7 ± 9.1 (Site 2). Interviews identified key themes of "visibility" and providing a "quick snapshot" of patient data as the main positive attributes. Technology "functionality" was perceived negatively. Use of the data collection forms was minimal, with inconsistency across sites: (Site 3, 0% to Site 2, 47%). Negative themes of "inefficiency," poor "functionality" and the "trust" required in data entry practices were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its user-centered design, clinicians did not always use the enhancement in line with its intended design, or grasp its intended value. Our findings highlight the challenges of user-centered design to accurately reflect clinical workflows within different contexts. A greater understanding is required of how to optimize user-centered EMR design for specific hospital contexts.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定以用户为中心的电子病历(EMR)增强功能在中风护理中的使用情况和感知价值,并了解其价值是否与预期设计相符。该EMR增强功能已引入澳大利亚昆士兰州的公立医院,包括用于加强跨专业协作的摘要页面和用于高效数据提取的数据收集表。

方法

采用混合方法设计,从四个医院站点收集数据。我们对参与站点的多学科最终用户进行了15次半结构化访谈,并使用归纳主题技术分析了这些数据。从EMR中提取使用日志数据以确定其使用情况。

结果

摘要页面的相对使用情况显示使用程度适中,每月每位中风患者入院的使用次数从66±22.5次(站点1)到26.7±9.1次(站点2)不等。访谈确定了“可见性”和提供患者数据“快速快照”作为主要积极属性的关键主题。技术“功能”被认为是负面的。数据收集表的使用很少,各站点之间存在不一致:(站点3为0%,站点2为47%)。发现了“效率低下”、“功能”不佳以及数据录入操作中需要“信任”等负面主题。

结论

尽管其设计以用户为中心,但临床医生并不总是按照预期设计使用该增强功能,也没有领会其预期价值。我们的研究结果凸显了以用户为中心的设计在准确反映不同背景下临床工作流程方面的挑战。需要更深入地了解如何针对特定医院背景优化以用户为中心的EMR设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f5/11450561/8654d9c2738d/10.1177_20552076241279208-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f5/11450561/410f9e12780a/10.1177_20552076241279208-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f5/11450561/8654d9c2738d/10.1177_20552076241279208-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f5/11450561/410f9e12780a/10.1177_20552076241279208-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34f5/11450561/8654d9c2738d/10.1177_20552076241279208-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
From use, value and user-centered design to context: A mixed methods analysis of a hospital electronic medical record enhancement.从使用、价值和以用户为中心的设计到情境:医院电子病历增强的混合方法分析
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 28;10:20552076241279208. doi: 10.1177/20552076241279208. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
An Approach to Potentially Increasing Adoption of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electronic Medical Record Encounter in Canadian Primary Care: Protocol for a User-Centered Design.一种提高加拿大初级保健中人工智能电子病历采用率的方法:一项以用户为中心的设计方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jul 18;13:e54365. doi: 10.2196/54365.
3
Going digital: a checklist in preparing for hospital-wide electronic medical record implementation and digital transformation.走向数字化:医院全面实施电子病历及数字化转型的准备清单。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jul;43(3):302-313. doi: 10.1071/AH17153.
4
User-Centered Design and Usability of Voxe as a Pediatric Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Platform: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.以用户为中心的设计与可用性研究:Voxe 作为儿科电子患者报告结局测量平台的混合方法评估研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 19;11:e57984. doi: 10.2196/57984.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Strategies used to detect and mitigate system-related errors over time: A qualitative study in an Australian health district.随着时间的推移,用于检测和减轻系统相关错误的策略:在澳大利亚一个卫生区的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 24;24(1):839. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11309-0.
7
User-Centered Design of a Digitally Enabled Care Pathway in a Large Health System: Qualitative Interview Study.大型医疗系统中以患者为中心的数字化护理路径设计:定性访谈研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jul 26;10:e42768. doi: 10.2196/42768.
8
Clinical Needs Assessment of a Machine Learning-Based Asthma Management Tool: User-Centered Design Approach.基于机器学习的哮喘管理工具的临床需求评估:以用户为中心的设计方法。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 15;8:e45391. doi: 10.2196/45391.
9
Evaluating the Usability and Perceived Impact of an Electronic Medical Record Toolkit for Atrial Fibrillation Management in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Study Incorporating Human Factors Design.评估用于基层医疗中房颤管理的电子病历工具包的可用性和感知影响:一项纳入人因设计的混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2016 Feb 17;3(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.4289.
10
Nurses' Experiences After Implementation of an Organization-Wide Electronic Medical Record: Qualitative Descriptive Study.全机构实施电子病历后护士的体验:定性描述性研究
JMIR Nurs. 2022 Jul 26;5(1):e39596. doi: 10.2196/39596.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts on quality of care following electronic health record implementation within a large Canadian community hospital: a qualitative study.加拿大一家大型社区医院实施电子健康记录后对医疗质量的影响:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 15;15(4):e097646. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097646.
2
The influence of electronic health record design on usability and medication safety: systematic review.电子健康记录设计对可用性和用药安全的影响:系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12060-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing complexity when developing an education program for the implementation of a stroke Electronic Medical Record (EMR) enhancement.在制定实施卒中电子病历(EMR)增强的教育计划时,要解决复杂性问题。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 24;23(1):1301. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10314-z.
2
Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice.人工智能在临床实践中的应用:医疗保健的革命。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z.
3
The Limitations of User-and Human-Centered Design in an eHealth Context and How to Move Beyond Them.
电子健康背景下用户和以人为中心的设计的局限性以及如何超越这些局限性。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 5;24(10):e37341. doi: 10.2196/37341.
4
Psychological, social and technical factors influencing electronic medical records systems adoption by United States physicians: a systematic model.影响美国医生采用电子病历系统的心理、社会和技术因素:一个系统模型
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 May 2;20(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00851-0.
5
The negative impact of interface design, customizability, inefficiency, malfunctions, and information retrieval on user experience: A national usability survey of ICU clinical information systems in Finland.界面设计、可定制性、低效率、故障和信息检索对用户体验的负面影响:芬兰 ICU 临床信息系统的全国可用性调查。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Mar;159:104680. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104680. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
6
Establishing a multidisciplinary initiative for interoperable electronic health record innovations at an academic medical center.在一所学术医疗中心建立一个针对可互操作电子健康记录创新的多学科倡议。
JAMIA Open. 2021 Jul 31;4(3):ooab041. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab041. eCollection 2021 Jul.
7
Effects of Electronic Health Record Implementation and Barriers to Adoption and Use: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis of the Content.电子健康记录实施的效果以及采用和使用的障碍:一项范围综述和内容定性分析
Life (Basel). 2020 Dec 4;10(12):327. doi: 10.3390/life10120327.
8
Lessons learned about the effective operationalization of champions as an implementation strategy: results from a qualitative process evaluation of a pragmatic trial.关于将拥护者作为一种实施策略有效付诸实践的经验教训:一项实用试验的定性过程评估结果
Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 1;15(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01048-1.
9
Seeking Meaningful Innovation: Lessons Learned Developing, Evaluating, and Implementing the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool.寻求有意义的创新:开发、评估和实施电子患者报告结局工具的经验教训
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 29;22(7):e17987. doi: 10.2196/17987.
10
A qualitative study of physician perspectives on adaptation to electronic health records.一项关于医生对电子健康记录适应观点的定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1030-6.