Centre for Infection Prevention and Management, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Surgery and Cancer and Imperial Centre for Patient Safety and Service Quality, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 14;9(1):e86167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086167. eCollection 2014.
The use of peripheral vascular catheters (PVCs) is an extremely common and necessary clinical intervention, but inappropriate PVC care poses a major patient safety risk in terms of infection. Quality improvement initiatives have been proposed to reduce the likelihood of adverse events, but a lack of understanding about factors that influence behaviours of healthcare professionals limits the efficacy of such interventions. We undertook qualitative interviews with clinical staff from a large group of hospitals in order to understand influences on PVC care behaviors and subsequent patient safety.
Ten doctors, ten clinical pharmacists, 18 nurses and one midwife at a National Health Service hospital group in London (United Kingdom) were interviewed between December 2010 and July 2011 using qualitative methods. Responses were analysed using a thematic framework.
FOUR KEY THEMES EMERGED: 1) Fragmentation of management and care, demonstrated with a lack of general overview and insufficient knowledge about expected standards of care or responsibility of different professionals; 2) feelings of resentment and frustration as a result of tensions in the workplace, due to the ambiguity about professional responsibilities; 3) disregard for existing hospital policy due to perceptions of flaws in the evidence used to support it; and 4) low-risk perception for the impact of PVC use on patient safety.
Fragmentation of practice resulted in ill-defined responsibilities and interdisciplinary resentment, which coupled with a generally low perception of risk of catheter use, appeared to result in lack of maintaining policy PVC standards which could reduced patient safety. Resolution of these issues through clearly defining handover practice, teaching interdisciplinary duties and increasing awareness of PVC risks could result in preventing thousands of BSIs and other PVC-related infections annually.
外周血管导管(PVC)的使用是一种极其常见且必要的临床干预措施,但不适当的 PVC 护理会给患者安全带来重大风险,尤其是感染方面。已经提出了质量改进措施来降低不良事件的发生概率,但由于缺乏对影响医疗保健专业人员行为的因素的了解,这些干预措施的效果受到限制。我们对来自伦敦一个大型医院集团的临床工作人员进行了定性访谈,以了解影响 PVC 护理行为和随后的患者安全的因素。
2010 年 12 月至 2011 年 7 月期间,在英国伦敦的一家国民保健制度医院集团中,对 10 名医生、10 名临床药师、18 名护士和 1 名助产士进行了定性访谈,使用定性方法。使用主题框架分析了答复。
出现了四个关键主题:1)管理和护理的碎片化,表现为缺乏对预期护理标准或不同专业人员责任的总体了解;2)由于对专业责任的模糊认识,工作场所的紧张局势导致的怨恨和沮丧感;3)由于对支持它的证据存在缺陷的看法,对现有医院政策的漠视;4)对 PVC 使用对患者安全的影响的低风险感知。
实践的碎片化导致责任界定不明确和跨学科的怨恨,再加上对导管使用风险的普遍低感知,似乎导致未能维持 PVC 标准,从而降低了患者安全。通过明确界定交接实践、教授跨学科职责以及提高对 PVC 风险的认识,可以解决这些问题,每年可防止数千例 BSIs 和其他与 PVC 相关的感染。