Grandahl Maria, Oscarsson Marie, Stenhammar Christina, Nevéus Tryggve, Westerling Ragnar, Tydén Tanja
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Acta Paediatr. 2014 Apr;103(4):436-41. doi: 10.1111/apa.12545. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
To explore why parents refused to allow their 10- to 12-year-old daughters to receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination from the Swedish school-based vaccination programme.
Individual interviews with 25 parents who had been offered, but not consented to, their daughters receiving the HPV vaccination.
Five themes emerged through the interviews: 1) she is just a little girl, 2) inadequate information, 3) not compatible with our way of life, 4) scepticism about the vaccination and 5) who can you trust? The parents made their decisions with their child's best interests in mind. This was not considered the right time, and the vaccine was perceived as unnecessary and different from other vaccines. Mistrust in Government recommendations and a lack of evidence or information were other reasons to decline.
The decision-making process was complex. These parents preferred to wait until their daughter was older and believed the information they received from the school health system was insufficient. The results indicate that a more flexible HPV vaccination schedule may improve vaccine uptake. This includes more transparent information about the virus and the vaccine and information about who to contact to get the daughter vaccinated at a later date.
探讨为何父母拒绝让其10至12岁的女儿接种瑞典学校疫苗接种计划中的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗。
对25位父母进行个人访谈,这些父母曾被提议让女儿接种HPV疫苗,但未同意。
访谈中出现了五个主题:1)她还是个小女孩;2)信息不足;3)与我们的生活方式不相符;4)对疫苗持怀疑态度;5)能信任谁?父母们做决定时考虑到了孩子的最大利益。他们认为这个时机不对,而且该疫苗被认为是不必要的,与其他疫苗不同。对政府建议的不信任以及缺乏证据或信息是拒绝接种的其他原因。
决策过程很复杂。这些父母更愿意等到女儿年龄再大一些,并且认为他们从学校卫生系统获得的信息不足。结果表明,更灵活的HPV疫苗接种时间表可能会提高疫苗接种率。这包括提供关于该病毒和疫苗的更透明信息,以及关于日后若要为女儿接种疫苗应联系谁的信息。