University of Lodz, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, Department of Thermobiology, Pomorska 141/143, 90-236 Lodz, Poland.
Department of Haemostasis and Haemostatic Disorders, Medical University of Lodz, University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Zeromskiego 113, 90-549 Lodz, Poland.
Int J Pharm. 2014 Apr 10;464(1-2):152-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
Poly(amido)amine (PAMAM) G4 dendrimers, given intraperitoneally to diabetic rats, have been reported to scavenge excessive blood glucose and minimize the effects of hyperglycaemia, however, at the cost of reduced survival. This paper is the first to compare the effectiveness of three different routes of PAMAM G4 administration with regard to minimizing the adverse effects of hyperglycaemia in rats. Hence, the aim of the study is to identify the most effective and the least harmful method of dendrimer administration. Control and streptozotocin-diabetic Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to PAMAM G4 (0.5 μmol/kg b.w.) for 60 days, administered intraperitoneally, intragastrically or subcutaneously. Intraperitoneal and subcutaneous administration of PAMAM G4 was found to be most effective in suppressing the long-term markers of hyperglycaemia, while the intragastric route appeared the least effective. Otherwise, the greatest incidence of adverse effects was associated with intraperitoneal and the lowest with subcutaneous delivery. Harmful effects of intragastrical administration were much lower compared to intraperitoneal route, but at the cost of reduced hypoglycaemizing potential. Otherwise, subcutaneous injection represents the best compromise of moderate PAMAM dendrimer toxicity and effective reduction in the markers of long-term severe hyperglycaemia in chronic experimental diabetes.
聚(酰胺-胺)(PAMAM)G4 树状聚合物,经腹腔内给予糖尿病大鼠,已被报道能清除过多的血糖并最大限度地减少高血糖的影响,但代价是降低了存活率。本文首次比较了三种不同途径给予 PAMAM G4 对减少大鼠高血糖不良影响的有效性。因此,本研究的目的是确定树状聚合物给药最有效和最无害的方法。对照和链脲佐菌素诱导的糖尿病 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠在 60 天内接受 0.5 μmol/kg b.w.的 PAMAM G4 腹腔内、胃内或皮下给药。结果发现,腹腔内和皮下给予 PAMAM G4 是抑制长期高血糖标志物最有效的方法,而胃内途径似乎效果最差。此外,与皮下给药相比,腹腔内给药的不良影响发生率最高,而皮下给药的发生率最低。与腹腔内给药途径相比,胃内给药的有害作用要低得多,但以降低降血糖潜力为代价。否则,皮下注射是在中度 PAMAM 树状聚合物毒性和有效减少慢性实验性糖尿病中晚期严重高血糖标志物方面的最佳折衷。