• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭联合组织:家庭小组办公室访视为降低2型糖尿病风险因素。

Families United/Familias Unidas: family group office visits to reduce risk factors for type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Kutob Randa M, Siwik Violet Perez, Aickin Mikel, Ritenbaugh Cheryl

机构信息

The Department of Family and Community Medicine, Arizona Health Sciences Center, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):191-201. doi: 10.1177/0145721714520722. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1177/0145721714520722
PMID:24464087
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the Families United/Familias Unidas study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of group office visits on reducing diabetes risk in a multiethnic, primary care population.

METHODS

Adults, ages 18 to 70 years, with any diabetes risk factor were recruited to attend 12 group office visits over 6 months. Each participant identified 1 support person, age 14 to 70 years, to accompany them. Data were collected at baseline, postintervention, 6 months, and 12 months. Primary outcome measures were reduction in the total number of predefined, modifiable risk factors (ie, body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2); waist circumference ≥88 cm [women], ≥102 cm [men]; blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg; hemoglobin A1C ≥5.7%; fasting insulin ≥15 µU/mL; glycemic index ≥52.5% [women], ≥53.4% [men]; and physical activity <150 min/wk).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine participants/supporters completed the intervention (mean age 47.8 ± 12.3 years, 69.2% female, 61.5% white, 35.9% Latino). Risk reduction analysis included only participants/supporters who remained paired at the intervention's end (n = 36). At baseline, primary participants (n = 18) had an average of 4.8 ± 1.6 (standard error) predefined risk factors; supporters (n = 18), 4.1 ± 1.4. Primary participants' risk factors decreased approximately 15% immediately after the 6-month intervention (absolute reduction of 1.1 risk factors) and increased to ~20% reduction 1 year postintervention (absolute reduction of 1.4 risk factors). Risk reduction was primarily due to decreases in dietary glycemic index and fasting insulin levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Group visits provide an innovative and potentially efficacious model of diabetes prevention in multiethnic patients with heterogeneous risk factors.

摘要

目的

“家庭联合/家人团结”研究的目的是评估团队门诊对降低多民族初级保健人群糖尿病风险的可行性和有效性。

方法

招募年龄在18至70岁之间、有任何糖尿病风险因素的成年人,在6个月内参加12次团队门诊。每位参与者指定一名年龄在14至70岁之间的支持人员陪同。在基线、干预后、6个月和12个月时收集数据。主要结局指标是预定义的可改变风险因素总数的减少(即体重指数≥25kg/m²;腰围≥88cm[女性],≥102cm[男性];血压≥140/90mmHg;糖化血红蛋白≥5.7%;空腹胰岛素≥15µU/mL;血糖指数≥52.5%[女性],≥53.4%[男性];以及身体活动<150分钟/周)。

结果

39名参与者/支持者完成了干预(平均年龄47.8±12.3岁,69.2%为女性,61.5%为白人,35.9%为拉丁裔)。风险降低分析仅包括在干预结束时仍配对的参与者/支持者(n=36)。在基线时,主要参与者(n=18)平均有4.8±1.6(标准误)个预定义风险因素;支持者(n=18)为4.1±1.4个。主要参与者的风险因素在6个月干预后立即下降了约15%(绝对减少1.1个风险因素),在干预后1年增加到约20%的降低(绝对减少1.4个风险因素)。风险降低主要归因于饮食血糖指数和空腹胰岛素水平的下降。

结论

团队门诊为具有异质性风险因素的多民族患者提供了一种创新且可能有效的糖尿病预防模式。

相似文献

1
Families United/Familias Unidas: family group office visits to reduce risk factors for type 2 diabetes.家庭联合组织:家庭小组办公室访视为降低2型糖尿病风险因素。
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):191-201. doi: 10.1177/0145721714520722. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
2
Families United/Familias Unidas: development and implementation of a family-based group office visit model for the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes.家庭联合组织:为预防 2 型糖尿病而开发和实施的一种基于家庭的小组就诊模式。
Diabetes Educ. 2012 Nov-Dec;38(6):811-21. doi: 10.1177/0145721712461533. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
3
A feasibility study to develop a diabetes prevention program for young adults with prediabetes by using digital platforms and a handheld device.一项关于利用数字平台和手持设备为患有糖尿病前期的年轻人制定糖尿病预防计划的可行性研究。
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;40(5):626-37. doi: 10.1177/0145721714539736. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
4
The effects of a community-based, culturally tailored diabetes prevention intervention for high-risk adults of Mexican descent.一项针对墨西哥裔高危成年人的、基于社区且量身定制的糖尿病预防干预措施的效果。
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):202-13. doi: 10.1177/0145721714521020. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
5
Effectiveness of a brief theory-based health promotion intervention among adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes: One-year results from a randomised trial in a community setting.一项基于理论的简短健康促进干预措施对2型糖尿病高危成年人的有效性:社区环境中一项随机试验的一年结果。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2016 Apr;10(2):111-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
6
One-Year Results of a Synthetic Intervention Model for the Primary Prevention of T2D among Elderly Individuals with Prediabetes in Rural China.中国农村糖尿病前期老年人2型糖尿病一级预防综合干预模式的一年期结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Apr 14;14(4):417. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040417.
7
The effect of medical nutrition therapy by a registered dietitian nutritionist in patients with prediabetes participating in a randomized controlled clinical research trial.注册营养师进行的医学营养治疗对参与随机对照临床研究试验的糖尿病前期患者的影响。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Nov;114(11):1739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
8
[Steps toward the primary prevention of type II diabetes mellitus. Various epidemiological considerations].[迈向2型糖尿病一级预防的步骤。各种流行病学考量]
Invest Clin. 1997 Mar;38(1):39-52.
9
Scaling-up from an implementation trial to state-wide coverage: results from the preliminary Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study.从实施试验到全州范围覆盖的扩展:来自墨尔本糖尿病预防研究的初步结果。
Trials. 2012 Aug 28;13:152. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-152.
10
The effectiveness of a primary care nursing-led dietary intervention for prediabetes: a mixed methods pilot study.一项由初级护理护士主导的针对糖尿病前期的饮食干预措施的有效性:一项混合方法试点研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Dec 21;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0671-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Obtaining evidence base for the development of Feel4Diabetes intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes - a narrative literature review.为开发 Feel4Diabetes 干预措施以预防 2 型糖尿病获取证据基础 - 叙述性文献回顾。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2020 Mar 12;20(Suppl 1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0468-y.
2
Talking About Type 2 Diabetes: Family Communication From the Perspective of At-Risk Relatives.谈谈2型糖尿病:高危亲属视角下的家庭沟通
Diabetes Educ. 2015 Dec;41(6):716-28. doi: 10.1177/0145721715604367. Epub 2015 Aug 31.