• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于利用数字平台和手持设备为患有糖尿病前期的年轻人制定糖尿病预防计划的可行性研究。

A feasibility study to develop a diabetes prevention program for young adults with prediabetes by using digital platforms and a handheld device.

作者信息

Cha EunSeok, Kim Kevin H, Umpierrez Guillermo, Dawkins Colleen R, Bello Morenike K, Lerner Hannah M, Narayan K M Venkat, Dunbar Sandra B

机构信息

Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Cha, Dr Umpierrez, Ms Dawkins, Ms Bello, Dr Venkat Narayan, Dr Dunbar)

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Kim)

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;40(5):626-37. doi: 10.1177/0145721714539736. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1177/0145721714539736
PMID:24950683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4169327/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an age-specific diabetes prevention program in young adults with prediabetes.

METHODS

A one-group pretest-posttest design was used. The inclusion criteria were age 18 to 29 years and the presence of prediabetes (either impaired fasting glucose of 100-125 mg/dL [5.55-6.94 mmol/L] or A1C of 5.7%-6.4%). Fifteen participants were enrolled in the study. A technology-based lifestyle coaching program focused on diet and physical activity and incorporating a handheld device and digital platforms was developed and tested. Psychosocial factors (health literacy, illness perception, self-efficacy, therapeutic efficacy) based on social cognitive theory, changes in diet and physical activity, and cardiometabolic risk factors were assessed at baseline and week 12 after the intervention. A paired-samples t test was performed to examine changes between baseline and postintervention on each psychosocial and physical variable.

RESULTS

Participants' (n = 13 completers) mean age was 24.4 ± 2.2 years, 23.1% were male, and 53.8% were African American. Overall, the participants were satisfied with the intervention (mean score, 4.15 on a 5-point, Likert-type scale). Between pre- and posttesting, mean body mass index and mean A1C decreased from 41.0 ± 7.3 kg/m(2) and 6.0 ± 0.5% to 40.1 ± 7.0 kg/m(2) and 5.6 ± 0.5%, respectively, whereas mean fasting glucose did not significantly change (from 92.6 ± 11 to 97.6 ± 14.3 mg/dL [5.14 ± 0.61 to 5.42 ± 0.79 mmol/L]).

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention resulted in reduced A1C and a trend toward decreased body mass index in obese sedentary young adults with prediabetes after 12 weeks. Further study through a randomized clinical trial with a longer intervention period is warranted.

摘要

目的

本试点研究旨在检验一项针对糖尿病前期年轻成年人的特定年龄糖尿病预防计划的可行性和初步疗效。

方法

采用单组前后测设计。纳入标准为年龄在18至29岁之间且患有糖尿病前期(空腹血糖受损为100 - 125 mg/dL [5.55 - 6.94 mmol/L] 或糖化血红蛋白为5.7% - 6.4%)。15名参与者被纳入该研究。开发并测试了一项基于技术的生活方式指导计划,该计划侧重于饮食和体育活动,并结合了手持设备和数字平台。基于社会认知理论评估心理社会因素(健康素养、疾病认知、自我效能感、治疗效果)、饮食和体育活动的变化以及心血管代谢危险因素,在干预前的基线和干预后第12周进行评估。进行配对样本t检验以检查每个心理社会和身体变量在基线和干预后之间的变化。

结果

参与者(n = 13名完成者)的平均年龄为24.4 ± 2.2岁,23.1%为男性,53.8%为非裔美国人。总体而言,参与者对干预感到满意(在5分制李克特量表上的平均得分为4.15)。在前后测试之间,平均体重指数和平均糖化血红蛋白分别从41.0 ± 7.3 kg/m²和6.0 ± 0.5%降至40.1 ± 7.0 kg/m²和5.6 ± 0.5%,而平均空腹血糖没有显著变化(从92.6 ± 11降至97.6 ± 14.3 mg/dL [5.14 ± 0.61降至5.42 ± 0.79 mmol/L])。

结论

干预导致患有糖尿病前期的肥胖久坐年轻成年人在12周后糖化血红蛋白降低且体重指数有下降趋势。有必要通过干预期更长的随机临床试验进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
A feasibility study to develop a diabetes prevention program for young adults with prediabetes by using digital platforms and a handheld device.一项关于利用数字平台和手持设备为患有糖尿病前期的年轻人制定糖尿病预防计划的可行性研究。
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;40(5):626-37. doi: 10.1177/0145721714539736. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
2
Families United/Familias Unidas: family group office visits to reduce risk factors for type 2 diabetes.家庭联合组织:家庭小组办公室访视为降低2型糖尿病风险因素。
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):191-201. doi: 10.1177/0145721714520722. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
3
Prevalence of Prediabetes Among Adolescents and Young Adults in the United States, 2005-2016.美国青少年和青年中前驱糖尿病的流行率,2005-2016 年。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Feb 1;174(2):e194498. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.4498. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
4
The effect of medical nutrition therapy by a registered dietitian nutritionist in patients with prediabetes participating in a randomized controlled clinical research trial.注册营养师进行的医学营养治疗对参与随机对照临床研究试验的糖尿病前期患者的影响。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Nov;114(11):1739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
5
Characteristics of American young adults with increased risk for type 2 diabetes: a pilot study.2型糖尿病风险增加的美国年轻人的特征:一项试点研究。
Diabetes Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;39(4):454-63. doi: 10.1177/0145721713486199. Epub 2013 May 2.
6
ForgIng New paths in DIabetes PrevenTion (FINDIT): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.糖尿病预防新路径研究(FINDIT):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Apr 8;18(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1887-6.
7
Social cognitive theory-based intervention to promote physical activity among prediabetic rural people: a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于社会认知理论的干预措施促进农村糖尿病前期人群身体活动:一项整群随机对照试验
Trials. 2019 Feb 4;20(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3220-z.
8
The effects of a community-based, culturally tailored diabetes prevention intervention for high-risk adults of Mexican descent.一项针对墨西哥裔高危成年人的、基于社区且量身定制的糖尿病预防干预措施的效果。
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):202-13. doi: 10.1177/0145721714521020. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
9
Effectiveness of a Yoga-Based Lifestyle Protocol (YLP) in Preventing Diabetes in a High-Risk Indian Cohort: A Multicenter Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial (NMB-Trial).瑜伽生活方式方案(YLP)预防高危印度人群糖尿病的效果:一项多中心整群随机对照试验(NMB-Trial)。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 11;12:664657. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.664657. eCollection 2021.
10
Mobile Delivery of the Diabetes Prevention Program in People With Prediabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.移动医疗在糖尿病前期人群中应用糖尿病预防计划的随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 8;8(7):e17842. doi: 10.2196/17842.

引用本文的文献

1
Exercise Barriers Among Females With Type 2 Diabetes: Exploring Age-Related Differences.2型糖尿病女性的运动障碍:探索年龄相关差异
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2025 Aug;51(4):404-414. doi: 10.1177/26350106251350613. Epub 2025 Jul 20.
2
Digital Health Interventions to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review.预防2型糖尿病的数字健康干预措施:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 25;27:e67507. doi: 10.2196/67507.
3
Behavioral interventions for adolescents and young adults with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes.针对2型糖尿病或糖尿病前期青少年及青年的行为干预措施。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2025 Aug 1;37(4):350-356. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000001461. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
4
Evaluation of feasibility and acceptability of a web-based diabetes prevention program (DPP) for diabetes risk reduction in Chinese Americans in New York City.评价基于网络的糖尿病预防计划(DPP)在中国纽约城美籍糖尿病高危人群中降低糖尿病风险的可行性和可接受性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 2;11:1199746. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1199746. eCollection 2023.
5
Study protocol: Behavioral economics and self-determination theory to change diabetes risk (BEST Change).研究方案:行为经济学和自我决定理论改变糖尿病风险(BESTChange)。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Jan;124:107038. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107038. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
6
A systematic review of the behaviour change techniques and digital features in technology-driven type 2 diabetes prevention interventions.对技术驱动型2型糖尿病预防干预措施中的行为改变技术和数字特征的系统评价。
Digit Health. 2020 Mar 24;6:2055207620914427. doi: 10.1177/2055207620914427. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
7
Effectiveness of DVD vs. group-initiated diabetes prevention on information uptake for high & low health literacy participants.DVD 与团体启动的糖尿病预防对高/低健康素养参与者信息获取的效果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 May;102(5):968-975. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.026. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
8
Digital Health-Supported Lifestyle Change Programs to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes.数字健康支持的生活方式改变计划预防2型糖尿病
Diabetes Spectr. 2018 Nov;31(4):303-309. doi: 10.2337/ds18-0019.
9
Diabetes Prevention for African-Americans: a Scoping Review.非裔美国人的糖尿病预防:范围综述。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Oct;5(5):947-965. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0443-0. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
10
The Effect of Technology-Mediated Diabetes Prevention Interventions on Weight: A Meta-Analysis.技术介导的糖尿病预防干预措施对体重的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 27;19(3):e76. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4709.

本文引用的文献

1
Health literacy, self-efficacy, food label use, and diet in young adults.年轻人的健康素养、自我效能感、食品标签使用情况及饮食
Am J Health Behav. 2014 May;38(3):331-9. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.38.3.2.
2
A randomized trial investigating the effect of a brief lifestyle intervention on freshman-year weight gain.一项调查短期生活方式干预对大学一年级体重增加影响的随机试验。
J Am Coll Health. 2014;62(2):101-9. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2013.849259.
3
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014.2014年糖尿病医疗护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S14-80. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S014.
4
A mobile health intervention for weight management among young adults: a pilot randomised controlled trial.一项针对年轻人体重管理的移动健康干预措施:一项试点随机对照试验。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Aug;27(4):322-32. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12155. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
5
Characteristics of American young adults with increased risk for type 2 diabetes: a pilot study.2型糖尿病风险增加的美国年轻人的特征:一项试点研究。
Diabetes Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;39(4):454-63. doi: 10.1177/0145721713486199. Epub 2013 May 2.
6
The Healthy Living Partnerships to Prevent Diabetes study: 2-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial.健康生活伙伴关系预防糖尿病研究:一项随机对照试验的 2 年结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Apr;44(4 Suppl 4):S324-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.12.015.
7
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2013.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2013》
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-66. doi: 10.2337/dc13-S011.
8
The CHANGE program: comparing an interactive versus prescriptive obesity intervention on university students' self-esteem and quality of life.CHANGE 项目:对比互动式与规定式肥胖干预对大学生自尊和生活质量的影响。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2012 Nov;4(3):369-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2012.01080.x. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
9
Long-term effects of the Diabetes Prevention Program interventions on cardiovascular risk factors: a report from the DPP Outcomes Study.糖尿病预防计划干预对心血管风险因素的长期影响:来自 DPP 结局研究的报告。
Diabet Med. 2013 Jan;30(1):46-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03750.x.
10
Effect of regression from prediabetes to normal glucose regulation on long-term reduction in diabetes risk: results from the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study.从糖尿病前期恢复至正常血糖调节对长期降低糖尿病风险的影响:来自糖尿病预防计划结局研究的结果。
Lancet. 2012 Jun 16;379(9833):2243-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60525-X. Epub 2012 Jun 9.