• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于在资源匮乏地区评估和分诊妊娠高血压疾病女性的风险预测模型:小型PIERS(先兆子痫综合风险评估)多国前瞻性队列研究。

A risk prediction model for the assessment and triage of women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in low-resourced settings: the miniPIERS (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) multi-country prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Payne Beth A, Hutcheon Jennifer A, Ansermino J Mark, Hall David R, Bhutta Zulfiqar A, Bhutta Shereen Z, Biryabarema Christine, Grobman William A, Groen Henk, Haniff Farizah, Li Jing, Magee Laura A, Merialdi Mario, Nakimuli Annettee, Qu Ziguang, Sikandar Rozina, Sass Nelson, Sawchuck Diane, Steyn D Wilhelm, Widmer Mariana, Zhou Jian, von Dadelszen Peter

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and the CFRI Reproductive and Healthy Pregnancy Cluster, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and the CFRI Reproductive and Healthy Pregnancy Cluster, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada ; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2014 Jan;11(1):e1001589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001589. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001589
PMID:24465185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3897359/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pre-eclampsia/eclampsia are leading causes of maternal mortality and morbidity, particularly in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs). We developed the miniPIERS risk prediction model to provide a simple, evidence-based tool to identify pregnant women in LMICs at increased risk of death or major hypertensive-related complications.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

From 1 July 2008 to 31 March 2012, in five LMICs, data were collected prospectively on 2,081 women with any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy admitted to a participating centre. Candidate predictors collected within 24 hours of admission were entered into a step-wise backward elimination logistic regression model to predict a composite adverse maternal outcome within 48 hours of admission. Model internal validation was accomplished by bootstrapping and external validation was completed using data from 1,300 women in the Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk (fullPIERS) dataset. Predictive performance was assessed for calibration, discrimination, and stratification capacity. The final miniPIERS model included: parity (nulliparous versus multiparous); gestational age on admission; headache/visual disturbances; chest pain/dyspnoea; vaginal bleeding with abdominal pain; systolic blood pressure; and dipstick proteinuria. The miniPIERS model was well-calibrated and had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) of 0.768 (95% CI 0.735-0.801) with an average optimism of 0.037. External validation AUC ROC was 0.713 (95% CI 0.658-0.768). A predicted probability ≥25% to define a positive test classified women with 85.5% accuracy. Limitations of this study include the composite outcome and the broad inclusion criteria of any hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. This broad approach was used to optimize model generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

The miniPIERS model shows reasonable ability to identify women at increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes associated with the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. It could be used in LMICs to identify women who would benefit most from interventions such as magnesium sulphate, antihypertensives, or transportation to a higher level of care.

摘要

背景

先兆子痫/子痫是孕产妇发病和死亡的主要原因,在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)尤为如此。我们开发了miniPIERS风险预测模型,以提供一种简单的、基于证据的工具,用于识别LMICs中死亡风险或主要高血压相关并发症风险增加的孕妇。

方法和结果

2008年7月1日至2012年3月31日期间,在5个LMICs中,前瞻性收集了2081名入住参与中心的患有任何妊娠高血压疾病的妇女的数据。将入院24小时内收集的候选预测因素纳入逐步向后排除逻辑回归模型,以预测入院48小时内的综合不良孕产妇结局。模型内部验证通过自抽样法完成,外部验证使用先兆子痫风险综合评估(fullPIERS)数据集中1300名妇女的数据完成。对校准、区分和分层能力进行预测性能评估。最终的miniPIERS模型包括:产次(初产妇与经产妇);入院时的孕周;头痛/视觉障碍;胸痛/呼吸困难;伴有腹痛的阴道出血;收缩压;以及试纸法蛋白尿。miniPIERS模型校准良好,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC ROC)为(0.768)((95%)CI (0.735 - 0.801)),平均乐观度为(0.037)。外部验证AUC ROC为(0.713)((95%)CI (0.658 - 0.768))。预测概率≥(25%)定义为阳性检测,对妇女分类的准确率为(85.5%)。本研究的局限性包括综合结局以及任何妊娠高血压疾病的广泛纳入标准。采用这种广泛的方法是为了优化模型的通用性。

结论

miniPIERS模型显示出合理的能力,能够识别与妊娠高血压疾病相关的不良孕产妇结局风险增加的妇女。它可用于LMICs中识别那些将从硫酸镁、抗高血压药物或转运至更高水平医疗护理等干预措施中获益最大的妇女。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41c5/3897359/36eba09a9c1a/pmed.1001589.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41c5/3897359/f2a7d765bbd2/pmed.1001589.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41c5/3897359/f7d518834213/pmed.1001589.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41c5/3897359/36eba09a9c1a/pmed.1001589.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41c5/3897359/f2a7d765bbd2/pmed.1001589.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41c5/3897359/f7d518834213/pmed.1001589.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41c5/3897359/36eba09a9c1a/pmed.1001589.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A risk prediction model for the assessment and triage of women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in low-resourced settings: the miniPIERS (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) multi-country prospective cohort study.一种用于在资源匮乏地区评估和分诊妊娠高血压疾病女性的风险预测模型:小型PIERS(先兆子痫综合风险评估)多国前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2014 Jan;11(1):e1001589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001589. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
2
External Validation of the fullPIERS Model for Predicting Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Pregnancy Hypertension in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.低收入和中等收入国家妊娠期高血压不良孕产妇结局预测的fullPIERS模型外部验证
Hypertension. 2017 Apr;69(4):705-711. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08706. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
3
Development and validation of risk prediction models for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in severe preeclampsia in a low-resource setting, Mpilo Central Hospital, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.在资源匮乏的背景下,津巴布韦布拉瓦约姆皮洛中央医院严重子痫前期不良母婴结局风险预测模型的开发和验证。
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2021 Mar;23:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2020.10.011. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
4
Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model.预测子痫前期不良母婴结局:全 PIERS 模型的建立与验证。
Lancet. 2011 Jan 15;377(9761):219-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61351-7. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
5
Retrospective validation study of miniPIERS prediction model in Zanzibar.回顾性验证研究:迷你 PIERS 预测模型在桑给巴尔的应用。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 May;153(2):300-306. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13493. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
6
External Validation of the fullPIERS Risk Prediction Model in a U.S. Cohort of Individuals with Preeclampsia.全PIERS风险预测模型在美国先兆子痫患者队列中的外部验证
Am J Perinatol. 2025 Jun;42(8):1035-1042. doi: 10.1055/a-2452-8220. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
7
Development and internal validation of a multivariable model to predict perinatal death in pregnancy hypertension.预测妊娠高血压围产期死亡的多变量模型的开发与内部验证
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2015 Oct;5(4):315-21. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
8
Development and validation of Prediction models for Risks of complications in Early-onset Pre-eclampsia (PREP): a prospective cohort study.早发型子痫前期(PREP)并发症风险预测模型的开发与验证:一项前瞻性队列研究
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Apr;21(18):1-100. doi: 10.3310/hta21180.
9
Prediction of complications of pre-eclampsia using the fullPIERS high risk predictive model.使用全PIERS高危预测模型预测子痫前期的并发症
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Dec;163(3):983-988. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14920. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
10
Predicting complications in pre-eclampsia: external validation of the fullPIERS model using the PETRA trial dataset.预测子痫前期的并发症:使用PETRA试验数据集对FullPIERS模型进行外部验证。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Aug;179:58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting interval from diagnosis to delivery in preeclampsia using electronic health records.利用电子健康记录预测子痫前期从诊断到分娩的时间间隔。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 12;16(1):3496. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58437-7.
2
Predicting complications in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: external validation of a prognostic model for adverse perinatal outcomes.预测妊娠高血压疾病的并发症:围产期不良结局预后模型的外部验证
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Feb 16;5(2):100455. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100455. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Prediction of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia complications using PIERS.

本文引用的文献

1
Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.1990年和2010年20个年龄组中235种死因的全球和区域死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2010的系统分析
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0.
2
Pre-eclampsia in low and middle income countries.中低收入国家的子痫前期。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Aug;25(4):537-48. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 May 17.
3
Assessment, surveillance and prognosis in pre-eclampsia.
使用PIERS预测先兆子痫和子痫并发症。
Bioinformation. 2024 Oct 31;20(10):1383-1389. doi: 10.6026/9732063002001383. eCollection 2024.
4
Leveraging Machine Learning to Predict and Assess Disparities in Severe Maternal Morbidity in Maryland.利用机器学习预测和评估马里兰州严重孕产妇发病率的差异。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 31;13(3):284. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030284.
5
Consecutive prediction of adverse maternal outcomes of preeclampsia, using the PIERS-ML and fullPIERS models: A multicountry prospective observational study.使用PIERS-ML和fullPIERS模型对先兆子痫孕产妇不良结局进行连续预测:一项多国前瞻性观察研究。
PLoS Med. 2025 Feb 4;22(2):e1004509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004509. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Evaluating the ability of fullPIERS calculator to predict adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital.评估全PIERS计算器在夏洛特·马克西克·约翰内斯堡学术医院预测子痫前期孕产妇不良结局的能力。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;170(1):345-351. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16181. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
7
Diagnostic properties of differing BP thresholds for adverse pregnancy outcomes in standard-risk nulliparous women: A secondary analysis of SCOPE cohort data.标准风险初产妇不同血压阈值对不良妊娠结局的诊断特性:SCOPE队列数据的二次分析
PLoS Med. 2025 Jan 22;22(1):e1004471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004471. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Prediction of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with pre-eclampsia and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与子痫前期和妊娠高血压疾病相关的孕产妇及围产期不良结局的预测:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Sep 27;76:102861. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102861. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
The epidemiology and risk factors for postnatal complications among postpartum women and newborns in southwestern Uganda: A prospective cohort study.乌干达西南部产后妇女和新生儿产后并发症的流行病学及危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Aug 7;4(8):e0003458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003458. eCollection 2024.
10
sFlt1/PlGF among patients with suspected preeclampsia when considering hypertensive status.在考虑高血压状态时,疑似子痫前期患者中的可溶性血管内皮生长因子受体1/胎盘生长因子水平
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 May 27;4(3):100359. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100359. eCollection 2024 Aug.
子痫前期的评估、监测和预后。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Aug;25(4):449-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
4
Temporising versus interventionist management (preterm and at term).保守治疗与干预性治疗(早产与足月)。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Aug;25(4):463-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
5
Epidemiology of pre-eclampsia and the other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.子痫前期和其他妊娠高血压疾病的流行病学。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Aug;25(4):391-403. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
6
Health workforce skill mix and task shifting in low income countries: a review of recent evidence.卫生人力技能组合和任务转移在低收入国家:近期证据回顾。
Hum Resour Health. 2011 Jan 11;9:1. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-9-1.
7
Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model.预测子痫前期不良母婴结局:全 PIERS 模型的建立与验证。
Lancet. 2011 Jan 15;377(9761):219-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61351-7. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
8
Pre-eclampsia.子痫前期。
Lancet. 2010 Aug 21;376(9741):631-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60279-6. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
9
Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.评估预测模型的性能:传统和新型指标的框架。
Epidemiology. 2010 Jan;21(1):128-38. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c30fb2.
10
Still too far to walk: literature review of the determinants of delivery service use.步行距离仍过远:关于分娩服务利用决定因素的文献综述
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Aug 11;9:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-34.