Olde Loohuis Klaartje M, Luijken Kim, Brown Amoakoh Hannah, Adu-Bonsaffoh Kwame, Grobbee Diederick E, Klipstein-Grobusch Kerstin, Srofenyoh Emmanuel, Amoakoh-Coleman Mary, Browne Joyce L
Department of Global Public Health and Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Olde Loohuis, Brown Amoakoh, Adu-Bonsaffoh, Grobbee, Klipstein-Grobusch, Amoakoh-Coleman, and Browne).
Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (Luijken).
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Feb 16;5(2):100455. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100455. eCollection 2025 May.
Prediction models can be used as simple evidence-based tools to identify fetuses at risk of perinatal death. Payne et al developed a prognostic model for perinatal death in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, a leading cause of maternal/fetal morbidity and mortality.
This study aimed to externally validate the predictive performance of this model in pregnant women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy admitted between 26 and 34 weeks of gestation in Ghana.
The perinatal model was applied in the SPOT (Severe Pre-eclampsia adverse Outcome Triage) study, a cohort of women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy admitted between 26 and 34 weeks of gestation to referral facilities in Ghana. Predictive performance was assessed by calibration (calibration-in-the-large coefficient and calibration slope) and discrimination (based on the c-statistic).
Of the 543 women included in the validation analysis, 87 (16%) experienced perinatal death from delivery until hospital discharge. Predictive performance of the model was poor. The calibration-in-the-large coefficient was 1.12 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.36, 0 for good calibration), calibration slope was 0.08 (95% confidence interval, -0.21 to 0.36, 1 for good calibration), and c-statistic was 0.52 (95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.59).
This perinatal prediction model performed poorly in this cohort in Ghana. Possible reasons include differences in case mix, clinical management strategies, or data collection procedures between development and validation settings; suboptimal modeling strategies at development; or omission of important predictors. Given the burden of perinatal mortality and importance of risk stratification, new prediction model development and validation is recommended.
预测模型可作为基于证据的简单工具,用于识别有围产期死亡风险的胎儿。佩恩等人针对妊娠高血压疾病(孕产妇/胎儿发病和死亡的主要原因)的围产期死亡情况开发了一种预后模型。
本研究旨在对该模型在加纳妊娠26至34周入院的妊娠高血压疾病孕妇中的预测性能进行外部验证。
围产期模型应用于SPOT(重度子痫前期不良结局分诊)研究,该研究纳入了加纳妊娠26至34周转诊至医疗机构的妊娠高血压疾病孕妇队列。通过校准(总体校准系数和校准斜率)和区分度(基于c统计量)评估预测性能。
纳入验证分析的543名女性中,87名(16%)在分娩至出院期间发生围产期死亡。该模型的预测性能较差。总体校准系数为1.12(95%置信区间,0.87 - 1.36,良好校准应为0),校准斜率为0.08(95%置信区间,-0.21至0.36,良好校准应为1),c统计量为0.52(95%置信区间,0.44 -
0.59)。
该围产期预测模型在加纳的这一队列中表现不佳。可能的原因包括开发和验证环境之间病例组合、临床管理策略或数据收集程序的差异;开发时建模策略欠佳;或遗漏了重要预测因素。鉴于围产期死亡率的负担和风险分层的重要性,建议开发和验证新的预测模型。