Chong Yong, Shimoda Shinji, Yakushiji Hiroko, Ito Yoshikiyo, Aoki Takatoshi, Miyamoto Toshihiro, Kamimura Tomohiko, Shimono Nobuyuki, Akashi Koichi
Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hara-Sanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e85210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085210. eCollection 2014.
Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia and hematological malignancies is said to be effective on febrile netropenia (FN)-related infection and mortality; however, the emergence of antibiotic resistance has become a concern. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin prophylaxis are most commonly recommended. A significant increase in the rate of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in fecal flora has been reported following ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. The acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli after levofloxacin use has not been evaluated.
We prospectively examined the incidence of quinolone-resistant E. coli isolates recovered from stool cultures before and after levofloxacin prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia from August 2011 to May 2013. Some patients received chemotherapy multiple times.
In this trial, 68 patients were registered. Levofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates were detected from 11 and 13 of all patients before and after the prophylaxis, respectively. However, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.65). Multiple prophylaxis for sequential chemotherapy did not induce additional quinolone resistance among E. coli isolates. Interestingly, quinolone-resistant E. coli, most of which were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers, were already detected in approximately 20% of all patients before the initiation of prophylaxis. FN-related bacteremia developed in 2 patients, accompanied by a good prognosis.
Levofloxacin prophylaxis for neutropenia did not result in a significant acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli. However, we detected previous colonization of quinolone-resistant E. coli before prophylaxis, which possibly reflects the spread of ESBL. The epidemic spread of resistant E. coli as a local factor may influence strategies toward the use of quinolone prophylaxis.
中性粒细胞减少症和血液系统恶性肿瘤患者使用氟喹诺酮类药物预防发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)相关感染和死亡率据说是有效的;然而,抗生素耐药性的出现已成为一个问题。环丙沙星和左氧氟沙星预防是最常推荐的。据报道,环丙沙星预防后粪便菌群中喹诺酮耐药大肠杆菌的发生率显著增加。使用左氧氟沙星后获得喹诺酮耐药大肠杆菌的情况尚未评估。
我们前瞻性地研究了2011年8月至2013年5月期间中性粒细胞减少症患者在使用左氧氟沙星预防前后从粪便培养物中分离出的喹诺酮耐药大肠杆菌的发生率。一些患者接受了多次化疗。
在该试验中,登记了68例患者。在预防前和预防后,分别从所有患者中的11例和13例中检测到左氧氟沙星耐药大肠杆菌分离株。然而,这在统计学上无显著意义(P = 0.65)。序贯化疗的多次预防并未在大肠杆菌分离株中诱导额外的喹诺酮耐药性。有趣的是,在预防开始前,约20%的所有患者中已检测到喹诺酮耐药大肠杆菌,其中大多数是超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)产生菌。2例患者发生了FN相关菌血症,预后良好。
左氧氟沙星预防中性粒细胞减少症并未导致喹诺酮耐药大肠杆菌的显著获得。然而,我们在预防前检测到喹诺酮耐药大肠杆菌的先前定植,这可能反映了ESBL的传播。耐药大肠杆菌作为局部因素的流行传播可能影响喹诺酮预防的使用策略。