Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Department of Family Medicine & Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 21;9(1):e85620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085620. eCollection 2014.
BACKGROUND: First-line levofloxacin-based treatments eradicate Helicobacter pylori with varying success. We examined the efficacy and safety of first-line levofloxacin-based treatment in comparison to standard first-line therapy for H pylori eradication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched literature databases from Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Register of Randomized Controlled Trials through March 2013 for randomized controlled trials comparing first-line levofloxacin and standard therapy. We included randomized controlled trials conducted only on naïve H pylori infected patients in adults. A systematic review was conducted. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.2. Treatment effect was determined by relative risk with a random or fixed model by the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Seven trials were identified with 888 patients receiving 7 days of first-line levofloxacin and 894 treated with standard therapy (Amoxicillin, Clarithromycin and proton pump inhibitor) for 7 days. The overall crude eradication rate in the Levofloxacin group was 79.05% versus 81.4% in the standard group (risk ratio 0.97; 95% CI; 0.93, 1.02). The overall dropout was 46 (5.2%) in the levofloxacin group and 52 (5.8%) for standard therapy. The dizziness was more common among group who took Levofloxacin based treatment and taste disturbance was more common among group who took standard therapy. Meta-analysis of overall adverse events were similar between the two groups with a relative risk of 1.06 (95% CI 0.72, 1.57). CONCLUSION: Helicobacter pylori eradication with 7 days of Levofloxacin-based first line therapy was safe and equal compared to 7 days of standard first-line therapy.
背景:以左氧氟沙星为基础的一线治疗方案根除幽门螺杆菌的成功率不一。我们研究了以左氧氟沙星为基础的一线治疗方案与标准一线疗法相比在幽门螺杆菌根除方面的疗效和安全性。
材料和方法:我们检索了 Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 随机对照试验注册库中的文献数据库,检索时间截至 2013 年 3 月,以寻找比较左氧氟沙星和标准疗法一线治疗的随机对照试验。我们纳入了仅在未经治疗的幽门螺杆菌感染成年患者中进行的随机对照试验。进行了系统评价。采用 Review Manager 5.2 进行荟萃分析。采用 Mantel-Haenszel 法的随机或固定模型,用相对危险度评估治疗效果。
结果:共确定了 7 项试验,共 888 例患者接受 7 天左氧氟沙星治疗,894 例患者接受 7 天标准疗法(阿莫西林、克拉霉素和质子泵抑制剂)治疗。左氧氟沙星组的总体粗治愈率为 79.05%,标准组为 81.4%(风险比 0.97;95%CI:0.93,1.02)。左氧氟沙星组的总体失访率为 46(5.2%),标准疗法组为 52(5.8%)。左氧氟沙星组更常见头晕,标准疗法组更常见味觉障碍。两组总体不良反应的荟萃分析结果相似,相对风险为 1.06(95%CI:0.72,1.57)。
结论:与 7 天标准一线治疗相比,以左氧氟沙星为基础的一线治疗 7 天治疗幽门螺杆菌感染安全且疗效相当。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014-2-21
Pharmacotherapy. 2015-8
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020-9
JGH Open. 2022-11-21
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2023
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017-2
Intern Emerg Med. 2011-3-25