Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2011 Jun;26(6):785-90. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.6.785. Epub 2011 May 18.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of levofloxacin and rifaximin based quadruple regimen as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. A prospectively randomized, double-blinded, parallel group, comparative study was performed. Three hundred consecutive H. pylori positive patients were randomized to receive: omeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin (OAC); omeprazole, amoxicillin, levofloxacin (OAL); and omeprazole, amoxicillin, levofloxacin, rifaximin (OAL-R). The eradication rates in the intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were: OAC, 77.8% and 85.6%; OAL, 65.3% and 73.6%; and OAL-R, 74.5% and 80.2%. The eradication rate achieved with OAC was higher than with OAL on the ITT (P = 0.05) and PP analysis (P = 0.04). OAL-R regimen was not inferior to OAC. The frequency of moderate to severe adverse effects was significantly higher in OAC treatment group. Especially, diarrhea was most common complaint, and there was a significantly low rate of moderate to severe diarrhea with the rifaximin containing regimen. In conclusion, the levofloxacin and rifaximin based regimen comes up to the standard triple therapy, but has a limited efficacy in a Korean cohort. The rifaximin containing regimen has a very high safety profile for H. pylori eradication therapy.
本研究旨在评估左氧氟沙星和利福昔明为基础的四联方案作为幽门螺杆菌感染一线治疗的疗效。进行了一项前瞻性随机、双盲、平行组、对照研究。将 300 例连续的幽门螺杆菌阳性患者随机分为三组:奥美拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素(OAC);奥美拉唑、阿莫西林、左氧氟沙星(OAL);奥美拉唑、阿莫西林、左氧氟沙星、利福昔明(OAL-R)。意向治疗(ITT)和方案分析(PP)的根除率分别为:OAC,77.8%和 85.6%;OAL,65.3%和 73.6%;OAL-R,74.5%和 80.2%。OAC 在 ITT(P = 0.05)和 PP 分析(P = 0.04)上的根除率均高于 OAL。OAL-R 方案与 OAC 无差异。OAC 治疗组中中重度不良反应的发生率明显较高。特别是腹泻是最常见的不良反应,利福昔明组中中重度腹泻的发生率明显较低。总之,左氧氟沙星和利福昔明为基础的方案与标准三联疗法相当,但在韩国队列中疗效有限。含利福昔明的方案对幽门螺杆菌根除治疗具有极高的安全性。