College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, P, O, Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2014 Jan 27;10:9. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-10-9.
There is continued reliance on conventional veterinary drugs including anthelmintics, to some of which resistance has developed. Loss of indigenous technical knowledge (ITK) from societies affects the opportunities for utilization of ethnopharmacological practices unless properly documented. This study was conducted to identify common traditional practices using medicinal plants against helminthosis and other livestock diseases in Mpigi and Gulu districts of Uganda.
Seven focus group discussions with ten farmers per group plus 18 key informant interviews were held in each district from August to November 2011. Ranking was used to quantify disease burdens and to identify priority livestock and breeds. Samples of each plant were submitted to Makerere University herbarium for identification and documentation. The local name, relative availability and International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) status were recorded.
Seventy six farmers in Mpigi and 74 in Gulu were interviewed. Theileriosis and helminthosis were the most common disease conditions in cattle and goats, respectively. Forty plant species within 34 genera from 22 botanical families were identified, with 20 of these used against helminthosis. Other plants treated wounds and ecto-parasites, theileriosis, retained placenta and bovine ephemeral fever. Non-plant practices (7) and plants cited were used in combination depending on availability. Males older than 40 years had most ethnopharmacological knowledge. Most plants (75%, n = 40) were common, but 10 were rare. IUCN status was not evaluated for 95% of these plants. Conventional and traditional drug use in Gulu and Mpigi districts was different (χ2 = 24; p < 0.001). The scientific, English, Luganda and Acholi names of all plants and their availability within the communities are documented herein.
This is the first detailed livestock-related ethnopharmacological study in Gulu district. Farmers in Uganda are still using a variety of practices to treat livestock ailments. Scientific validation and evaluation of conservation status are urgently needed to ensure future availability and knowledge about these plant resources.
目前仍然依赖传统兽医药物,包括驱虫药,但其中一些已经产生了耐药性。如果没有适当的记录,社会丧失本土技术知识(ITK)会影响到利用民族药理学实践的机会。本研究旨在确定在乌干达姆皮吉和古卢地区针对蠕虫病和其他牲畜疾病使用药用植物的常见传统做法。
2011 年 8 月至 11 月期间,在每个地区进行了 7 次焦点小组讨论,每个小组有 10 名农民参加,加上 18 名关键信息提供者访谈。使用排名来量化疾病负担,并确定优先的牲畜和品种。提交每种植物的样本到马凯雷雷大学标本馆进行鉴定和记录。记录了植物的当地名称、相对可用性和国际自然保护联盟(IUCN)地位。
在姆皮吉采访了 76 名农民,在古卢采访了 74 名农民。泰勒虫病和蠕虫病分别是牛和山羊最常见的疾病。确定了 34 个属的 76 种植物,其中 20 种用于治疗蠕虫病。其他植物用于治疗伤口和外寄生虫、泰勒虫病、胎衣滞留和牛暂时发热。非植物疗法(7 种)和引用的植物根据可用性结合使用。年龄在 40 岁以上的男性拥有最多的民族药理学知识。大多数植物(75%,n=40)很常见,但有 10 种很罕见。对于这些植物中的 95%,没有评估 IUCN 地位。古卢和姆皮吉地区的传统和传统药物使用情况不同(χ2=24;p<0.001)。本文记录了所有植物的科学、英语、卢干达语和阿乔利语名称及其在社区内的可用性。
这是古卢区首次详细的与牲畜相关的民族药理学研究。乌干达的农民仍在使用各种方法来治疗牲畜疾病。迫切需要进行科学验证和评估保护状况,以确保这些植物资源的未来可用性和知识。