Rogers Benjamin A, Ingram Paul R, Runnegar Naomi, Pitman Matthew C, Freeman Joshua T, Athan Eugene, Havers Sally M, Sidjabat Hanna E, Jones Mark, Gunning Earleen, De Almeida Mary, Styles Kaylene, Paterson David L
The University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(4):2126-34. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02052-13. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
By global standards, the prevalence of community-onset expanded-spectrum-cephalosporin-resistant (ESC-R) Escherichia coli remains low in Australia and New Zealand. Of concern, our countries are in a unique position, with high extramural resistance pressure from close population and trade links to Asia-Pacific neighbors with high ESC-R E. coli rates. We aimed to characterize the risks and dynamics of community-onset ESC-R E. coli infection in our low-prevalence region. A case-control methodology was used. Patients with ESC-R E. coli or ESC-susceptible E. coli isolated from blood or urine were recruited at six geographically dispersed tertiary care hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Epidemiological data were prospectively collected, and bacteria were retained for analysis. In total, 182 patients (91 cases and 91 controls) were recruited. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors for ESC-R among E. coli strains, including birth on the Indian subcontinent (odds ratio [OR]=11.13, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=2.17 to 56.98, P=0.003), urinary tract infection in the past year (per-infection OR=1.430, 95% CI=1.13 to 1.82, P=0.003), travel to southeast Asia, China, the Indian subcontinent, Africa, and the Middle East (OR=3.089, 95% CI=1.29 to 7.38, P=0.011), prior exposure to trimethoprim with or without sulfamethoxazole and with or without an expanded-spectrum cephalosporin (OR=3.665, 95% CI=1.30 to 10.35, P=0.014), and health care exposure in the previous 6 months (OR=3.16, 95% CI=1.54 to 6.46, P=0.02). Among our ESC-R E. coli strains, the blaCTX-M ESBLs were dominant (83% of ESC-R E. coli strains), and the worldwide pandemic ST-131 clone was frequent (45% of ESC-R E. coli strains). In our low-prevalence setting, ESC-R among community-onset E. coli strains may be associated with both "export" from health care facilities into the community and direct "import" into the community from high-prevalence regions.
按照全球标准,社区获得性耐超广谱头孢菌素(ESC-R)大肠杆菌在澳大利亚和新西兰的流行率仍然较低。令人担忧的是,我们这两个国家处于独特的位置,由于与亚太地区耐ESC-R大肠杆菌感染率较高的邻国存在密切的人口和贸易联系,面临着较高的院外耐药压力。我们旨在描述在我们这个低流行率地区社区获得性ESC-R大肠杆菌感染的风险和动态情况。采用了病例对照研究方法。从澳大利亚和新西兰六家地理位置分散的三级医疗机构招募了血液或尿液中分离出ESC-R大肠杆菌或对ESC敏感的大肠杆菌的患者。前瞻性收集流行病学数据,并保留细菌用于分析。总共招募了182名患者(91例病例和91例对照)。多因素逻辑回归确定了大肠杆菌菌株中ESC-R的危险因素,包括在印度次大陆出生(比值比[OR]=11.13,95%置信区间[95%CI]=2.17至56.98,P=0.003)、过去一年发生尿路感染(每次感染OR=1.430,95%CI=1.13至1.82,P=0.003)、前往东南亚、中国、印度次大陆、非洲和中东地区旅行(OR=3.089,95%CI=1.29至7.38,P=0.011)、既往暴露于含或不含磺胺甲恶唑的甲氧苄啶且含或不含超广谱头孢菌素(OR=3.665,95%CI=1.30至10.35,P=0.014)以及前6个月内有医疗保健接触史(OR=3.16,95%CI=1.54至6.46,P=0.02)。在我们分离的ESC-R大肠杆菌菌株中,blaCTX-M型超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)占主导(占ESC-R大肠杆菌菌株的83%),全球大流行的ST-131克隆株很常见(占ESC-R大肠杆菌菌株的45%)。在我们这个低流行率环境中,社区获得性大肠杆菌菌株中的ESC-R可能与医疗机构“输出”到社区以及从高流行率地区直接“输入”到社区均有关。