Suppr超能文献

未另行指定的进食障碍和暴饮暴食障碍中的人格障碍:共病研究的荟萃分析

Personality disorders in eating disorder not otherwise specified and binge eating disorder: a meta-analysis of comorbidity studies.

作者信息

Friborg Oddgeir, Martinussen Monica, Kaiser Sabine, Øvergård Karl Tore, Martinsen Egil W, Schmierer Phöbe, Rosenvinge Jan Harald

机构信息

*Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway; †Department of Psychiatric Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; ‡The Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway; and §Clinic for Mental Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014 Feb;202(2):119-25. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000080.

Abstract

A meta-analysis was conducted to identify the proportion of comorbid personality disorders (PDs) in patients with eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) and binge eating disorder (BED). A search identified 20 articles in the period of 1987 to 2010. For EDNOS and BED, the comorbid proportions for any PD were 0.38 and 0.29, respectively; for cluster C PDs, 0.38 and 0.30, respectively (avoidant PD, 0.18 and 0.12, and obsessive-compulsive PD, 0.11 and 0.10, respectively); and for cluster B PDs, 0.25 and 0.11, respectively (borderline, 0.12 and 0.10). This pattern converged with findings on anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, except being lower. Because the comorbidity profiles for EDNOS and BED were highly similar, their underlying PD pathology seems similar. Few moderators were significant, except for interviews yielding lower estimates than that of questionnaires. The variance statistic for any PD comorbidity was wide for EDNOS and narrow for BED, thus partly supporting BED as a distinct eating disorder category and EDNOS as a potentially more severe condition than BED.

摘要

进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定未另行指定的饮食失调(EDNOS)和暴饮暴食症(BED)患者中共病人格障碍(PD)的比例。一项检索在1987年至2010年期间确定了20篇文章。对于EDNOS和BED,任何PD的共病比例分别为0.38和0.29;对于C类PD,分别为0.38和0.30(回避型PD分别为0.18和0.12,强迫型PD分别为0.11和0.10);对于B类PD,分别为0.25和0.11(边缘型分别为0.12和0.10)。这种模式与神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症的研究结果一致,只是比例较低。由于EDNOS和BED的共病情况高度相似,它们潜在的PD病理似乎也相似。除了访谈得出的估计值低于问卷调查外,几乎没有显著的调节因素。EDNOS的任何PD共病的方差统计范围较宽,而BED的较窄,因此部分支持BED作为一种独特的饮食失调类别,以及EDNOS作为一种可能比BED更严重的病症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验