• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

没有随机对照试验支持美国预防服务工作组关于在初级保健中筛查抑郁症的指南:系统评价。

There are no randomized controlled trials that support the United States Preventive Services Task Force Guideline on screening for depression in primary care: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2014 Jan 28;12:13. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-13.

DOI:10.1186/1741-7015-12-13
PMID:24472580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3922694/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening adults for depression in primary care settings when staff-assisted depression management programs are available. This recommendation, however, is based on evidence from depression management programs conducted with patients already identified as depressed, even though screening is intended to identify depressed patients not already recognized or treated. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate whether there is evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that depression screening benefits patients in primary care, using an explicit definition of screening.

METHODS

We re-evaluated RCTs included in the 2009 USPSTF evidence review on depression screening, including only trials that compared depression outcomes between screened and non-screened patients and met the following three criteria: determined patient eligibility and randomized prior to screening; excluded patients already diagnosed with a recent episode of depression or already being treated for depression; and provided the same level of depression treatment services to patients identified as depressed in the screening and non-screening trial arms. We also reviewed studies included in a recent Cochrane systematic review, but not the USPSTF review; conducted a focused search to update the USPSTF review; and reviewed trial registries.

RESULTS

Of the nine RCTs included in the USPSTF review, four fulfilled none of three criteria for a test of depression screening, four fulfilled one of three criteria, and one fulfilled two of three criteria. There were two additional RCTs included only in the Cochrane review, and each fulfilled one of three criteria. No eligible RCTs were found via the updated review.

CONCLUSIONS

The USPSTF recommendation to screen adults for depression in primary care settings when staff-assisted depression management programs are available is not supported by evidence from any RCTs that are directly relevant to the recommendation. The USPSTF should re-evaluate this recommendation. Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/14 REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (#CRD42013004276).

摘要

背景

美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)建议在初级保健环境中为工作人员辅助的抑郁症管理计划提供时,对成年人进行抑郁症筛查。然而,这一建议是基于已经确定为抑郁症的患者进行的抑郁症管理计划的证据,尽管筛查旨在识别尚未被识别或治疗的抑郁症患者。本系统评价的目的是评估是否有随机对照试验(RCT)的证据表明,在初级保健中,使用明确的筛查定义,对患者进行抑郁症筛查是否有益。

方法

我们重新评估了 2009 年 USPSTF 抑郁筛查证据审查中纳入的 RCT,仅纳入了那些比较筛查患者和非筛查患者之间抑郁结果的试验,并且符合以下三个标准:确定患者的资格并在筛查前随机分组;排除已经诊断出最近发作的抑郁症或已经接受抑郁症治疗的患者;为筛查和非筛查试验臂中确定为抑郁症的患者提供相同水平的抑郁治疗服务。我们还审查了最近 Cochrane 系统评价中纳入的研究,但未包括 USPSTF 审查;进行了重点搜索以更新 USPSTF 审查;并审查了试验登记处。

结果

USPSTF 审查中纳入的九项 RCT 中,四项均不符合三项抑郁症筛查试验标准中的任何一项,四项符合三项标准中的一项,一项符合三项标准中的两项。在 Cochrane 审查中还纳入了另外两项 RCT,每一项都符合三项标准中的一项。通过更新的审查没有发现符合条件的 RCT。

结论

USPSTF 建议在工作人员辅助的抑郁症管理计划可用时,在初级保健环境中对成年人进行抑郁症筛查的建议,没有任何直接相关建议的 RCT 证据支持。USPSTF 应重新评估这一建议。请参阅相关文章:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/14 注册:PROSPERO(#CRD42013004276)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10ef/3922694/0b5ec7877218/1741-7015-12-13-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10ef/3922694/ed0a25285d03/1741-7015-12-13-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10ef/3922694/0b5ec7877218/1741-7015-12-13-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10ef/3922694/ed0a25285d03/1741-7015-12-13-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10ef/3922694/0b5ec7877218/1741-7015-12-13-2.jpg

相似文献

1
There are no randomized controlled trials that support the United States Preventive Services Task Force Guideline on screening for depression in primary care: a systematic review.没有随机对照试验支持美国预防服务工作组关于在初级保健中筛查抑郁症的指南:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2014 Jan 28;12:13. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-13.
2
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
3
Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression.产后抑郁症的抗抑郁治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 11;2014(9):CD002018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002018.pub2.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Antioxidants for male subfertility.用于男性生育力低下的抗氧化剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(12):CD007411. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007411.pub3. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
6
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Interventions for the prevention and management of oropharyngeal candidiasis associated with HIV infection in adults and children.成人及儿童中与HIV感染相关的口腔念珠菌病的预防及管理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD003940. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003940.pub3.
10
Screening for prostate cancer.前列腺癌筛查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD004720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to attempted emulation of a randomised depression screening trial.对一项随机抑郁症筛查试验模拟尝试的回应
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Apr 30;46:101075. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101075. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Screening for depression in children and adolescents in primary care or non-mental health settings: a systematic review update.基层医疗保健或非心理健康环境中儿童和青少年的抑郁筛查:系统评价更新。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 31;13(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02447-3.
3
Effectiveness of health checkup with depression screening on depression treatment and outcomes in middle-aged and older adults: a target trial emulation study.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicalising unhappiness: new classification of depression risks more patients being put on drug treatment from which they will not benefit.将不快乐医学化:抑郁症的新分类使更多患者接受药物治疗,而他们并不会从中受益。
BMJ. 2013 Dec 9;347:f7140. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7140.
2
Recommendations on screening for depression in adults.成人抑郁症筛查建议。
CMAJ. 2013 Jun 11;185(9):775-82. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130403. Epub 2013 May 13.
3
Why screening for depression in primary care is impractical.为何在初级保健中筛查抑郁症不切实际。
抑郁症筛查健康检查对中老年成年人抑郁症治疗及结局的有效性:一项目标试验模拟研究
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Nov 23;43:100978. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100978. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
'Optimal' cutoff selection in studies of depression screening tool accuracy using the PHQ-9, EPDS, or HADS-D: A meta-research study.使用 PHQ-9、EPDS 或 HADS-D 进行抑郁筛查工具准确性研究中的“最佳”截断值选择:一项元研究。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2023 Sep;32(3):e1956. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1956. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
5
Accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening to detect major depression: updated systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.患者健康问卷-9 用于筛查主要抑郁症的准确性:更新的系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2021 Oct 5;375:n2183. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2183.
6
The efficacy of automated feedback after internet-based depression screening: Study protocol of the German, three-armed, randomised controlled trial DISCOVER.基于互联网的抑郁症筛查后自动反馈的效果:德国三臂随机对照试验DISCOVER的研究方案
Internet Interv. 2021 Jul 21;25:100435. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100435. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) to screen for major depression: systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.医院焦虑和抑郁量表抑郁分量表(HADS-D)筛查重度抑郁症的准确性:系统评价和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2021 May 10;373:n972. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n972.
8
Improving the precision of depression diagnosis in general practice: a cluster-randomized trial.提高全科医学中抑郁症诊断的精确性:一项整群随机试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 May 7;22(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01432-w.
9
Screening for depression in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review update.儿童和青少年抑郁筛查:系统评价更新的方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 12;10(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01568-3.
10
Depression screening using patient-targeted feedback in general practices: study protocol of the German multicentre GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomised controlled trial.在基层医疗中使用针对患者的反馈进行抑郁症筛查:德国多中心GET.FEEDBACK.GP随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 21;10(9):e035973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035973.
CMAJ. 2013 Jun 11;185(9):753-4. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.130634. Epub 2013 May 13.
4
Clinician-identified depression in community settings: concordance with structured-interview diagnoses.社区环境中临床医生识别的抑郁症:与结构性访谈诊断的一致性。
Psychother Psychosom. 2013;82(3):161-9. doi: 10.1159/000345968. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
5
The costs associated with antidepressant use in depression and anxiety in community-living older adults.社区老年抑郁症和焦虑症患者使用抗抑郁药的成本。
Can J Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;58(4):201-9. doi: 10.1177/070674371305800405.
6
Systematic depression screening in high-risk patients attending primary care: a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial.高危患者在基层医疗就诊时进行系统性抑郁筛查:一项实用的整群随机试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Mar 13;13:83. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-83.
7
Does evidence support the American Heart Association's recommendation to screen patients for depression in cardiovascular care? An updated systematic review.是否有证据支持美国心脏协会在心血管护理中筛查患者抑郁症的建议?一项更新的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052654. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
8
Diagnosis and treatment of depression following routine screening in patients with coronary heart disease or diabetes: a database cohort study.常规筛查冠心病或糖尿病患者后的抑郁诊断和治疗:数据库队列研究。
Psychol Med. 2013 Mar;43(3):529-37. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712001481. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
9
TRIPPD: a practice-based network effectiveness study of postpartum depression screening and management.TRIPPD:产后抑郁症筛查和管理的基于实践的网络有效性研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;10(4):320-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1418.
10
Analysis of decisions made in meta-analyses of depression screening and the risk of confirmation bias: a case study.抑郁筛查的荟萃分析决策分析与确认偏倚风险:案例研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jun 12;12:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-76.