• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于互联网的抑郁症筛查后自动反馈的效果:德国三臂随机对照试验DISCOVER的研究方案

The efficacy of automated feedback after internet-based depression screening: Study protocol of the German, three-armed, randomised controlled trial DISCOVER.

作者信息

Sikorski Franziska, König Hans-Helmut, Wegscheider Karl, Zapf Antonia, Löwe Bernd, Kohlmann Sebastian

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Internet Interv. 2021 Jul 21;25:100435. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100435. eCollection 2021 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.invent.2021.100435
PMID:34401394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8350593/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression is one of the most disabling disorders worldwide, yet it often remains undetected. One promising approach to address both early detection and disease burden is depression screening followed by direct feedback to patients. Evidence suggests that individuals often seek information regarding mental health on the internet. Thus, internet-based screening with automated feedback has great potential to address individuals with undetected depression.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether automated feedback after internet-based depression screening reduces depression severity as compared to no feedback.

METHODS

The internet-based, observer-blinded DISCOVER RCT aims to recruit a total of 1074 individuals. Participants will be screened for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). In case of a positive screening result (PHQ-9 ≥ 10), participants with undetected depression will be randomised into one of three balanced study arms to receive either (a) no feedback (control arm), (b) standard feedback, or (c) tailored feedback on their screening result. The tailored feedback version will be adapted to participants' characteristics, i.e. symptom profile, preferences, and demographic characteristics. The primary hypothesis is that feedback reduces depression severity six months after screening compared to no feedback. The secondary hypothesis is that tailored feedback is more efficacious compared to standard feedback. Further outcomes are depression care, help-seeking behaviour, health-related quality of life, anxiety, somatic symptom severity, intervention acceptance, illness beliefs, adverse events, and a health economic evaluation. Follow-ups will be conducted one month and six months after screening by self-report questionnaires and clinical interviews. According to a statistical analysis plan, the primary outcome will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis applying multilevel modelling.

DISCUSSION

The results of the DISCOVER RCT will inform about how automated feedback after internet-based screening could improve early detection and resolution of depression. Ways of dissemination and how the trial can contribute to an understanding of help-seeking behaviour processes will be discussed. If the results show that automated feedback after internet-based depression screening can reduce depression severity, the intervention could be easily implemented and might substantially reduce the disease burden of individuals with undetected depression.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

The study is approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hamburg Medical Association.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov in November 2020 (identifier: NCT04633096).

摘要

背景

抑郁症是全球最具致残性的疾病之一,但往往未被发现。一种有望解决早期检测和疾病负担问题的方法是进行抑郁症筛查,然后直接向患者反馈结果。有证据表明,人们经常在互联网上寻求有关心理健康的信息。因此,基于互联网的自动反馈筛查对于发现未被诊断的抑郁症患者具有巨大潜力。

目的

确定与无反馈相比,基于互联网的抑郁症筛查后的自动反馈是否能降低抑郁严重程度。

方法

基于互联网的、观察者盲法的DISCOVER随机对照试验旨在招募总共1074名个体。使用患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)对参与者进行抑郁症筛查。如果筛查结果为阳性(PHQ-9≥10),未被发现患有抑郁症的参与者将被随机分为三个均衡的研究组之一,以接受以下三种情况之一:(a)无反馈(对照组),(b)标准反馈,或(c)根据其筛查结果提供的个性化反馈。个性化反馈版本将根据参与者的特征进行调整,即症状概况、偏好和人口统计学特征。主要假设是,与无反馈相比,反馈在筛查后六个月可降低抑郁严重程度。次要假设是,与标准反馈相比,个性化反馈更有效。其他结果包括抑郁护理、求助行为、健康相关生活质量、焦虑、躯体症状严重程度、干预接受度、疾病认知、不良事件以及健康经济学评估。筛查后一个月和六个月将通过自我报告问卷和临床访谈进行随访。根据统计分析计划,主要结果将采用多水平模型在意向性分析的基础上进行分析。

讨论

DISCOVER随机对照试验的结果将为基于互联网筛查后的自动反馈如何改善抑郁症的早期检测和解决提供信息。将讨论传播方式以及该试验如何有助于理解求助行为过程。如果结果表明基于互联网的抑郁症筛查后的自动反馈可以降低抑郁严重程度,那么该干预措施可以很容易地实施,并可能大幅减轻未被发现患有抑郁症个体的疾病负担。

伦理批准

该研究已获得汉堡医学协会伦理委员会的批准。

试验注册

该试验于2020年11月在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(标识符:NCT04633096)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd35/8350593/31ed3ec73c07/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd35/8350593/d6868a4e3d48/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd35/8350593/6a344b168ab0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd35/8350593/31ed3ec73c07/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd35/8350593/d6868a4e3d48/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd35/8350593/6a344b168ab0/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd35/8350593/31ed3ec73c07/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
The efficacy of automated feedback after internet-based depression screening: Study protocol of the German, three-armed, randomised controlled trial DISCOVER.基于互联网的抑郁症筛查后自动反馈的效果:德国三臂随机对照试验DISCOVER的研究方案
Internet Interv. 2021 Jul 21;25:100435. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100435. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
The efficacy of automated feedback after internet-based depression screening (DISCOVER): an observer-masked, three-armed, randomised controlled trial in Germany.基于互联网的抑郁症筛查(DISCOVER)后自动化反馈的效果:德国一项观察者设盲、三臂、随机对照试验。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Jul;6(7):e446-e457. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00070-0.
3
Depression screening using patient-targeted feedback in general practices: study protocol of the German multicentre GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomised controlled trial.在基层医疗中使用针对患者的反馈进行抑郁症筛查:德国多中心GET.FEEDBACK.GP随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 21;10(9):e035973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035973.
4
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
5
Testing an early online intervention for the treatment of disturbed sleep during the COVID-19 pandemic (Sleep COVID-19): structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.测试针对 COVID-19 大流行期间睡眠障碍的早期在线干预措施(睡眠 COVID-19):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Aug 8;21(1):704. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04644-0.
6
Clinical effectiveness of patient-targeted feedback following depression screening in general practice (GET.FEEDBACK.GP): an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, three-arm, observer-blinded, randomised controlled trial in Germany.全科医疗中抑郁症筛查后针对患者的反馈的临床效果(GET.FEEDBACK.GP):一项由研究者发起的、前瞻性、多中心、三臂、观察者盲法的德国随机对照试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Apr;11(4):262-273. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00035-X. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
8
CovEMERALD: Assessing the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of remotely delivered Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing following Covid-19 related critical illness: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.CovEMERALD:评估新冠相关危重病后远程提供眼动脱敏再处理的可行性和初步效果:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Nov 17;21(1):929. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04805-1.
9
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of guided internet-based interventions in the indicated prevention of depression in green professions (PROD-A): study protocol of a 36-month follow-up pragmatic randomized controlled trial.基于互联网的有针对性预防抑郁的引导式干预在绿色职业人群中的临床效果和成本效益研究(PROD-A):一项 36 个月随访实用随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 9;19(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2244-y.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Heterogeneity in Effects of Automated Results Feedback After Online Depression Screening: Secondary Machine-Learning Based Analysis of the DISCOVER Trial.在线抑郁筛查后自动结果反馈效果的异质性:基于机器学习的DISCOVER试验二次分析
JMIR AI. 2025 Aug 21;4:e70001. doi: 10.2196/70001.
2
Do illness beliefs predict uptake of depression treatment after web-based depression screening? A secondary analysis of the DISCOVER RCT.疾病认知能否预测基于网络的抑郁症筛查后抑郁症治疗的接受情况?对DISCOVER随机对照试验的二次分析。
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Jul 27;28(1):e301666. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301666.
3
Uncovering hidden depression: the critical role of depression screening in sleep disorders at U.S. sleep centers.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimization of the Mainzelliste software for fast privacy-preserving record linkage.优化 Mainzelliste 软件以实现快速的隐私保护记录链接。
J Transl Med. 2021 Jan 15;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02678-1.
2
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 369 种疾病和伤害导致的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
3
Depression screening using patient-targeted feedback in general practices: study protocol of the German multicentre GET.FEEDBACK.GP randomised controlled trial.
揭示隐匿性抑郁症:抑郁症筛查在美国睡眠中心睡眠障碍中的关键作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 25;16:1449360. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1449360. eCollection 2025.
4
Potential Harms of Feedback After Web-Based Depression Screening: Secondary Analysis of Negative Effects in the Randomized Controlled DISCOVER Trial.基于网络的抑郁症筛查后反馈的潜在危害:随机对照DISCOVER试验中负面影响的二次分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e59476. doi: 10.2196/59476.
5
"Salud Mamaria", an internet-based psychoeducational program during the breast cancer diagnosis process: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.“Salud Mamaria”,一项乳腺癌诊断过程中的基于互联网的心理教育项目:一项随机对照试验方案
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Nov 26;43:101397. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101397. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Internet-based self-administered intervention to reduce anxiety and depression symptomatology and improve well-being in 7 countries: protocol of a randomized control trial.基于互联网的自我管理干预措施以减轻7个国家的焦虑和抑郁症状并改善幸福感:一项随机对照试验方案
Front Psychol. 2024 May 7;15:1279847. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1279847. eCollection 2024.
7
How adults with suspected depressive disorder experience online depression screening: A qualitative interview study.疑似患有抑郁症的成年人如何体验在线抑郁症筛查:一项定性访谈研究。
Internet Interv. 2023 Oct 23;34:100685. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100685. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
International comparability of depression scores from self-report scales: opportunities and challenges.自我报告量表中抑郁得分的国际可比性:机遇与挑战。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Jun 10;31:100668. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100668. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Did online information seeking for depression increase during COVID-19 lockdown times? A google trend analysis on data from Germany and the UK.在新冠疫情封锁期间,因抑郁症而进行的在线信息搜索量增加了吗?对来自德国和英国的数据进行的谷歌趋势分析。
J Affect Disord Rep. 2023 Jul;13:100587. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2023.100587. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
10
From the identification of biopsychosocial risk factors to an increase in pain-related self-efficacy (IDRIS) - The online-based conveyance of an explanatory model for chronic back pain: Study protocol of a cohort multiple randomized controlled trial.从识别生物心理社会风险因素到提高疼痛相关自我效能感(IDRIS)——慢性背痛解释模型的在线传播:一项队列多重随机对照试验的研究方案
Internet Interv. 2022 Oct 27;30:100582. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100582. eCollection 2022 Dec.
在基层医疗中使用针对患者的反馈进行抑郁症筛查:德国多中心GET.FEEDBACK.GP随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 21;10(9):e035973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035973.
4
Patient involvement in developing a patient-targeted feedback intervention after depression screening in primary care within the randomized controlled trial GET.FEEDBACK.GP.患者参与在初级保健中进行抑郁筛查后的随机对照试验 GET.FEEDBACK.GP 中制定以患者为目标的反馈干预措施。
Health Expect. 2021 May;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):95-112. doi: 10.1111/hex.13039. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
5
Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis.患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)筛查检测主要抑郁症的准确性:个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Apr 9;365:l1476. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1476.
6
Interformat reliability of the patient health questionnaire: Validation of the computerized version of the PHQ-9.患者健康问卷的信息格式可靠性:PHQ-9计算机化版本的验证
Internet Interv. 2016 Jun 27;5:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.06.006. eCollection 2016 Sep.
7
Reporting randomised trials of social and psychological interventions: the CONSORT-SPI 2018 Extension.社会和心理干预随机试验的报告:CONSORT-SPI 2018扩展版
Trials. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2733-1.
8
Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements.临床综述:精神健康智能手机应用程序的用户参与情况:证据、理论与改进。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Aug;21(3):116-119. doi: 10.1136/eb-2018-102891. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
9
Patient Perspectives on Strengths and Challenges of Therapist-Assisted Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behaviour Therapy: Using the Patient Voice to Improve Care.患者对治疗师辅助的互联网认知行为疗法的优势与挑战的看法:运用患者心声改善治疗
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Oct;54(7):944-950. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0286-0. Epub 2018 May 26.
10
German Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.德国 EQ-5D-5L 价值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jun;36(6):663-674. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0615-8.