Suppr超能文献

肺腺癌原位、微浸润腺癌和非黏液性贴壁为主型浸润性腺癌在 I 期疾病患者中的预后意义。

Prognostic significance of adenocarcinoma in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, and nonmucinous lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinoma of the lung in patients with stage I disease.

机构信息

*Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Service †Department of Pathology ¶Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics #Department of Medicine, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Thoracic Oncology Service **Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY ‡Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa §Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto ∥Department of Diagnostic Pathology, the Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Apr;38(4):448-60. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000134.

Abstract

According to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification, the lepidic predominant pattern consists of 3 subtypes: adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and nonmucinous lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinoma. We reviewed tumor slides from 1038 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma, recording the percentage of each histologic pattern and measuring the invasive tumor size. Tumors were classified according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification: 2 were AIS, 34 MIA, and 103 lepidic predominant invasive. Cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) was used to estimate the probability of recurrence. Patients with AIS and MIA experienced no recurrences. Patients with lepidic predominant invasive tumors had a lower risk for recurrence (5-y CIR, 8%) than nonlepidic predominant tumors (n=899; 19%; P=0.003). Patients with >50% lepidic pattern tumors experienced no recurrences (n=84), those with >10% to 50% lepidic pattern tumors had an intermediate risk for recurrence (n=344; 5-y CIR, 12%), and those with ≤10% lepidic pattern tumors had the highest risk (n=610; 22%; P<0.001). CIR was lower for patients with ≤2 cm tumors than for those with >2 to 3 cm tumors (for both total and invasive tumor size), with the difference more pronounced for invasive tumor size (5-y CIR, 13% vs. 21% [total size; P=0.022] and 12% vs. 27% [invasive size; P<0.001]). Most patients with lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma who experienced a recurrence had potential risk factors, including sublobar resection with close margins (≤0.5 cm; n=2), 20% to 30% micropapillary component (n=2), and lymphatic or vascular invasion (n=2). It therefore may be possible to identify lepidic predominant adenocarcinomas that carry a low or high risk for recurrence.

摘要

根据 IASLC/ATS/ERS 分类,贴壁为主型模式包括 3 个亚型:原位腺癌(AIS)、微浸润腺癌(MIA)和非黏液性贴壁为主型浸润性腺癌。我们回顾了 1038 例 I 期肺腺癌患者的肿瘤切片,记录了每种组织学模式的百分比,并测量了侵袭性肿瘤的大小。根据 IASLC/ATS/ERS 分类对肿瘤进行分类:2 例为 AIS,34 例为 MIA,103 例为贴壁为主型浸润性腺癌。累积复发率(CIR)用于估计复发的概率。AIS 和 MIA 患者无复发。贴壁为主型浸润性肿瘤患者的复发风险较低(5 年 CIR,8%),而非贴壁为主型肿瘤患者(n=899;19%;P=0.003)。>50%贴壁模式肿瘤患者无复发(n=84),>10%至 50%贴壁模式肿瘤患者复发风险中等(n=344;5 年 CIR,12%),≤10%贴壁模式肿瘤患者复发风险最高(n=610;22%;P<0.001)。与>2 至 3 cm 肿瘤患者相比,≤2 cm 肿瘤患者的 CIR 较低(对于总肿瘤大小和侵袭性肿瘤大小均如此),侵袭性肿瘤大小的差异更为显著(5 年 CIR,13%比 21%[总大小;P=0.022]和 12%比 27%[侵袭性大小;P<0.001])。大多数发生复发的贴壁为主型腺癌患者具有潜在的危险因素,包括亚肺叶切除伴切缘接近(≤0.5 cm;n=2)、20%至 30%微乳头状成分(n=2)和淋巴管或血管侵犯(n=2)。因此,可能可以识别出具有低或高复发风险的贴壁为主型腺癌。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Whence lepidic?: the history of a Canadian neologism.叶状的来源:一个加拿大新词的历史。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013 Dec;137(12):1822-4. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0144-HP. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
7
Relationship between lung adenocarcinoma histological subtype and patient prognosis.肺腺癌组织学亚型与患者预后的关系。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;20(1):12-8. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.12.02073. Epub 2013 Jan 31.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验