*Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Service †Department of Pathology ¶Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics #Department of Medicine, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Thoracic Oncology Service **Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY ‡Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa §Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto ∥Department of Diagnostic Pathology, the Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Apr;38(4):448-60. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000134.
According to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification, the lepidic predominant pattern consists of 3 subtypes: adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and nonmucinous lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinoma. We reviewed tumor slides from 1038 patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma, recording the percentage of each histologic pattern and measuring the invasive tumor size. Tumors were classified according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification: 2 were AIS, 34 MIA, and 103 lepidic predominant invasive. Cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) was used to estimate the probability of recurrence. Patients with AIS and MIA experienced no recurrences. Patients with lepidic predominant invasive tumors had a lower risk for recurrence (5-y CIR, 8%) than nonlepidic predominant tumors (n=899; 19%; P=0.003). Patients with >50% lepidic pattern tumors experienced no recurrences (n=84), those with >10% to 50% lepidic pattern tumors had an intermediate risk for recurrence (n=344; 5-y CIR, 12%), and those with ≤10% lepidic pattern tumors had the highest risk (n=610; 22%; P<0.001). CIR was lower for patients with ≤2 cm tumors than for those with >2 to 3 cm tumors (for both total and invasive tumor size), with the difference more pronounced for invasive tumor size (5-y CIR, 13% vs. 21% [total size; P=0.022] and 12% vs. 27% [invasive size; P<0.001]). Most patients with lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma who experienced a recurrence had potential risk factors, including sublobar resection with close margins (≤0.5 cm; n=2), 20% to 30% micropapillary component (n=2), and lymphatic or vascular invasion (n=2). It therefore may be possible to identify lepidic predominant adenocarcinomas that carry a low or high risk for recurrence.
根据 IASLC/ATS/ERS 分类,贴壁为主型模式包括 3 个亚型:原位腺癌(AIS)、微浸润腺癌(MIA)和非黏液性贴壁为主型浸润性腺癌。我们回顾了 1038 例 I 期肺腺癌患者的肿瘤切片,记录了每种组织学模式的百分比,并测量了侵袭性肿瘤的大小。根据 IASLC/ATS/ERS 分类对肿瘤进行分类:2 例为 AIS,34 例为 MIA,103 例为贴壁为主型浸润性腺癌。累积复发率(CIR)用于估计复发的概率。AIS 和 MIA 患者无复发。贴壁为主型浸润性肿瘤患者的复发风险较低(5 年 CIR,8%),而非贴壁为主型肿瘤患者(n=899;19%;P=0.003)。>50%贴壁模式肿瘤患者无复发(n=84),>10%至 50%贴壁模式肿瘤患者复发风险中等(n=344;5 年 CIR,12%),≤10%贴壁模式肿瘤患者复发风险最高(n=610;22%;P<0.001)。与>2 至 3 cm 肿瘤患者相比,≤2 cm 肿瘤患者的 CIR 较低(对于总肿瘤大小和侵袭性肿瘤大小均如此),侵袭性肿瘤大小的差异更为显著(5 年 CIR,13%比 21%[总大小;P=0.022]和 12%比 27%[侵袭性大小;P<0.001])。大多数发生复发的贴壁为主型腺癌患者具有潜在的危险因素,包括亚肺叶切除伴切缘接近(≤0.5 cm;n=2)、20%至 30%微乳头状成分(n=2)和淋巴管或血管侵犯(n=2)。因此,可能可以识别出具有低或高复发风险的贴壁为主型腺癌。