Suppr超能文献

共聚焦激光内镜在体内检测胃肠化生的随机对照试验。

Confocal laser endomicroscopy for in vivo detection of gastric intestinal metaplasia: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Department of Pathology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2014 Apr;46(4):282-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1359215. Epub 2014 Jan 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is associated with a risk for development of intestinal-type gastric cancer. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic yield of GIM from confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) and white light endoscopy (WLE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective, double-blind, randomized study, patients were randomly assigned to receive either CLE with targeted biopsies (group A) or WLE with a standard biopsy protocol (group B).

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were finally analyzed (group A 85, group B 83). On a per-patient analysis, the diagnostic yields of GIM (including GIM with gastric intraepithelial neoplasia [GIN]) for groups A and B were 44.71 % and 31.33 %, respectively (P = 0.074). On a per-biopsy analysis, CLE-targeted biopsy gave a significantly higher diagnostic yield of GIM compared with WLE and standard biopsy, at 65.70 % (113 /172 biopsies) versus 15.73 % (81 /515 biopsies) (P < 0.001). Moreover, the diagnostic yield of the operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia (OLGIM) assessment stages III and IV was higher at 20.93 % (36 /172 biopsies) in group A versus 4.08 % (21 /515 biopsies) in group B (P < 0.001). In addition, use of CLE-guided biopsy significantly decreased by 68 % (P < 0.001) the mean number of biopsies required per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

CLE with targeted biopsies is superior to WLE with standard biopsies for the detection and surveillance of GIM. The number of biopsies needed to confirm GIM is about one third of that needed with WLE with standard biopsies.

摘要

背景和研究目的

胃肠上皮化生(GIM)与发生肠型胃癌的风险相关。本研究旨在比较共聚焦激光内镜(CLE)和白光内镜(WLE)对 GIM 的诊断效果。

患者和方法

在一项前瞻性、双盲、随机研究中,患者被随机分为接受 CLE 靶向活检(A 组)或 WLE 标准活检(B 组)。

结果

最终分析了 168 例患者(A 组 85 例,B 组 83 例)。在患者层面,A、B 两组 GIM(包括胃上皮内瘤变[GIN])的诊断率分别为 44.71%和 31.33%(P=0.074)。在每例活检层面,CLE 靶向活检的 GIM 诊断率明显高于 WLE 和标准活检,分别为 65.70%(172 例活检中的 113 例)和 15.73%(515 例活检中的 81 例)(P<0.001)。此外,在 OLGIM 评估阶段 III 和 IV 的诊断率也更高,A 组为 20.93%(172 例活检中的 36 例),B 组为 4.08%(515 例活检中的 21 例)(P<0.001)。此外,CLE 引导的活检显著减少了 68%(P<0.001)的每位患者所需活检的平均数量。

结论

与 WLE 标准活检相比,CLE 靶向活检在检测和监测 GIM 方面具有优势。确认 GIM 所需的活检数量约为 WLE 标准活检的三分之一。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验