Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Department of Pathology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Endoscopy. 2014 Apr;46(4):282-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1359215. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is associated with a risk for development of intestinal-type gastric cancer. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic yield of GIM from confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) and white light endoscopy (WLE).
In a prospective, double-blind, randomized study, patients were randomly assigned to receive either CLE with targeted biopsies (group A) or WLE with a standard biopsy protocol (group B).
A total of 168 patients were finally analyzed (group A 85, group B 83). On a per-patient analysis, the diagnostic yields of GIM (including GIM with gastric intraepithelial neoplasia [GIN]) for groups A and B were 44.71 % and 31.33 %, respectively (P = 0.074). On a per-biopsy analysis, CLE-targeted biopsy gave a significantly higher diagnostic yield of GIM compared with WLE and standard biopsy, at 65.70 % (113 /172 biopsies) versus 15.73 % (81 /515 biopsies) (P < 0.001). Moreover, the diagnostic yield of the operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia (OLGIM) assessment stages III and IV was higher at 20.93 % (36 /172 biopsies) in group A versus 4.08 % (21 /515 biopsies) in group B (P < 0.001). In addition, use of CLE-guided biopsy significantly decreased by 68 % (P < 0.001) the mean number of biopsies required per patient.
CLE with targeted biopsies is superior to WLE with standard biopsies for the detection and surveillance of GIM. The number of biopsies needed to confirm GIM is about one third of that needed with WLE with standard biopsies.
胃肠上皮化生(GIM)与发生肠型胃癌的风险相关。本研究旨在比较共聚焦激光内镜(CLE)和白光内镜(WLE)对 GIM 的诊断效果。
在一项前瞻性、双盲、随机研究中,患者被随机分为接受 CLE 靶向活检(A 组)或 WLE 标准活检(B 组)。
最终分析了 168 例患者(A 组 85 例,B 组 83 例)。在患者层面,A、B 两组 GIM(包括胃上皮内瘤变[GIN])的诊断率分别为 44.71%和 31.33%(P=0.074)。在每例活检层面,CLE 靶向活检的 GIM 诊断率明显高于 WLE 和标准活检,分别为 65.70%(172 例活检中的 113 例)和 15.73%(515 例活检中的 81 例)(P<0.001)。此外,在 OLGIM 评估阶段 III 和 IV 的诊断率也更高,A 组为 20.93%(172 例活检中的 36 例),B 组为 4.08%(515 例活检中的 21 例)(P<0.001)。此外,CLE 引导的活检显著减少了 68%(P<0.001)的每位患者所需活检的平均数量。
与 WLE 标准活检相比,CLE 靶向活检在检测和监测 GIM 方面具有优势。确认 GIM 所需的活检数量约为 WLE 标准活检的三分之一。