Observational studies: why are they so important?
作者信息
Mariani Alessandro Wasum, Pêgo-Fernandes Paulo Manuel
机构信息
Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, MD, PhD. Associate Professor, Discipline of Thoracic Surgery, Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas (HC), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
出版信息
Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132(1):1-2. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.1321784.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Observational studies: why are they so important?观察性研究：为何它们如此重要？
Sao Paulo Med J. 2014;132(1):1-2. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.1321784.
2
Randomized trials analyzed as observational studies.作为观察性研究进行分析的随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Oct 15;159(8):560-2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-8-201310150-00709.
3
Choosing wisely between randomized controlled trials and observational designs in studies about interventions.在有关干预措施的研究中，在随机对照试验和观察性设计之间做出明智选择。
J Bras Pneumol. 2016 May-Jun;42(3):165. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37562016000000152.
4
Challenges of Assessing Therapeutic or Diagnostic Outcomes with Observational Data.利用观察性数据评估治疗或诊断结果的挑战。
Am J Med. 2018 Feb;131(2):206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.10.027. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
5
Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Real-World Data in the COVID-19 Era: A False Narrative.新冠疫情时代的随机对照试验与真实世界数据：一种错误的说法。
Cancer Invest. 2020 Nov;38(10):537-542. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2020.1841922. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
6
Is there a difference between applicability and generalisability?适用性和普遍性之间有区别吗？
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Mar;119:A5-A7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.012.
7
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Recenti Prog Med. 2019 Nov;110(11):531. doi: 10.1701/3265.32352.
8
Randomized trials, observational studies, and the illusive search for the source of truth.随机试验、观察性研究以及对真相来源的虚幻探寻。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Feb;163(2):757-762. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.10.120. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
9
Study Design in Neurosurgical Research: Considerations for Observational and Experimental Cohort Studies.神经外科研究中的研究设计：观察性和实验性队列研究的考虑因素。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(1):14-18. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz386.
10
Why do we continue to adopt medical practices based on pathophysiology alone when we should be insisting on clinical trials?当我们应该坚持进行临床试验时，为什么我们仍继续采用仅基于病理生理学的医学实践呢？
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):361-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.009.
引用本文的文献
1
Use of mHealth in promoting maternal and child health in "BIMARU" states of India "A health system strengthening strategy": Systematic literature review.印度“BIMARU”邦利用移动医疗促进母婴健康：一项卫生系统强化策略的系统文献综述
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Feb 2;3(2):e0000403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000403. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Effects of supplementation with milk protein on glycemic parameters: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.补充牛奶蛋白对血糖参数的影响：一项 GRADE 评估的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Nutr J. 2023 Oct 6;22(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12937-023-00878-1.
3
A Methodological Review of Drug-Related Toxicological Studies in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯药物相关毒理学研究的方法学综述
Cureus. 2023 Mar 19;15(3):e36369. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36369. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Recreational fishing, health and well-being: findings from a cross-sectional survey.休闲垂钓、健康与幸福：一项横断面调查的结果
Ecosyst People (Abingdon). 2022;18(1):530-546. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2022.2112291. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
5
Safety and effectiveness of cannabinoids to Danish patients with treatment refractory chronic pain-A retrospective observational real-world study.大麻素治疗丹麦难治性慢性疼痛患者的安全性和有效性：一项回顾性观察性真实世界研究。
Eur J Pain. 2023 Feb;27(2):234-247. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2054. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
6
Estimating the Individual Treatment Effect on Survival Time Based on Prior Knowledge and Counterfactual Prediction.基于先验知识和反事实预测估计个体治疗对生存时间的影响。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jul 14;24(7):975. doi: 10.3390/e24070975.
7
Epidemiology of floods in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of health outcomes.撒哈拉以南非洲洪水的流行病学：对健康结果的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;22(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12584-4.
8
Identifying the DEAD: Development and Validation of a Patient-Level Model to Predict Death Status in Population-Level Claims Data.识别死亡患者：基于人群水平理赔数据建立预测患者死亡状态的个体水平预测模型的开发和验证。
Drug Saf. 2019 Nov;42(11):1377-1386. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00827-0.
9
How Does Diet Change with A Diagnosis of Diabetes? Protocol of the 3D Longitudinal Study.饮食如何随着糖尿病诊断而改变？3D 纵向研究方案。
Nutrients. 2019 Jan 12;11(1):158. doi: 10.3390/nu11010158.
10
Effectiveness and tolerability of direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C patients in a Southern state of Brazil.巴西南部一州慢性丙型肝炎患者直接作用抗病毒药物的疗效和耐受性。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2018 May-Jun;22(3):186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 May 9.
本文引用的文献
1
Observational studies: going beyond the boundaries of randomized controlled trials.观察性研究：超越随机对照试验的界限。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 May;88 Suppl 1:S3-9. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8227(10)70002-4.
2
Randomized clinical trials and observational studies: guidelines for assessing respective strengths and limitations.随机临床试验与观察性研究：评估各自优势与局限性的指南
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jun;1(3):211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.01.008.
3
Confounding and confounders.混杂与混杂因素。
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Mar;60(3):227-34; quiz 164, 234. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.3.227.
4
Observational research methods. Research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies.观察性研究方法。研究设计II：队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究。
Emerg Med J. 2003 Jan;20(1):54-60. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.1.54.
5
Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.随机对照试验、观察性研究以及研究设计的层次结构。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1887-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006223422507.
6
Invited commentary: propensity scores.特邀评论：倾向评分
Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Aug 15;150(4):327-33. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010011.
Zotero 插件