van den Bekerom Michel P J, Sjer Arnout, Somford Matthijs P, Bulstra Gythe H, Struijs Peter A A, Kerkhoffs Gino M M J
OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
MCA, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Aug;23(8):2390-2399. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2851-6. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
In the recent clinical guideline for acute lateral ankle sprain, the current best evidence for diagnosis, treatment and prevention strategies was evaluated. Key findings for treatment included the use of ice and compression in the initial phase of treatment, in combination with rest and elevation. A short period of taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may facilitate a rapid decrease in pain and swelling can also be helpful in the acute phase. The objective was to assess the effectiveness and safety of oral and topical NSAID in the treatment for acute ankle sprains.
Randomised controlled trials comparing oral or topic NSAID treatment with placebo or each other were included. Primary outcome measures were pain at rest or at mobilisation and adverse events. Trials were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Twenty-eight studies were included, and 22 were available for meta-analysis. Superior results were reported for oral NSAIDs when compared with placebo, concerning pain on weight bearing on short term, pain at rest on the short term, and less swelling on short- and intermediate term. For topical NSAIDs, superior results compared with placebo were found for pain at rest (short term), persistent pain (intermediate term), pain on weight bearing (short- and intermediate term) and for swelling (short and intermediate term). No trials were included comparing oral with topic NSAIDs, so conclusions regarding this comparison are not realistic.
The current evidence is limited due to the low number of studies, lack of methodological quality of the included studies as well as the small sample size of the included studies. Nevertheless, the findings from this review support the use of NSAIDs for the initial treatment for acute ankle sprains.
Meta-analysis of RCTs, Level I.
在近期的急性外侧踝关节扭伤临床指南中,对诊断、治疗和预防策略的当前最佳证据进行了评估。治疗的主要发现包括在治疗初期使用冰敷和加压,同时结合休息和抬高患肢。短期内服用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)可能有助于迅速减轻疼痛,肿胀在急性期也可能有帮助。目的是评估口服和外用NSAIDs治疗急性踝关节扭伤的有效性和安全性。
纳入比较口服或外用NSAIDs治疗与安慰剂或两者相互比较的随机对照试验。主要结局指标为静息或活动时的疼痛及不良事件。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具对试验进行评估。
纳入28项研究,其中22项可用于荟萃分析。与安慰剂相比,口服NSAIDs在短期负重疼痛、短期静息疼痛以及短期和中期肿胀减轻方面报告了更好的结果。对于外用NSAIDs,与安慰剂相比,在静息疼痛(短期)、持续性疼痛(中期)、负重疼痛(短期和中期)以及肿胀(短期和中期)方面发现了更好的结果。未纳入比较口服与外用NSAIDs的试验,因此关于这种比较的结论不切实际。
由于研究数量少、纳入研究的方法学质量差以及纳入研究的样本量小,目前的证据有限。然而,本综述的结果支持使用NSAIDs进行急性踝关节扭伤的初始治疗。
RCT的荟萃分析,I级。