Predel Hans-Georg, Leary Andrew, Imboden Roger, Bulitta Michael, Giannetti Bruno
Institute of Circulatory Research and Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Dr. Regenold, Badenweiler, Germany.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Aug 12;9(8):23259671211032591. doi: 10.1177/23259671211032591. eCollection 2021 Aug.
The favorable benefit-risk profile of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) makes them a preferred treatment for pain relief in soft tissue injuries.
To assess the efficacy and safety of a novel etofenamate 70-mg medicated plaster in patients with acute uncomplicated ankle sprain.
Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Patients with grade 1 or 2 ankle sprain of recent onset were randomized to etofenamate or placebo plasters (1:1) applied twice daily for 7 days. Clinical assessments, including ankle pain on movement (POM) in mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), were made at predefined intervals during the treatment period.
In total, 156 male or female adult patients (mean age, 35.3 ± 11.8 years) were enrolled. The fall in VAS values for POM from baseline to 72 hours was markedly in favor of the etofenamate plaster, with respective reductions of 52.7% and 24.0% for active and placebo plasters (least squares mean treatment difference, 22.1 mm; value for analysis of covariance < .0001). Similar clinically relevant differences between etofenamate and placebo were seen for POM at the 48-, 96-, and 168-hour visits ( < .0001). These differences between etofenamate and placebo plasters were reflected in area under the curve for POM, pain at rest, and ankle swelling measured at various time points during the 7 days. Time taken to achieve a meaningful (30%) and optimal (50%) reduction of POM was significantly shorter in the etofenamate group. The responder rate (proportion of patients with at least 50% pain reduction at 72 hours) was 52.5% for the etofenamate plaster and 7.7% for the placebo. A significantly greater proportion of patients randomized to etofenamate rated their progress and/or the treatment as "good" or "very good." The medicated plasters adhered well over the 12-hour dosing period and were very well-tolerated.
With respect to the investigated indication, uncomplicated ankle sprain, the etofenamate plaster has therapeutic efficacy that is similar to that for the best available topical NSAID formulations.
2016-000252-99 (EudraCT number).
局部用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)良好的效益风险比使其成为软组织损伤疼痛缓解的首选治疗方法。
评估一种新型70毫克依托芬那酯药用贴剂治疗急性单纯性踝关节扭伤患者的疗效和安全性。
随机对照试验;证据等级为1级。
近期发生1级或2级踝关节扭伤的患者被随机分为依托芬那酯贴剂组或安慰剂贴剂组(1:1),每天使用两次,共7天。在治疗期间的预定时间点进行临床评估,包括使用100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)以毫米为单位测量的活动时踝关节疼痛(POM)。
总共纳入了156例成年男性或女性患者(平均年龄35.3±11.8岁)。从基线到72小时,依托芬那酯贴剂组的POM的VAS值下降明显优于安慰剂贴剂组,活性贴剂和安慰剂贴剂的VAS值分别降低了52.7%和24.0%(最小二乘均值治疗差异为22.1毫米;协方差分析P值<0.0001)。在48小时、96小时和168小时的随访中,依托芬那酯组和安慰剂组在POM方面也观察到了类似的具有临床意义的差异(P<0.0001)。依托芬那酯贴剂和安慰剂贴剂之间的这些差异反映在7天内不同时间点测量的POM、静息痛和踝关节肿胀的曲线下面积上。依托芬那酯组实现POM有意义(30%)和最佳(50%)降低所需的时间明显更短。依托芬那酯贴剂的缓解率(72小时时疼痛至少减轻50%的患者比例)为52.5%,安慰剂组为7.7%。随机接受依托芬那酯治疗的患者中,将其进展和/或治疗评为“良好”或“非常好”的比例明显更高。药用贴剂在12小时给药期间粘附良好,耐受性非常好。
对于所研究的适应证,即单纯性踝关节扭伤,依托芬那酯贴剂具有与现有最佳局部NSAIDs制剂相似的治疗效果。
2016 - 000252 - 99(欧盟临床试验注册号)