Newberg Andrew B, Serruya Mijail, Gepty Andrew, Intenzo Charles, Lewis Todd, Amen Daniel, Russell David S, Wintering Nancy
Myrna Brind Center of Integrative Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 24;9(1):e87009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087009. eCollection 2014.
This study evaluated the clinical interpretations of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using a cerebral blood flow and a dopamine transporter tracer in patients with chronic mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). The goal was to determine how these two different scan might be used and compared to each other in this patient population.
Twenty-five patients with persistent symptoms after a mild TBI underwent SPECT with both (99m)Tc exametazime to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF) and (123)I ioflupane to measure dopamine transporter (DAT) binding. The scans were interpreted by two expert readers blinded to any case information and were assessed for abnormal findings in comparison to 10 controls for each type of scan. Qualitative CBF scores for each cortical and subcortical region along with DAT binding scores for the striatum were compared to each other across subjects and to controls. In addition, symptoms were compared to brain scan findings. TBI patients had an average of 6 brain regions with abnormal perfusion compared to controls who had an average of 2 abnormal regions (p<0.001). Patient with headaches had lower CBF in the right frontal lobe, and higher CBF in the left parietal lobe compared to patients without headaches. Lower CBF in the right temporal lobe correlated with poorer reported physical health. Higher DAT binding was associated with more depressive symptoms and overall poorer reported mental health. There was no clear association between CBF and DAT binding in these patients.
Overall, both scans detected abnormalities in brain function, but appear to reflect different types of physiological processes associated with chronic mild TBI symptoms. Both types of scans might have distinct uses in the evaluation of chronic TBI patients depending on the clinical scenario.
本研究评估了使用脑血流和多巴胺转运体示踪剂的单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)在慢性轻度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者中的临床解读。目的是确定这两种不同的扫描方法在该患者群体中如何使用以及相互比较。
25例轻度TBI后仍有持续症状的患者接受了SPECT检查,分别使用(99m)锝依沙美肟测量脑血流(CBF)和(123)碘氟潘测量多巴胺转运体(DAT)结合。扫描结果由两位对任何病例信息均不知情的专家读者进行解读,并与每种扫描类型的10名对照者进行比较,以评估异常发现。对每个皮质和皮质下区域的定性CBF评分以及纹状体的DAT结合评分在受试者之间以及与对照者进行比较。此外,将症状与脑部扫描结果进行比较。与平均有2个异常区域的对照者相比,TBI患者平均有6个脑区灌注异常(p<0.001)。与无头痛的患者相比,有头痛的患者右额叶CBF较低,左顶叶CBF较高。右颞叶CBF较低与报告的身体健康较差相关。较高的DAT结合与更多的抑郁症状和总体较差的心理健康报告相关。在这些患者中,CBF与DAT结合之间没有明显关联。
总体而言,两种扫描均检测到脑功能异常,但似乎反映了与慢性轻度TBI症状相关的不同类型的生理过程。根据临床情况,这两种扫描在慢性TBI患者的评估中可能有不同的用途。