Roshan N M, Sakeenabi B
Department of Pedodontics, College of Dental sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India.
Department of Community Dentistry, College of Dental sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2011 Jan;1(1):1-8. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.86373.
Sugar (sucrose) being most acceptable sweetening agent in use by mankind is considered as the "Arch Criminal" in dental caries initiation. Search for suitable sweetening agent which will satisfy all the characteristics of sugar along with being non-cariogenic is going on since decades. At this given point of time, there is no such substitute which will replace sugar in all aspects, but, cariogenic potential can certainly be reduced by using sugar substitutes. Recently, few sugar substitutes are even considered to have antimicrobial property against caries producing microbes in oral cavity. Although sweetening agents and sugar substitutes are available in market in various forms, how acceptable are they?, what are the public perceptions regarding their use?, and their use in caries prevention are few areas still very much unclear.
糖(蔗糖)作为人类使用的最易接受的甜味剂,被认为是引发龋齿的“罪魁祸首”。几十年来,人们一直在寻找一种合适的甜味剂,它既能满足糖的所有特性,又不会引发龋齿。在当前这个时间点,没有一种替代品能在所有方面取代糖,但是,使用代糖肯定可以降低致龋潜力。最近,甚至有几种代糖被认为对口腔中产生龋齿的微生物具有抗菌特性。尽管甜味剂和代糖在市场上有各种形式,但它们的可接受程度如何?公众对其使用有何看法?以及它们在预防龋齿方面的应用,这些领域仍有很多不清楚的地方。