Van Parys An-Sofie, Verhamme Annelien, Temmerman Marleen, Verstraelen Hans
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology/International Centre for Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 17;9(1):e85084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085084. eCollection 2014.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) around the time of pregnancy is a widespread global health problem with many negative consequences. Nevertheless, a lot remains unclear about which interventions are effective and might be adopted in the perinatal care context.
The objective is to provide a clear overview of the existing evidence on effectiveness of interventions for IPV around the time of pregnancy.
Following databases PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched and expanded by hand search. The search was limited to English peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials published from 2000 to 2013. This review includes all types of interventions aiming to reduce IPV around the time of pregnancy as a primary outcome, and as secondary outcomes to enhance physical and/or mental health, quality of life, safety behavior, help seeking behavior, and/or social support.
We found few randomized controlled trials evaluating interventions for IPV around the time of pregnancy. Moreover, the nine studies identified did not produce strong evidence that certain interventions are effective. Nonetheless, home visitation programs and some multifaceted counseling interventions did produce promising results. Five studies reported a statistically significant decrease in physical, sexual and/or psychological partner violence (odds ratios from 0.47 to 0.92). Limited evidence was found for improved mental health, less postnatal depression, improved quality of life, fewer subsequent miscarriages, and less low birth weight/prematurity. None of the studies reported any evidence of a negative or harmful effect of the interventions.
Strong evidence of effective interventions for IPV during the perinatal period is lacking, but some interventions show promising results. Additional large-scale, high-quality research is essential to provide further evidence about the effect of certain interventions and clarify which interventions should be adopted in the perinatal care context.
孕期亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个全球性的普遍健康问题,会带来诸多负面后果。然而,关于哪些干预措施有效以及可在围产期护理环境中采用,仍有许多不明确之处。
旨在清晰概述孕期IPV干预措施有效性的现有证据。
对PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆等数据库进行系统检索,并通过手工检索进行扩展。检索限于2000年至2013年发表的英文同行评审随机对照试验。本综述包括所有旨在将孕期IPV作为主要结局进行减少的干预措施类型,以及作为次要结局以改善身心健康、生活质量、安全行为、求助行为和/或社会支持的干预措施类型。
我们发现很少有随机对照试验评估孕期IPV的干预措施。此外,所确定的9项研究并未产生有力证据表明某些干预措施是有效的。尽管如此,家访计划和一些多方面的咨询干预措施确实产生了有希望的结果。5项研究报告称身体、性和/或心理伴侣暴力在统计学上显著减少(优势比从0.47至0.92)。在改善心理健康、减少产后抑郁、提高生活质量、减少后续流产以及降低低出生体重/早产方面发现的证据有限。没有一项研究报告干预措施有任何负面或有害影响的证据。
围产期IPV有效干预措施的有力证据不足,但一些干预措施显示出有希望的结果。额外的大规模、高质量研究对于提供关于某些干预措施效果的进一步证据以及明确围产期护理环境中应采用哪些干预措施至关重要。