Cunningham Centre for Palliative Care, Calvary Health Care Sydney, Korgarah, New South Wales, Australia.
WA Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Death Stud. 2010 Sep;34(8):673-98. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2010.496686.
A systematic review of the literature on predictors of complicated grief (CG) was undertaken with the aim of clarifying the current knowledge and to inform future planning and work in CG following bereavement. Predictors of CG prior to the death include previous loss, exposure to trauma, a previous psychiatric history, attachment style, and the relationship to the deceased. Factors associated with the death include violent death, the quality of the caregiving or dying experience, close kinship relationship to the deceased, marital closeness and dependency, and lack of preparation for the death. Perceived social support played a key role after death, along with cognitive appraisals and high distress at the time of the death. Inconsistent definitions of CG and measurement tools were noted in the earlier studies reviewed. Limitations identified in the studies included use of cross-sectional designs, heterogeneous samples, high attrition, demographic differences between cases and controls, differences in length of time since death, and differences in types of death experienced. Notwithstanding these limitations, some consistent findings have emerged. Further research into conceptualizations of CG in terms of attachment theory and constructivist and cognitive-behavioral concepts of finding purpose and meaning after bereavement is warranted.
对复杂悲伤(CG)预测因素的文献进行了系统回顾,旨在澄清当前的知识,并为丧亲后 CG 的未来规划和工作提供信息。CG 的预测因素包括先前的损失、创伤暴露、先前的精神病史、依恋风格和与死者的关系。与死亡相关的因素包括暴力死亡、护理或临终体验的质量、与死者的近亲关系、婚姻亲密和依赖,以及对死亡缺乏准备。在死亡后,感知到的社会支持、认知评估和死亡时的高度痛苦发挥了关键作用。在回顾的早期研究中,注意到 CG 的定义和测量工具不一致。研究中的局限性包括使用横断面设计、样本异质性、高流失率、病例和对照组之间的人口统计学差异、死亡后时间长短的差异,以及经历的死亡类型的差异。尽管存在这些局限性,但已经出现了一些一致的发现。有必要进一步研究依恋理论以及丧亲后寻找目的和意义的建构主义和认知行为概念在 CG 概念化方面的研究。