Brito Maja Furlan de, Selman Lucy E, Calanzani Natalia, Koffman Jonathan, Higginson Irene J, Gomes Barbara
Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, Coimbra, 3000-548, Portugal.
Centre for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CIBB), University of Coimbra, Rua Larga, Coimbra, 3004-504, Portugal.
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 2;24(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01705-6.
The levels of support needs among people bereaved due to cancer are high; however, bereavement support services are underutilised. Reasons are unknown. We aimed to examine the relationship of caregiving burden and involvement of palliative care with the utilisation of formal bereavement support by family carers of people who died of cancer.
Secondary analysis of population-based mortality follow-back study (QUALYCARE) with bereaved relatives of adults who registered the death of an adult due to cancer and involved in caregiving. We ran a multivariate logistic regression to determine whether caregiving burden and palliative care involvement explain the utilisation of bereavement support.
Out of 523 family members involved in caregiving (66% women, M=59 (SD = 14), 43% spouses/partners, 41% adult children), 149 (28.8%) utilised formal bereavement support (73.8% women, M=60 (SD = 14), 55% spouse/partner, 36% adult children). We found higher grief intensity (measured by the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief) than the reported population norms. Bivariate analysis confirmed the hypothesised associations. However, these were not retained in the multivariate model. Utilisation of bereavement support was associated with presence at the moment of death (OR 1.769, 95%CI = 1.044-2.994) and grief intensity (1.036, 95%CI = 1.015-1.058).
Subjective experiences such as grief intensity and being present at the moment of death are associated with the need for formal bereavement support, raising the issue of continuity of care for family carers into bereavement. Further research is warranted to better understand the complex relationships between caregiving, bereavement, and the role of palliative care in facilitating access to bereavement support.
因癌症失去亲人的人群对支持的需求程度很高;然而,丧亲支持服务的利用率却很低。原因尚不清楚。我们旨在研究护理负担和姑息治疗的参与情况与癌症死亡者的家庭护理人员对正式丧亲支持服务的利用率之间的关系。
对基于人群的死亡率随访研究(QUALYCARE)进行二次分析,研究对象为登记了成年人因癌症死亡且参与护理的丧亲亲属。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定护理负担和姑息治疗的参与情况是否能解释丧亲支持服务的利用率。
在523名参与护理的家庭成员中(66%为女性,平均年龄59岁(标准差=14),43%为配偶/伴侣,41%为成年子女),149人(28.8%)使用了正式的丧亲支持服务(73.8%为女性,平均年龄60岁(标准差=14),55%为配偶/伴侣,36%为成年子女)。我们发现,与报告的总体标准相比,悲伤强度(通过德克萨斯修订悲伤量表测量)更高。双变量分析证实了假设的关联。然而,这些关联在多变量模型中并未保留。丧亲支持服务的利用率与在死亡时刻在场(比值比1.769,95%置信区间=1.044-2.994)和悲伤强度(1.036,95%置信区间=1.015-1.058)有关。
悲伤强度和在死亡时刻在场等主观体验与对正式丧亲支持的需求有关,这就提出了家庭护理人员在丧亲期间护理连续性的问题。有必要进行进一步研究,以更好地理解护理、丧亲以及姑息治疗在促进获得丧亲支持方面的作用之间的复杂关系。