• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绿色建筑规范和认证系统的环境绩效。

Environmental performance of green building code and certification systems.

机构信息

Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California , Santa Barbara, California 93106-5131, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(5):2551-60. doi: 10.1021/es4040792. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1021/es4040792
PMID:24483287
Abstract

We examined the potential life-cycle environmental impact reduction of three green building code and certification (GBCC) systems: LEED, ASHRAE 189.1, and IgCC. A recently completed whole-building life cycle assessment (LCA) database of NIST was applied to a prototype building model specification by NREL. TRACI 2.0 of EPA was used for life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). The results showed that the baseline building model generates about 18 thousand metric tons CO2-equiv. of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and consumes 6 terajoule (TJ) of primary energy and 328 million liter of water over its life-cycle. Overall, GBCC-compliant building models generated 0% to 25% less environmental impacts than the baseline case (average 14% reduction). The largest reductions were associated with acidification (25%), human health-respiratory (24%), and global warming (GW) (22%), while no reductions were observed for ozone layer depletion (OD) and land use (LU). The performances of the three GBCC-compliant building models measured in life-cycle impact reduction were comparable. A sensitivity analysis showed that the comparative results were reasonably robust, although some results were relatively sensitive to the behavioral parameters, including employee transportation and purchased electricity during the occupancy phase (average sensitivity coefficients 0.26-0.29).

摘要

我们研究了三种绿色建筑规范和认证(GBCC)系统——LEED、ASHRAE 189.1 和 IgCC——的潜在生命周期环境影响减少情况。我们应用 NIST 最近完成的全建筑生命周期评估(LCA)数据库,对 NREL 提出的原型建筑模型规范进行了分析。美国环保署的 TRACI 2.0 被用于生命周期影响评估(LCIA)。结果表明,基准建筑模型在其生命周期内产生约 18000 公吨二氧化碳当量温室气体(GHG),消耗 6 太焦耳(TJ)一次能源和 3.28 亿升水。总体而言,符合 GBCC 规范的建筑模型产生的环境影响比基准案例减少 0%至 25%(平均减少 14%)。最大的减排量与酸化(25%)、人类健康-呼吸道(24%)和全球变暖(GW)(22%)有关,而臭氧层消耗(OD)和土地利用(LU)没有减少。三种符合 GBCC 规范的建筑模型在生命周期影响减少方面的性能相当。敏感性分析表明,尽管一些结果对员工交通和占用阶段购买电力等行为参数相对敏感(平均敏感性系数为 0.26-0.29),但比较结果具有相当的稳健性。

相似文献

1
Environmental performance of green building code and certification systems.绿色建筑规范和认证系统的环境绩效。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(5):2551-60. doi: 10.1021/es4040792. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
2
Life-cycle thinking and the LEED rating system: global perspective on building energy use and environmental impacts.生命周期思维与 LEED 评级系统:全球视角下的建筑能源利用与环境影响
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 7;49(7):4048-56. doi: 10.1021/es505938u. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
3
Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications.生命周期评估 第1部分:框架、目标与范围界定、清单分析及应用
Environ Int. 2004 Jul;30(5):701-20. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005.
4
Multidisciplinary life cycle metrics and tools for green buildings.绿色建筑的多学科生命周期指标和工具。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2009 Jul;5(3):390-8. doi: 10.1897/ieam_2008-069.1.
5
An attributional life cycle assessment for an Italian residential multifamily building.意大利住宅多户建筑的归因生命周期评估。
Environ Technol. 2018 Dec;39(23):3033-3045. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1371252. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
6
Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Construction within the Industrialized Building Process: A Monetization and Building Information Modelling Approach.评估工业化建筑过程中的建筑环境影响:货币化和建筑信息建模方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 13;17(22):8396. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228396.
7
Environmental decision-making using life cycle impact assessment and stochastic multiattribute decision analysis: a case study on alternative transportation fuels.运用生命周期影响评估和随机多属性决策分析进行环境决策:以替代运输燃料为例
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Mar 15;43(6):1718-23. doi: 10.1021/es801123h.
8
Proposal of Environmental Impact Assessment Method for Concrete in South Korea: An Application in LCA (Life Cycle Assessment).韩国混凝土环境影响评估方法的建议:在生命周期评估(LCA)中的应用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Nov 2;13(11):1074. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13111074.
9
[Comparative life cycle environmental assessment between electric taxi and gasoline taxi in Beijing].[北京电动出租车与汽油出租车的生命周期环境影响比较评估]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2015 Mar;36(3):1105-16.
10
Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice.生命周期评估 第2部分:当前的影响评估实践
Environ Int. 2004 Jul;30(5):721-39. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Template for Evaluating Cradle-to-Site Environmental Life Cycle Impacts of Buildings in India.印度建筑物从摇篮到场地的环境生命周期影响评估模板。
ACS Environ Au. 2022 Nov 29;3(2):94-104. doi: 10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00035. eCollection 2023 Mar 15.
2
From occupants to occupants: A review of the occupant information understanding for building HVAC occupant-centric control.从居住者到居住者:关于建筑暖通空调以居住者为中心控制的居住者信息理解综述。
Build Simul. 2022;15(6):913-932. doi: 10.1007/s12273-021-0861-0. Epub 2021 Dec 7.