Kaufman Howard L, Kim Dae Won, Kim-Schulze Seunghee, DeRaffele Gail, Jagoda Michael C, Broucek Joseph R, Zloza Andrew
1 Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University , New Brunswick, NJ 08903.
Hum Gene Ther. 2014 May;25(5):452-60. doi: 10.1089/hum.2013.217. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
Oncolytic viruses have shown promise as gene delivery vehicles in the treatment of cancer; however, their efficacy may be inhibited by the induction of anti-viral antibody titers. Fowlpox virus is a nonreplicating and nononcolytic vector that has been associated with lesser humoral but greater cell-mediated immunity in animal tumor models. To test whether fowlpox virus gene therapy is safe and can elicit immune responses in patients with cancer, we conducted a randomized phase I clinical trial of two recombinant fowlpox viruses encoding human B7.1 or a triad of costimulatory molecules (B7.1, ICAM-1, and LFA-3; TRICOM). Twelve patients (10 with melanoma and 2 with colon adenocarcinoma) enrolled in the trial and were randomized to rF-B7.1 or rF-TRICOM administered in a dose escalation manner (~3.7×10(7) or ~3.7×10(8) plaque-forming units) by intralesional injection every 4 weeks. The therapy was well tolerated, with only four patients experiencing grade 1 fever or injection site pain, and there were no serious adverse events. All patients developed anti-viral antibody titers after vector delivery, and posttreatment anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody titers were detected in the two patients with colon cancer. All patients developed CD8(+) T cell responses against fowlpox virus, but few responses against defined tumor-associated antigens were observed. This is the first clinical trial of direct (intratumoral) gene therapy with a nononcolytic fowlpox virus. Treatment was well tolerated in patients with metastatic cancer; all subjects exhibited anti-viral antibody responses, but limited tumor-specific T cell responses were detected. Nononcolytic fowlpox viruses are safe and induce limited T cell responses in patients with cancer. Further development may include prime-boost strategies using oncolytic viruses for initial priming.
溶瘤病毒作为癌症治疗中的基因传递载体已展现出前景;然而,抗病毒抗体滴度的诱导可能会抑制其疗效。禽痘病毒是一种非复制性且非溶瘤性的载体,在动物肿瘤模型中,它与较弱的体液免疫但较强的细胞介导免疫相关。为了测试禽痘病毒基因疗法在癌症患者中是否安全以及能否引发免疫反应,我们进行了一项随机I期临床试验,使用两种编码人B7.1或三联共刺激分子(B7.1、细胞间黏附分子-1和淋巴细胞功能相关抗原-3;TRICOM)的重组禽痘病毒。12名患者(10名黑色素瘤患者和2名结肠腺癌患者)参与了该试验,并被随机分配接受以剂量递增方式(约3.7×10⁷或约3.7×10⁸蚀斑形成单位)每4周瘤内注射一次的重组禽痘病毒B7.1(rF-B7.1)或重组禽痘病毒TRICOM(rF-TRICOM)。该疗法耐受性良好,只有4名患者出现1级发热或注射部位疼痛,且无严重不良事件。所有患者在载体递送后均产生了抗病毒抗体滴度,两名结肠癌患者在治疗后检测到抗癌胚抗原抗体滴度。所有患者均产生了针对禽痘病毒的CD8⁺T细胞反应,但针对特定肿瘤相关抗原的反应很少。这是首次使用非溶瘤性禽痘病毒进行直接(瘤内)基因治疗的临床试验。转移性癌症患者对治疗耐受性良好;所有受试者均表现出抗病毒抗体反应,但检测到的肿瘤特异性T细胞反应有限。非溶瘤性禽痘病毒在癌症患者中是安全的,并诱导有限的T细胞反应。进一步的研发可能包括使用溶瘤病毒进行初始激发的激发-增强策略。