Boerkamp Kim M, Teske Erik, Boon Lonneke R, Grinwis Guy C M, van den Bossche Lindsay, Rutteman Gerard R
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Companion Animals, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 108, Utrecht 3584 CM, The Netherlands.
BMC Vet Res. 2014 Jan 31;10:34. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-34.
A genetic predisposition for certain tumour types has been proven for some dog breeds. Some studies have suggested that this may also be true for the Golden retriever breed. The present study aimed to examine a possible existence of a tumour (type) predisposition in the Dutch population of Golden retrievers by evaluating annual estimated incidence rates compared to incidence rates from previous publications. A second aim was to evaluate whether incidences of various tumours differed as related to the diagnostic method chosen, being either cytology or histology.
Tumours submitted to Utrecht University during the period 1998-2004 diagnosed either by means of cytology (n = 2,529) or histology (n = 2,124), were related to an average annual Dutch kennel club population of 29,304 Golden retrievers.Combining individual tumours from both the cytological and the histopathological data-set resulted in an annual estimated incidence rate of 2,242 for 100,000 dog-years at risk regarding tumour development in general.The most common cytological tumor diagnoses were 'fat, possibly lipoma' (35%), mast cell tumour (21%) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (10%). The most commonly diagnosed tumours by histology were mast cell tumour (26%), soft tissue sarcomas (11%) and melanoma (8%). Both the cytological and histopathological data-sets, showed variation; in patient age distribution, age of onset and incidence of various tumours.
Comparing our data with previous reports in non-breed-specified dog populations, the Golden retriever breed shows an increased risk for the development of tumours in general, as well as an increased risk for the development of specific tumour types, including the group of soft tissue sarcomas. Variations in age, location and incidence of various tumours were observed between the two data-sets, indicating a selection bias for diagnostic procedure.
某些犬种已被证实存在特定肿瘤类型的遗传易感性。一些研究表明,金毛寻回犬品种可能也是如此。本研究旨在通过评估年度估计发病率并与先前出版物中的发病率进行比较,来研究荷兰金毛寻回犬群体中是否存在肿瘤(类型)易感性。第二个目的是评估不同肿瘤的发病率是否因所选诊断方法(细胞学或组织学)的不同而有所差异。
1998年至2004年期间提交给乌得勒支大学的肿瘤,通过细胞学(n = 2529)或组织学(n = 2124)进行诊断,与荷兰养犬俱乐部平均每年29304只金毛寻回犬的种群数量相关。将细胞学和组织病理学数据集中的个体肿瘤合并后,总体上每100,000犬年发生肿瘤的年度估计发病率为2242。最常见的细胞学肿瘤诊断为“脂肪,可能为脂肪瘤”(35%)、肥大细胞瘤(21%)和非霍奇金淋巴瘤(10%)。组织学诊断最常见的肿瘤是肥大细胞瘤(26%)、软组织肉瘤(11%)和黑色素瘤(8%)。细胞学和组织病理学数据集在患者年龄分布、发病年龄和各种肿瘤的发病率方面均显示出差异。
将我们的数据与之前非特定犬种群体的报告进行比较,金毛寻回犬品种总体上发生肿瘤的风险增加,以及特定肿瘤类型(包括软组织肉瘤组)的发生风险增加。在两个数据集中观察到了不同肿瘤在年龄、位置和发病率方面存在差异,这表明诊断程序存在选择偏倚。