• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于医学生患者安全与质量改进知识的横断面研究。

A cross-sectional study of medical students' knowledge of patient safety and quality improvement.

作者信息

Blasiak Rachel C, Stokes Claire L, Meyerhoff Karen L, Hines Rachel E, Wilson Lindsay A, Viera Anthony J

机构信息

Corresponding author: Public Health Leadership Program, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Public Health Leadership Program, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

N C Med J. 2014 Jan-Feb;75(1):15-20. doi: 10.18043/ncm.75.1.15.

DOI:10.18043/ncm.75.1.15
PMID:24487752
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Association of American Medical Colleges and the World Health Organization have endorsed formal patient safety and quality improvement (QI) education for medical students. We surveyed medical students to assess their current level of patient safety and QI knowledge and to identify factors associated with increased knowledge.

METHODS

A literature review, focus groups with medical students, and local expert interviews were used to develop an electronic survey, which was distributed to all medical students at a single medical school in the spring of 2012.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven percent of the medical school student body (N = 790) participated in the survey. A greater proportion of students reported previous exposure to patient safety education than to QI education (79% vs 47%). Students scored an average of 56% and 58% on the patient safety and QI knowledge tests, respectively. Having or pursuing an advanced degree (P = .02) and previous exposure to patient safety education (P = .02) were associated with higher knowledge scores. After adjusting for confounding variables, only previous exposure to QI education (P = .02) was associated with higher QI knowledge scores.

LIMITATIONS

There is a risk of measurement bias due to the use of an unvalidated instrument. Students who have greater knowledge of patient safety or QI might recall exposure at a greater frequency, inflating the association between exposure and knowledge. Also, this is a cross-sectional study, so we cannot draw conclusions about causality.

CONCLUSION

Medical students' knowledge of patient safety and QI is low. Previous formal or informal education about these topics is associated with increased knowledge.

摘要

背景

美国医学院协会和世界卫生组织已认可对医学生进行正式的患者安全与质量改进(QI)教育。我们对医学生进行了调查,以评估他们目前的患者安全和QI知识水平,并确定与知识增加相关的因素。

方法

通过文献综述、与医学生进行焦点小组讨论以及与当地专家访谈,开发了一项电子调查问卷,并于2012年春季分发给一所医学院的所有医学生。

结果

该医学院学生群体的57%(N = 790)参与了调查。报告曾接受过患者安全教育的学生比例高于接受过QI教育的学生比例(79%对47%)。学生在患者安全和QI知识测试中的平均得分分别为56%和58%。拥有或正在攻读高级学位(P = .02)以及曾接受过患者安全教育(P = .02)与更高的知识得分相关。在对混杂变量进行调整后,只有曾接受过QI教育(P = .02)与更高的QI知识得分相关。

局限性

由于使用了未经验证的工具,存在测量偏倚的风险。对患者安全或QI有更多了解的学生可能会更频繁地回忆起相关接触经历,从而夸大接触与知识之间的关联。此外,这是一项横断面研究,因此我们无法得出因果关系的结论。

结论

医学生对患者安全和QI的知识水平较低。此前关于这些主题的正式或非正式教育与知识增加相关。

相似文献

1
A cross-sectional study of medical students' knowledge of patient safety and quality improvement.一项关于医学生患者安全与质量改进知识的横断面研究。
N C Med J. 2014 Jan-Feb;75(1):15-20. doi: 10.18043/ncm.75.1.15.
2
Patient safety and quality improvement education: a cross-sectional study of medical students' preferences and attitudes.患者安全与质量改进教育:对医学生偏好和态度的横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Feb 5;13:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-16.
3
Efficacy of quality improvement and patient safety workshops for students: a pilot study.针对学生的质量改进与患者安全工作坊的效果:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 23;20(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1982-3.
4
Can first-year medical students acquire quality improvement knowledge prior to substantial clinical exposure? A mixed-methods evaluation of a pre-clerkship curriculum that uses education as the context for learning.一年级医学生能否在大量临床接触之前获得质量改进知识?使用教育作为学习背景的预科课程的混合方法评估。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):576-582. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007566. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
5
Knowledge toward quality improvement among Jordanian nursing students: A cross-sectional study.约旦护理学生对质量改进的认识:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 8;19(10):e0311786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311786. eCollection 2024.
6
Creating Change: An Experiential Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Curriculum for Medical Students.创造变革:面向医学生的体验式质量改进与患者安全课程
MedEdPORTAL. 2018 Jan 8;14:10660. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10660.
7
An advanced quality improvement and patient safety elective.一门高级质量改进与患者安全选修课。
Clin Teach. 2013 Dec;10(6):368-73. doi: 10.1111/tct.12047.
8
An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students.面向三年级医学生的创新性质量改进课程。
Med Educ Online. 2012;17. doi: 10.3402/meo.v17i0.18391. Epub 2012 May 16.
9
Development and assessment of quality improvement education for medical students at The Ohio State University Medical Center.俄亥俄州立大学医学中心医学生质量改进教育的发展与评估。
J Healthc Qual. 2012 Nov-Dec;34(6):36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2012.00160.x.
10
An Interactive Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Workshop for First-Year Medical Students.面向一年级医学生的互动式质量改进与患者安全研讨会。
MedEdPORTAL. 2018 Aug 3;14:10734. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10734.

引用本文的文献

1
How Many Lives Will You Save? A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Novel, Online Game for Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Education.你将拯救多少生命?一项新型在线游戏用于患者安全和质量改进教育的混合方法评估。
Am J Med Qual. 2023 Nov 1;38(6):306-313. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000153. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
2
Assessment of Knowledge About Patient Safety Concepts Among Medical and Pharmacy Students.医学和药学专业学生对患者安全概念的知识评估
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2021 Apr 28;4(2):53-57. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-26. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Knowledge, perception and attitude of patient safety amongst clinical year physiotherapy students in Ghana.
加纳临床年级物理治疗专业学生对患者安全的认知、观念和态度。
S Afr J Physiother. 2021 Feb 19;77(1):1499. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1499. eCollection 2021.
4
Analysis of patient safety messages delivered and received during clinical rounds.临床查房中传递和接收的患者安全信息分析。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Jul;9(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000869.
5
Efficacy of quality improvement and patient safety workshops for students: a pilot study.针对学生的质量改进与患者安全工作坊的效果:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 23;20(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1982-3.
6
A UK Perspective on Human Factors and Patient Safety Education in Pharmacy Curricula.英国视角下的药学课程中的人为因素与患者安全教学
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Apr;82(3):6184. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6184.
7
Medical students' situational motivation to participate in simulation based team training is predicted by attitudes to patient safety.医学生参与基于模拟的团队培训的情境动机可由对患者安全的态度来预测。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Feb 10;17(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0876-5.
8
Patient safety education among chinese medical undergraduates: An empirical study.中国医学本科生的患者安全教育:一项实证研究。
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2016 Oct;36(5):780-784. doi: 10.1007/s11596-016-1661-0. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
9
Documentation of quality improvement exposure by internal medicine residency applicants.内科住院医师申请人的质量改进经历记录。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2016 Feb 17;6(1):29542. doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v6.29542. eCollection 2016.