Suppr超能文献

在腹壁成形术中结扎穿支血管可降低血清肿的风险。

Ligating perforators in abdominoplasty reduces the risk of seroma.

作者信息

Skillman J M, Venus M R, Nightingale P, Titley O G, Park A

机构信息

Plastic Surgery Department, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Walsgrave, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK,

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Apr;38(2):446-50. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0267-1. Epub 2014 Feb 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Seroma formation, a common complication of abdominoplasty, can cause patient discomfort and inconvenience. This study aimed to compare seroma rates after ligation and diathermy of large abdominal perforating vessels during abdominoplasty.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing abdominoplasty with epigastric undermining between 2004 and 2011 were studied. Body mass index (BMI), age at operation, smoking history, preoperative weight loss, operative details, perioperative fluid infiltration, concomitant abdominal liposuction, ligation of perforators by clips, suture or diathermy, use of quilting sutures, weight of tissue removed, postoperative drainage, inpatient stay, and seroma rates were recorded. Statistical analysis was undertaken using the unpaired t test, Fisher's exact test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and Kendall's tau-b test.

RESULTS

The study included 90 patients. The incidence of seroma was significantly lower among the patients who had perforators ligated (4/60, 6.7%) than among those who had diathermy (10/30, 33%) (p=0.002, Fisher's exact test). Seroma formation was significantly associated with a higher BMI, (27.45 vs. 25.16 kg/m2; p=0.025, t test) but not with preoperative weight loss. Postoperative fluid drainage did not differ significantly between ligated and diathermied perforators (p=0.716 Mann-Whitney U test).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of ligation by clip or suture rather than by diathermy to ablate large abdominal perforators significantly reduced the incidence of seroma among abdominoplasty patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

背景

血清肿形成是腹部整形术的常见并发症,可给患者带来不适与不便。本研究旨在比较腹部整形术中对腹部大型穿支血管进行结扎和电凝后血清肿的发生率。

方法

对2004年至2011年间连续接受上腹下潜行分离腹部整形术的患者进行研究。记录体重指数(BMI)、手术年龄、吸烟史、术前体重减轻情况、手术细节、围手术期液体浸润情况、同期腹部吸脂情况、用夹子、缝线或电凝法结扎穿支血管情况、使用褥式缝线情况、切除组织重量、术后引流情况、住院时间和血清肿发生率。采用非配对t检验、Fisher精确检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和Kendall's tau-b检验进行统计分析。

结果

该研究纳入了90例患者。结扎穿支血管的患者血清肿发生率(4/60,6.7%)显著低于进行电凝的患者(10/30,33%)(p = 0.002,Fisher精确检验)。血清肿形成与较高的BMI显著相关(27.45 vs. 25.16 kg/m2;p = 0.025,t检验),但与术前体重减轻无关。结扎和电凝穿支血管后术后液体引流量无显著差异(p = 0.716,Mann-Whitney U检验)。

结论

采用夹子或缝线结扎而非电凝法消融腹部大型穿支血管可显著降低腹部整形术患者血清肿的发生率。

证据级别IV:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据级别。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00266

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验