Albert Steven M, Edelstein Offer, King Jennifer, Flatt Jason, Lin Chyongchiou J, Boudreau Robert, Newman Anne B
Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, 208 Parran Hall, 130 Desoto Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA,
Prev Sci. 2015 Jan;16(1):31-40. doi: 10.1007/s11121-014-0466-2.
Current approaches to falls prevention mostly rely on secondary and tertiary prevention and target individuals at high risk of falls. An alternative is primary prevention, in which all seniors are screened, referred as appropriate, and educated regarding falls risk. Little information is available on research designs that allow investigation of this approach in the setting of aging services delivery, where randomization may not be possible. Healthy Steps for Older Adults, a statewide program of the Pennsylvania (PA) Department of Aging, involves a combination of education about falls and screening for balance problems, with referral to personal physicians and home safety assessments. We developed a non-randomized statewide trial, Falls Free PA, to assess its effectiveness in reducing falls incidence over 12 months. We recruited 814 seniors who completed the program (503 first-time participants, 311 people repeating the program) and 1,020 who did not participate in the program, from the same sites. We assessed the quality of this non-randomized design by examining recruitment, follow-up across study groups, and comparability at baseline. Of older adults approached in senior centers, 90.5 % (n = 2,219) signed informed consent, and 1,834 (82.4 %) completed baseline assessments and were eligible for follow-up. Attrition in the three groups over 12 months was low and non-differential (<10 % for withdrawal and <2 % for other loss to follow-up). Median follow-up, which involved standardized monthly assessment of falls, was 10 months in all study groups. At baseline, the groups did not differ in measures of health or falls risk factors. Comparable status at baseline, recruitment from common sites, and similar experience with retention suggest that the non-randomized design will be effective for assessment of this approach to primary prevention of falls.
目前预防跌倒的方法大多依赖二级和三级预防,针对的是跌倒风险高的个体。另一种方法是一级预防,即对所有老年人进行筛查,根据情况进行转诊,并就跌倒风险进行教育。关于能够在可能无法进行随机分组的老年服务提供环境中研究这种方法的研究设计,目前可用信息很少。“老年人健康步伐”是宾夕法尼亚州老龄部的一项全州性计划,它将跌倒教育与平衡问题筛查相结合,并转诊至私人医生处及进行家庭安全评估。我们开展了一项非随机的全州性试验“宾夕法尼亚无跌倒计划”,以评估其在12个月内降低跌倒发生率的有效性。我们从相同地点招募了814名完成该计划的老年人(503名首次参与者,311名重复参与该计划者)以及1020名未参与该计划的老年人。我们通过检查招募情况、各研究组的随访情况以及基线时的可比性,评估了这种非随机设计的质量。在老年中心接触的老年人中,90.5%(n = 2219)签署了知情同意书,1834人(82.4%)完成了基线评估并符合随访条件。三组在12个月内的失访率较低且无差异(退出率<10%,其他失访率<2%)。所有研究组的中位随访时间为10个月,其中包括对跌倒情况进行标准化的月度评估。在基线时,各组在健康指标或跌倒风险因素方面没有差异。基线时的可比状态、从共同地点招募以及相似的留存情况表明,这种非随机设计对于评估这种一级预防跌倒方法将是有效的。