Nigro Salvatore, Cerasa Antonio, Zito Giancarlo, Perrotta Paolo, Chiaravalloti Francesco, Donzuso Giulia, Fera Franceso, Bilotta Eleonora, Pantano Pietro, Quattrone Aldo
Institute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, National Research Council, Catanzaro, Italy.
Institute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, National Research Council, Catanzaro, Italy ; Institute of Neurology, University "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e85618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085618. eCollection 2014.
This paper describes a novel method to automatically segment the human brainstem into midbrain and pons, called labs: Landmark-based Automated Brainstem Segmentation. LABS processes high-resolution structural magnetic resonance images (MRIs) according to a revised landmark-based approach integrated with a thresholding method, without manual interaction.
This method was first tested on morphological T1-weighted MRIs of 30 healthy subjects. Its reliability was further confirmed by including neurological patients (with Alzheimer's Disease) from the ADNI repository, in whom the presence of volumetric loss within the brainstem had been previously described. Segmentation accuracies were evaluated against expert-drawn manual delineation. To evaluate the quality of LABS segmentation we used volumetric, spatial overlap and distance-based metrics.
The comparison between the quantitative measurements provided by LABS against manual segmentations revealed excellent results in healthy controls when considering either the midbrain (DICE measures higher that 0.9; Volume ratio around 1 and Hausdorff distance around 3) or the pons (DICE measures around 0.93; Volume ratio ranging 1.024-1.05 and Hausdorff distance around 2). Similar performances were detected for AD patients considering segmentation of the pons (DICE measures higher that 0.93; Volume ratio ranging from 0.97-0.98 and Hausdorff distance ranging 1.07-1.33), while LABS performed lower for the midbrain (DICE measures ranging 0.86-0.88; Volume ratio around 0.95 and Hausdorff distance ranging 1.71-2.15).
Our study represents the first attempt to validate a new fully automated method for in vivo segmentation of two anatomically complex brainstem subregions. We retain that our method might represent a useful tool for future applications in clinical practice.
本文描述了一种将人类脑干自动分割为中脑和脑桥的新方法,称为LABS:基于地标点的自动脑干分割法。LABS根据一种结合阈值法的改进型基于地标点的方法,对高分辨率结构磁共振图像(MRI)进行处理,无需人工干预。
该方法首先在30名健康受试者的形态学T1加权MRI上进行测试。通过纳入阿尔茨海默病神经影像学计划(ADNI)数据库中的神经疾病患者(患有阿尔茨海默病)进一步证实了其可靠性,此前已描述这些患者脑干内存在体积损失。分割准确性通过与专家绘制的手动轮廓进行对比评估。为了评估LABS分割的质量,我们使用了基于体积、空间重叠和距离的指标。
将LABS提供的定量测量结果与手动分割结果进行比较,发现在健康对照中,无论是中脑(DICE系数高于0.9;体积比约为1,豪斯多夫距离约为3)还是脑桥(DICE系数约为0.93;体积比在1.024 - 1.05之间,豪斯多夫距离约为2),结果都非常出色。对于阿尔茨海默病患者脑桥的分割(DICE系数高于0.93;体积比在0.97 - 0.98之间,豪斯多夫距离在1.07 - 1.33之间)也检测到了类似的性能,而LABS对中脑的分割表现较差(DICE系数在0.86 - 0.88之间;体积比约为0.95,豪斯多夫距离在1.71 - 2.15之间)。
我们的研究是首次尝试验证一种用于体内分割两个解剖结构复杂的脑干亚区域的全新全自动方法。我们认为我们的方法可能是未来临床实践中一种有用的工具。