Babalola K O, Patenaude B, Aljabar P, Schnabel J, Kennedy D, Crum W, Smith S, Cootes T F, Jenkinson M, Rueckert D
Division of Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, University of Manchester, UK.
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2008;11(Pt 1):409-16. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8_49.
The automation of segmentation of medical images is an active research area. However, there has been criticism of the standard of evaluation of methods. We have comprehensively evaluated four novel methods of automatically segmenting subcortical structures using volumetric, spatial overlap and distance-based measures. Two of the methods are atlas-based - classifier fusion and labelling (CFL) and expectation-maximisation segmentation using a dynamic brain atlas (EMS), and two model-based - profile active appearance models (PAM) and Bayesian appearance models (BAM). Each method was applied to the segmentation of 18 subcortical structures in 270 subjects from a diverse pool varying in age, disease, sex and image acquisition parameters. Our results showed that all four methods perform on par with recently published methods. CFL performed significantly better than the other three methods according to all three classes of metrics.
医学图像分割的自动化是一个活跃的研究领域。然而,对于方法的评估标准一直存在批评意见。我们使用体积、空间重叠和基于距离的度量方法,对四种自动分割皮质下结构的新方法进行了全面评估。其中两种方法是基于图谱的——分类器融合与标记(CFL)以及使用动态脑图谱的期望最大化分割(EMS),另外两种是基于模型的——轮廓主动外观模型(PAM)和贝叶斯外观模型(BAM)。每种方法都应用于来自不同年龄、疾病、性别和图像采集参数的270名受试者的18个皮质下结构的分割。我们的结果表明,所有四种方法的表现与最近发表的方法相当。根据所有三类度量标准,CFL的表现明显优于其他三种方法。