• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些因素影响了自行车手过去和未来事故之间的关联?倾向得分分析。

What influences the association between previous and future crashes among cyclists? A propensity score analysis.

机构信息

Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e87633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087633. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0087633
PMID:24489945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3906177/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is known that experience of a previous crash is related to incidence of future crashes in a cohort of New Zealand cyclists. This paper investigated if the strength of such association differed by crash involvement propensity and by the need for medical care in the previous crash.

METHODS

The Taupo Bicycle Study involved 2590 adult cyclists recruited in 2006 and followed over a median period of 4.6 years through linkage to four national databases. The crash involvement propensity was estimated using propensity scores based on the participants' demographic, cycling and residential characteristics. Cox regression modelling for repeated events was performed with multivariate and propensity score adjustments. Analyses were then stratified by quintiles of the propensity score.

RESULTS

A total of 801 (31.0%) participants reported having experienced at least one bicycle crash in the twelve months prior to the baseline survey. They had a higher risk of experiencing crash events during follow-up (hazard ratio (HR): 1.43; 95% CI: 1.28, 1.60) but in the stratified analysis, this association was significant only in the highest two quintiles of the propensity score where the likelihood of having experienced a crash was more than 33%. The association was stronger for previous crashes that had received medical care (HR 1.63; 95% CI: 1.41, 1.88) compared to those that had not (HR 1.30; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Previous crash experience increased the risk of future crash involvement in high-risk cyclists and the association was stronger for previous crashes attended medically. What distinguishes the high risk group warrants closer investigation, and the findings indicate also that health service providers could play an important role in prevention of bicycle crash injuries.

摘要

背景

已知在新西兰的一组自行车手群体中,以往的撞车经历与未来撞车事件的发生有关。本文调查了这种关联的强度是否因撞车参与倾向以及以往撞车事故中是否需要医疗护理而有所不同。

方法

陶波自行车研究涉及 2590 名成年自行车手,他们于 2006 年招募并通过与四个国家数据库的链接,在中位数为 4.6 年的时间内进行随访。使用基于参与者的人口统计学、自行车和居住特征的倾向得分来估计撞车参与倾向。使用多变量和倾向得分调整进行重复事件的 Cox 回归建模。然后根据倾向得分的五分位数进行分层分析。

结果

共有 801 名(31.0%)参与者报告在基线调查前的 12 个月内至少经历过一次自行车撞车事故。他们在随访期间发生撞车事件的风险更高(风险比(HR):1.43;95%置信区间(CI):1.28,1.60),但在分层分析中,这种关联仅在倾向得分最高的两个五分位数中显著,在这两个五分位数中,发生撞车的可能性超过 33%。与未接受医疗护理的以往撞车事故相比,接受医疗护理的以往撞车事故(HR 1.63;95%CI:1.41,1.88)的关联更强。

结论

以往的撞车经历增加了高风险自行车手未来发生撞车事故的风险,且与以往接受过医疗护理的撞车事故的关联更强。需要更密切调查区分高风险群体的因素,研究结果还表明,卫生服务提供者可以在预防自行车撞车损伤方面发挥重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fddd/3906177/90b90a26095c/pone.0087633.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fddd/3906177/90b90a26095c/pone.0087633.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fddd/3906177/90b90a26095c/pone.0087633.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
What influences the association between previous and future crashes among cyclists? A propensity score analysis.哪些因素影响了自行车手过去和未来事故之间的关联?倾向得分分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e87633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087633. eCollection 2014.
2
Estimating bias from loss to follow-up in a prospective cohort study of bicycle crash injuries.在一项关于自行车碰撞损伤的前瞻性队列研究中,评估失访导致的偏倚。
Inj Prev. 2014 Oct;20(5):322-9. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040997. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
3
Bicycling crash characteristics: An in-depth crash investigation study.自行车碰撞特征:一项深入的碰撞调查研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Nov;96:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
4
The role of conspicuity in preventing bicycle crashes involving a motor vehicle.醒目性在预防涉及机动车的自行车碰撞事故中的作用。
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Jun;25(3):517-22. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku117. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
5
Incidence, risk, and protective factors of bicycle crashes: findings from a prospective cohort study in New Zealand.自行车事故的发生率、风险因素和保护因素:来自新西兰一项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Prev Med. 2013 Sep;57(3):152-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 May 21.
6
Crash characteristics of on-road single-bicycle crashes: an under-recognised problem.道路上单人自行车事故的碰撞特征:一个被低估的问题。
Inj Prev. 2019 Oct;25(5):448-452. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2018-043014. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
7
Crashes involving cyclists aged 50 and over in the Netherlands: An in-depth study.荷兰涉及50岁及以上自行车骑行者的撞车事故:一项深入研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Aug;105:4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
8
Completeness and accuracy of crash outcome data in a cohort of cyclists: a validation study.自行车骑手队列中碰撞结局数据的完整性和准确性:验证性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 1;13:420. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-420.
9
Analysis of bicycle crashes in Sweden involving injuries with high risk of health loss.瑞典涉及健康损失高风险伤害的自行车事故分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(6):613-618. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1614567. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
Scenarios of crashes involving light mopeds on urban bicycle paths.涉及城市自行车道上轻型助力车的碰撞场景。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:334-341. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence, risk, and protective factors of bicycle crashes: findings from a prospective cohort study in New Zealand.自行车事故的发生率、风险因素和保护因素:来自新西兰一项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Prev Med. 2013 Sep;57(3):152-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 May 21.
2
Completeness and accuracy of crash outcome data in a cohort of cyclists: a validation study.自行车骑手队列中碰撞结局数据的完整性和准确性:验证性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 1;13:420. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-420.
3
Accident proneness revisited: the role of psychological stress and cognitive failure.
事故倾向再探:心理压力和认知失败的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Nov;49:532-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.028. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
4
Application of propensity scores and potential outcomes to estimate effectiveness of traffic safety countermeasures: Exploratory analysis using intersection lighting data.应用倾向评分和潜在结果估计交通安全措施的效果:使用交叉口照明数据的探索性分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:539-53. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.05.036. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
5
Estimating person-based injury incidence: accuracy of an algorithm to identify readmissions from hospital discharge data.基于个体的伤害发生率估计:从医院出院数据中识别再入院的算法的准确性。
Inj Prev. 2011 Oct;17(5):338-42. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040090. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
6
Past injury as a risk factor: an illustrative example where appearances are deceiving.既往损伤作为一个风险因素:一个有误导性表象的实例。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr 15;173(8):941-8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq461. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
7
Injuries to pedal cyclists on New Zealand roads, 1988-2007.新西兰道路上的骑车人伤害,1988-2007 年。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Oct 30;10:655. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-655.
8
Conspicuity and bicycle crashes: preliminary findings of the Taupo Bicycle Study.醒目性与自行车碰撞事故:陶波自行车研究的初步结果
Inj Prev. 2008 Feb;14(1):11-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.2007.016675.
9
A survey of ED injury prevention activities.
J Emerg Nurs. 2008 Feb;34(1):61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2007.10.013.
10
Injury prevention activities in U.S. trauma centres: are we doing enough?美国创伤中心的伤害预防活动:我们做得够吗?
Injury. 2007 May;38(5):538-47. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.11.020. Epub 2007 Feb 20.