J Trauma Stress. 2013 Dec;26(6):718-26. doi: 10.1002/jts.21863.
Researchers have been investigating possible pathways to negative (posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]) and positive (posttraumatic growth [PTG]) reactions to trauma in recent decades. Two cognitive constructs, event centrality and posttraumatic cognitions, have been implicated to uniquely predict PTSD symptoms in an undergraduate sample. The current pair of studies attempted to (a) replicate this finding in an undergraduate sample, (b) replicate this finding in a treatment-seeking sample, and (c) explore whether these 2 cognitive constructs uniquely predict PTG. The first study consisted of 500 undergraduate students, whereas the second study consisted of 53 treatment-seeking clients. Results indicated both posttraumatic cognitions and event centrality uniquely predicted PTSD in the undergraduate (R(2) = .46) and treatment-seeking samples (R(2) = .46). These 2 cognitive constructs also predicted PTG in the undergraduate sample (R(2) = .37), but only posttraumatic cognitions predicted PTG in the treatment-seeking sample (R(2) = .17). The relationships between PTG varied, depending on whether PTG for high or low event-centrality events were assessed. The original model was supported within both populations for PTSD symptoms, and its extension to PTG was supported within the treatment-seeking sample. These results underscore cognitive and narrative factors in the progression of trauma.
近几十年来,研究人员一直在研究创伤后产生负面(创伤后应激障碍 [PTSD])和正面(创伤后成长 [PTG])反应的可能途径。两种认知结构,事件中心性和创伤后认知,被认为可以独特地预测大学生样本中的 PTSD 症状。目前的两项研究试图 (a) 在大学生样本中复制这一发现,(b) 在寻求治疗的样本中复制这一发现,以及 (c) 探索这两种认知结构是否可以独特地预测 PTG。第一项研究包括 500 名大学生,第二项研究包括 53 名寻求治疗的客户。结果表明,创伤后认知和事件中心性在大学生(R(2) =.46)和寻求治疗的样本(R(2) =.46)中都可以独特地预测 PTSD。这两种认知结构也可以预测大学生样本中的 PTG(R(2) =.37),但只有创伤后认知可以预测治疗样本中的 PTG(R(2) =.17)。PTG 的关系因评估的是高事件中心性事件还是低事件中心性事件而有所不同。原始模型在 PTSD 症状的两个群体中都得到了支持,其对 PTG 的扩展在寻求治疗的样本中也得到了支持。这些结果强调了认知和叙事因素在创伤进展中的作用。