Fisher L, Hessler D, Masharani U, Strycker L
Departments of Family and Community Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Diabet Med. 2014 Jun;31(6):739-46. doi: 10.1111/dme.12403. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
To improve patient-centred care by determining the impact of baseline levels of conscientiousness and diabetes self-efficacy on the outcomes of efficacious interventions to reduce diabetes distress and improve disease management.
Adults with Type 2 diabetes with diabetes distress and self-care problems (N = 392) were randomized to one of three distress reduction interventions: computer-assisted self-management; computer-assisted self-management plus problem-solving therapy; and health education. The baseline assessment included conscientiousness and self-efficacy, demographics, diabetes status, regimen distress, emotional burden, medication adherence, diet and physical activity. Changes in regimen distress, emotional burden and self-care between baseline and 12 months were recorded and ancova models assessed how conscientiousness and self-efficacy qualified the significant improvements in distress and management outcomes.
Participants with high baseline conscientiousness displayed significantly larger improvements in medication adherence and emotional burden than participants with low baseline conscientiousness. Participants with high baseline self-efficacy showed greater improvements in diet, physical activity and regimen distress than participants with low baseline self-efficacy. The impact of conscientiousness and self-efficacy were independent of each other and occurred across all three intervention groups. A significant interaction indicated that those with both high self-efficacy and high conscientiousness at baseline had the biggest improvement in physical activity by 12 months.
Both broad personal traits and disease-specific expectations qualify the outcomes of efficacious interventions. These findings reinforce the need to change from a one-size-fits-all approach to diabetes interventions to an approach that crafts clinical interventions in ways that fit the personal traits and skills of individual people.
通过确定尽责性和糖尿病自我效能感的基线水平对有效干预措施的结果的影响,以改善以患者为中心的护理,这些干预措施旨在减轻糖尿病困扰并改善疾病管理。
患有糖尿病困扰和自我护理问题的2型糖尿病成年人(N = 392)被随机分配到三种减轻困扰的干预措施之一:计算机辅助自我管理;计算机辅助自我管理加解决问题疗法;以及健康教育。基线评估包括尽责性和自我效能感、人口统计学、糖尿病状况、治疗方案困扰、情绪负担、药物依从性、饮食和身体活动。记录基线和12个月之间治疗方案困扰、情绪负担和自我护理的变化,并使用协方差分析模型评估尽责性和自我效能感如何影响困扰和管理结果的显著改善。
基线尽责性高的参与者在药物依从性和情绪负担方面的改善明显大于基线尽责性低的参与者。基线自我效能感高的参与者在饮食、身体活动和治疗方案困扰方面的改善比基线自我效能感低的参与者更大。尽责性和自我效能感的影响相互独立,且在所有三个干预组中均有发生。显著的交互作用表明,基线时自我效能感和尽责性都高的参与者在12个月时身体活动的改善最大。
广泛的个人特质和特定疾病的期望都会影响有效干预措施的结果。这些发现强化了从一刀切的糖尿病干预方法转变为根据个人特质和技能制定临床干预措施的方法的必要性。