• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病困扰何时具有临床意义?:确立糖尿病困扰量表的切点。

When is diabetes distress clinically meaningful?: establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale.

机构信息

Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2012 Feb;35(2):259-64. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1572. Epub 2012 Jan 6.

DOI:10.2337/dc11-1572
PMID:22228744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3263871/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the pattern of relationships between the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17) and diabetes variables to establish scale cut points for high distress among patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Recruited were 506 study 1 and 392 study 2 adults with type 2 diabetes from community medical groups. Multiple regression equations associated the DDS17, a 17-item scale that yields a mean-item score, with HbA(1c), diabetes self-efficacy, diet, and physical activity. Associations also were undertaken for the two-item DDS (DDS2) screener. Analyses included control variables, linear, and quadratic (curvilinear) DDS terms.

RESULTS

Significant quadratic effects occurred between the DDS17 and each diabetes variable, with increases in distress associated with poorer outcomes: study 1 HbA(1c) (P < 0.02), self-efficacy (P < 0.001), diet (P < 0.001), physical activity (P < 0.04); study 2 HbA(1c) (P < 0.03), self-efficacy (P < 0.004), diet (P < 0.04), physical activity (P = NS). Substantive curvilinear associations with all four variables in both studies began at unexpectedly low levels of DDS17: the slope increased linearly between scores 1 and 2, was more muted between 2 and 3, and reached a maximum between 3 and 4. This suggested three patient subgroups: little or no distress, <2.0; moderate distress, 2.0-2.9; high distress, ≥3.0. Parallel findings occurred for the DDS2.

CONCLUSIONS

In two samples of type 2 diabetic patients we found a consistent pattern of curvilinear relationships between the DDS and HbA(1c), diabetes self-efficacy, diet, and physical activity. The shape of these relationships suggests cut points for three patient groups: little or no, moderate, and high distress.

摘要

目的

确定 17 项糖尿病困扰量表(DDS17)与糖尿病变量之间关系的模式,为 2 型糖尿病患者建立高困扰的量表切点。

研究设计和方法

从社区医疗小组招募了 506 名研究 1 和 392 名研究 2 的成年 2 型糖尿病患者。多元回归方程将 DDS17(一种产生平均项目得分的 17 项量表)与 HbA(1c)、糖尿病自我效能、饮食和身体活动相关联。还对两项 DDS(DDS2)筛查器进行了关联分析。分析包括控制变量、线性和二次(曲线)DDS 项。

结果

DDS17 与每个糖尿病变量之间均存在显著的二次效应,困扰程度的增加与较差的结果相关:研究 1 HbA(1c)(P < 0.02)、自我效能(P < 0.001)、饮食(P < 0.001)、身体活动(P < 0.04);研究 2 HbA(1c)(P < 0.03)、自我效能(P < 0.004)、饮食(P < 0.04)、身体活动(P = NS)。在两项研究中,与所有四个变量的实质性曲线关联始于异常低的 DDS17 水平:分数在 1 到 2 之间呈线性增加,在 2 到 3 之间变得更为柔和,在 3 到 4 之间达到最大值。这表明存在三个患者亚组:几乎没有或没有困扰,<2.0;中度困扰,2.0-2.9;高度困扰,≥3.0。DDS2 也存在类似的发现。

结论

在两个 2 型糖尿病患者样本中,我们发现 DDS 与 HbA(1c)、糖尿病自我效能、饮食和身体活动之间存在一致的曲线关系模式。这些关系的形状表明了三个患者组的切点:几乎没有或没有困扰、中度困扰和高度困扰。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b46/3263871/6e932affd552/259fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b46/3263871/6e932affd552/259fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b46/3263871/6e932affd552/259fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
When is diabetes distress clinically meaningful?: establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale.糖尿病困扰何时具有临床意义?:确立糖尿病困扰量表的切点。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Feb;35(2):259-64. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1572. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
2
Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument.一种简短的糖尿病困扰筛查工具的开发。
Ann Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun;6(3):246-52. doi: 10.1370/afm.842.
3
Diabetes distress in Type 1 diabetes--a new measurement fit for purpose.1 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病困扰——一种新的符合目的的测量方法。
Diabet Med. 2013 Sep;30(9):1132-9. doi: 10.1111/dme.12241. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
4
Validation of the Diabetes Distress Scale in an Asian Pacific Islander Population.糖尿病痛苦量表在亚太岛民人群中的验证
Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2019 Jan;78(1):3-7.
5
Self-efficacy mediates the associations of diabetes distress and depressive symptoms with type 2 diabetes management and glycemic control.自我效能在糖尿病困扰和抑郁症状与 2 型糖尿病管理和血糖控制的关系中起中介作用。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2022 Sep-Oct;78:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
6
Diabetes-related distress and its associated factors among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in China.中国 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病相关困扰及其相关因素。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Jun;252:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.049. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
7
How to assess diabetes distress: comparison of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS).如何评估糖尿病困扰:糖尿病问题领域量表(PAID)与糖尿病困扰量表(DDS)的比较
Diabet Med. 2016 Jun;33(6):835-43. doi: 10.1111/dme.12887. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
8
Diabetes-related emotional distress in adults: reliability and validity of the Norwegian versions of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS).成人糖尿病相关情绪困扰:糖尿病问题区域量表(PAID)和糖尿病困扰量表(DDS)挪威语版本的信度和效度。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Feb;49(2):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
9
Translation, Revision, and Validation of the Diabetes Distress Scale for Indonesian Type 2 Diabetic Outpatients with Various Types of Complications.印度尼西亚2型糖尿病合并多种并发症门诊患者糖尿病痛苦量表的翻译、修订及验证
Value Health Reg Issues. 2017 May;12:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 May 4.
10
Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale.评估糖尿病患者的心理社会困扰:糖尿病困扰量表的编制
Diabetes Care. 2005 Mar;28(3):626-31. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.626.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetes Distress and Self-Efficacy Mediate the Relationship Between Family Function and Coping in Young and Middle-Aged Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.糖尿病困扰和自我效能在中青年2型糖尿病患者的家庭功能与应对之间起中介作用。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2025 Sep 6;18:3283-3295. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S530882. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the Clinical Feasibility of the DiaFocus System for Integrated Personalized Management of Type 2 Diabetes: 6-Month Pilot Cohort Study.评估DiaFocus系统用于2型糖尿病综合个性化管理的临床可行性:6个月的试点队列研究。
JMIR Diabetes. 2025 Aug 25;10:e63894. doi: 10.2196/63894.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Engagement in a diabetes self-management website: usage patterns and generalizability of program use.参与糖尿病自我管理网站:使用模式及项目使用的普遍性
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 25;13(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1391.
2
Depression in diabetes: have we been missing something important?糖尿病中的抑郁症:我们是否忽略了某些重要因素?
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34(1):236-9. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1970.
3
Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.
A phased online support program improves self-efficacy and reduces distress in type 2 diabetes patients using mixed methods design.
一项采用混合方法设计的分阶段在线支持项目提高了2型糖尿病患者的自我效能并减轻了他们的痛苦。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 13;15(1):29731. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15786-z.
4
Lack of Association of Emotional Distress With Insulin Initiation in the GRADE Randomized Diabetes Comparative Effectiveness Trial.在GRADE随机糖尿病比较疗效试验中,情绪困扰与开始使用胰岛素之间缺乏关联。
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2025 Aug;51(4):382-393. doi: 10.1177/26350106251361363. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
5
Understanding primary care provider perspectives of the implementation of an integrated diabetes and mental health care solution.了解初级保健提供者对实施糖尿病与心理健康综合护理解决方案的看法。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 Jul 18;26:e63. doi: 10.1017/S1463423625100236.
6
Lifestyle Interventions for Treatment and Remission of Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes in Adults: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Lifestyle Medicine.成人2型糖尿病和糖尿病前期治疗与缓解的生活方式干预:美国生活方式医学学院临床实践指南
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2025 Jun 10;19(2 Suppl):10S-131S. doi: 10.1177/15598276251325488. eCollection 2025 Jul.
7
Differences between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity Management: Medical, Social, and Public Health Perspectives.2型糖尿病与肥胖管理的差异:医学、社会和公共卫生视角
Diabetes Metab J. 2025 Jul;49(4):565-579. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2025.0278. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
8
Analyzing Medication Adherence Patterns Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Thi-Qar, Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Study.伊拉克济加尔省2型糖尿病患者用药依从性模式分析:一项横断面研究
J Diabetes Res. 2025 May 16;2025:6659722. doi: 10.1155/jdr/6659722. eCollection 2025.
9
Occurrence and Predictors of Diabetes Distress in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes from North India.印度北部成年2型糖尿病患者糖尿病痛苦的发生率及预测因素
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Mar-Apr;29(2):202-208. doi: 10.4103/ijem.ijem_170_24. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
10
Safety of a Novel Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Informed Insulin Bolus Calculator Mobile Application for People With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes.一款新型的基于持续葡萄糖监测的胰岛素大剂量计算器移动应用程序对1型或2型糖尿病患者的安全性
Diabetes Spectr. 2024 Nov 11;38(2):153-160. doi: 10.2337/ds24-0032. eCollection 2025 Spring.
在横断面和纵向分析中,糖尿病困扰而不是临床抑郁或抑郁症状与血糖控制有关。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33(1):23-8. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1238. Epub 2009 Oct 16.
4
Predicting diabetes distress in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study.预测 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病困扰:一项纵向研究。
Diabet Med. 2009 Jun;26(6):622-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02730.x.
5
A longitudinal study of affective and anxiety disorders, depressive affect and diabetes distress in adults with Type 2 diabetes.一项针对2型糖尿病成年患者情感与焦虑障碍、抑郁情绪及糖尿病困扰的纵向研究。
Diabet Med. 2008 Sep;25(9):1096-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02533.x.
6
Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument.一种简短的糖尿病困扰筛查工具的开发。
Ann Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun;6(3):246-52. doi: 10.1370/afm.842.
7
Clinical depression versus distress among patients with type 2 diabetes: not just a question of semantics.2型糖尿病患者中的临床抑郁症与痛苦:不只是语义问题。
Diabetes Care. 2007 Mar;30(3):542-8. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1614.
8
Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale.评估糖尿病患者的心理社会困扰:糖尿病困扰量表的编制
Diabetes Care. 2005 Mar;28(3):626-31. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.626.
9
Cutpoint selection for categorizing a continuous predictor.用于对连续预测变量进行分类的切点选择。
Biometrics. 2004 Jun;60(2):504-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00196.x.
10
Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation.健康相关生活质量变化的解读:半个标准差的显著普遍性。
Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C.