Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA Emory Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA Emory Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;40(3):587-94. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2014-131343.
Most studies evaluating Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers longitudinally have studied patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who progress to AD; data on normal subjects are scarce. We studied which biomarkers best predict cognitive decline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) among those with normal cognition at baseline, and derived cut points to predict decline. We studied 191 subjects in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) who had normal cognition at baseline, 2 + visits (mean follow-up 3.1 years), and data on neuropsychological tests, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, and structural MRI. We used repeated measures linear regression of log ADAS-Cog on age, race, gender, education, APOE4 status, baseline biomarker values, and follow-up time; an interaction between biomarker and time assessed predictive power. Neuropsychological tests did not significantly predict ADAS-Cog decline, while both MRI variables and CSF biomarkers did; CSF markers were the strongest predictors. Optimal cut points for baseline CSF markers to distinguish decliners were < 220 pg/ml (Aβ42), ≥61 pg/ml (t-tau), ≥21 pg/ml (p-tau), ≥0.31 (t-tau/Aβ42), and ≥0.10 (p-tau/Aβ42). For progression to MCI/AD (n = 28), the best markers were t-tau, t-tau/Aβ42, and p-tau/Aβ42, with optimal cut points of 58, 0.31, and 0.08, respectively. The optimal cut points across all markers and cut points predicted decline in ADAS-Cog, as well as transition to MCI, with a 65% accuracy. Our findings support current models of AD progression and suggest it is feasible to establish biomarker criteria to predict cognitive decline in individuals with normal cognition. Larger studies will be needed to more accurately characterize optimal cut points.
大多数评估阿尔茨海默病(AD)生物标志物的纵向研究都研究了从轻度认知障碍(MCI)进展为 AD 的患者;关于正常受试者的数据很少。我们研究了哪些生物标志物在基线时认知正常的患者中最能预测阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知子量表(ADAS-Cog)的认知下降,并得出了预测下降的切点。我们研究了阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)中的 191 名受试者,他们在基线时有正常的认知,有 2 次就诊(平均随访 3.1 年),并有神经心理学测试、脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物和结构 MRI 的数据。我们使用 ADAS-Cog 对数的重复测量线性回归模型,模型中包括年龄、种族、性别、教育、APOE4 状态、基线生物标志物值和随访时间;生物标志物和时间之间的相互作用评估了预测能力。神经心理学测试并不能显著预测 ADAS-Cog 的下降,而 MRI 变量和 CSF 生物标志物则可以;CSF 标志物是最强的预测因子。区分下降者的基线 CSF 标志物的最佳切点分别为 <220pg/ml(Aβ42)、≥61pg/ml(t-tau)、≥21pg/ml(p-tau)、≥0.31(t-tau/Aβ42)和≥0.10(p-tau/Aβ42)。对于进展为 MCI/AD(n=28),最佳标志物为 t-tau、t-tau/Aβ42 和 p-tau/Aβ42,最佳切点分别为 58、0.31 和 0.08。所有标志物和切点的最佳切点都可以预测 ADAS-Cog 的下降,以及向 MCI 的转变,准确率为 65%。我们的研究结果支持 AD 进展的现有模型,并表明建立预测认知正常个体认知下降的生物标志物标准是可行的。需要更大的研究来更准确地描述最佳切点。