Department of Criminology, Law, and Society, University of California, 3331 Social Ecology II, Irvine, CA, 92697-7080, USA,
Am J Community Psychol. 2014 Jun;53(3-4):447-61. doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9639-1.
Community scholars increasingly focus on the linkage between residents' sense of cohesion with the neighborhood and their own social networks in the neighborhood. A challenge is that whereas some research only focuses on residents' social ties with fellow neighbors, such an approach misses out on the larger constellation of individuals' relationships and the spatial distribution of those relationships. Using data from the Twin Communities Network Study, the current project is one of the first studies to examine the actual spatial distribution of respondents' networks for a variety of relationships and the consequences of these for neighborhood and city cohesion. We also examine how a perceived structural measure of cohesion-triangle degree-impacts their perceptions of neighborhood and city cohesion. Our findings suggest that perceptions of cohesion within the neighborhood and the city depend on the number of neighborhood safety contacts as well as on the types of people with which they discuss important matters. On the other hand, kin and social friendship ties do not impact cohesion. A key finding is that residents who report more spatially dispersed networks for certain types of ties report lower levels of neighborhood and city cohesion. Residents with higher triangle degree within their neighborhood safety networks perceived more neighborhood cohesion.
社区学者越来越关注居民对邻里的凝聚力以及他们在邻里中的社交网络之间的联系。一个挑战是,虽然有些研究只关注居民与邻居的社会联系,但这种方法忽略了更大的个体关系网络以及这些关系的空间分布。利用来自双胞胎社区网络研究的数据,本项目是首批研究各种关系中受访者网络的实际空间分布及其对邻里和城市凝聚力的影响的研究之一。我们还研究了凝聚力的感知结构衡量标准——三角形程度如何影响他们对邻里和城市凝聚力的看法。我们的研究结果表明,对邻里和城市的凝聚力的看法取决于邻里安全联系人的数量以及他们讨论重要事项的人的类型。另一方面,亲属和社会友谊关系不会影响凝聚力。一个关键的发现是,报告某些类型关系的网络空间分布更为分散的居民报告的邻里和城市凝聚力水平较低。邻里安全网络中三角形程度较高的居民感知到更多的邻里凝聚力。