School of Social Science and Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Sep;52(1-2):115-27. doi: 10.1007/s10464-013-9582-6.
In the neighborhood effects literature, collective efficacy is viewed as the key explanatory process associated with the spatial distribution of a range of social problems. While many studies usefully focus on the consequences of collective efficacy, in this paper we examine the task specificity of collective efficacy and consider the individual and neighborhood factors that influence residents' perceptions of neighborhood collective efficacy for specific tasks. Utilizing survey and administrative data from 4,093 residents nested in 148 communities in Australia, we distinguish collective efficacy for particular threats to social order and assess the relative importance of social cohesion and neighborhood social ties to the development of collective efficacy for violence, delinquency and civic/political issues. Our results indicate that a model separating collective efficacy for specific problems from social ties and the more generalized notions of social cohesion is necessary when understanding the regulation potential of neighborhoods.
在邻里效应文献中,集体效能被视为与一系列社会问题的空间分布相关的关键解释过程。虽然许多研究都集中在集体效能的后果上,但在本文中,我们考察了集体效能的任务特异性,并考虑了影响居民对特定任务的邻里集体效能感知的个体和邻里因素。我们利用来自澳大利亚 148 个社区的 4093 名居民的调查和行政数据,区分了对社会秩序受到特定威胁的集体效能,并评估了社会凝聚力和邻里社会关系对暴力、犯罪和公民/政治问题的集体效能发展的相对重要性。我们的结果表明,在理解邻里的监管潜力时,需要将针对特定问题的集体效能与社会关系以及更普遍的社会凝聚力概念分开来建模。