Høg Erling
a LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science , London , UK.
Glob Public Health. 2014;9(1-2):210-23. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.881522. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
The large-scale introduction of HIV and AIDS services in Mozambique from 2000 onwards occurred in the context of deep political commitment to sovereign nation-building and an important transition in the nation's health system. Simultaneously, the international community encountered a willing state partner that recognised the need to take action against the HIV epidemic. This article examines two critical policy shifts: sustained international funding and public health system integration (the move from parallel to integrated HIV services). The Mozambican government struggles to support its national health system against privatisation, NGO competition and internal brain drain. This is a sovereignty issue. However, the dominant discourse on self-determination shows a contradictory twist: it is part of the political rhetoric to keep the sovereignty discourse alive, while the real challenge is coordination, not partnerships. Nevertheless, we need more anthropological studies to understand the political implications of global health funding and governance. Other studies need to examine the consequences of public health system integration for the quality of access to health care.
2000年起,莫桑比克大规模引入艾滋病毒和艾滋病服务,这是在该国对主权国家建设有着深厚政治承诺以及国家卫生系统发生重要转变的背景下进行的。与此同时,国际社会遇到了一个愿意合作的国家伙伴,该伙伴认识到需要采取行动应对艾滋病毒疫情。本文探讨了两个关键的政策转变:持续的国际资金投入和公共卫生系统整合(从并行的艾滋病毒服务转向整合的服务)。莫桑比克政府努力支持其国家卫生系统,以抵御私有化、非政府组织竞争和人才外流。这是一个主权问题。然而,关于自决的主流话语呈现出一种矛盾的转折:它是保持主权话语活力的政治言辞的一部分,而真正的挑战是协调,而非伙伴关系。尽管如此,我们需要更多的人类学研究来理解全球卫生资金和治理的政治影响。其他研究需要考察公共卫生系统整合对医疗服务可及质量的影响。