Suppr超能文献

在一项随机对照试验中,计划行为理论变量与客观步行行为未表现出季节性变化。

Theory of planned behaviour variables and objective walking behaviour do not show seasonal variation in a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Williams Stefanie L, French David P

机构信息

Applied Research Centre in Health and Lifestyle Interventions, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2014 Feb 5;14:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-120.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Longitudinal studies have shown that objectively measured walking behaviour is subject to seasonal variation, with people walking more in summer compared to winter. Seasonality therefore may have the potential to bias the results of randomised controlled trials if there are not adequate statistical or design controls. Despite this there are no studies that assess the impact of seasonality on walking behaviour in a randomised controlled trial, to quantify the extent of such bias. Further there have been no studies assessing how season impacts on the psychological predictors of walking behaviour to date. The aim of the present study was to assess seasonal differences in a) objective walking behaviour and b) Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) variables during a randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote walking.

METHODS

315 patients were recruited to a two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote walking in primary care. A series of repeated measures ANCOVAs were conducted to examine the effect of season on pedometer measures of walking behaviour and TPB measures, assessed immediately post-intervention and six months later. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to assess whether season moderated the prediction of intention and behaviour by TPB measures.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in time spent walking in spring/summer compared to autumn/winter. There was no significant seasonal variation in most TPB variables, although the belief that there will be good weather was significantly higher in spring/summer (F = 19.46, p < .001). Season did not significantly predict intention or objective walking behaviour, or moderate the effects of TPB variables on intention or behaviour.

CONCLUSION

Seasonality does not influence objectively measured walking behaviour or psychological variables during a randomised controlled trial. Consequently physical activity behaviour outcomes in trials will not be biased by the season in which they are measured. Previous studies may have overestimated the extent of seasonality effects by selecting the most extreme summer and winter months to assess PA. In addition, participants recruited to behaviour change interventions might have higher levels of motivation to change and are less affected by seasonal barriers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95932902.

摘要

背景

纵向研究表明,客观测量的步行行为存在季节性变化,与冬季相比,人们在夏季步行更多。因此,如果没有足够的统计或设计控制,季节性可能会使随机对照试验的结果产生偏差。尽管如此,尚无研究评估季节性在随机对照试验中对步行行为的影响,以量化这种偏差的程度。此外,迄今为止,尚无研究评估季节如何影响步行行为的心理预测因素。本研究的目的是在一项促进步行的干预措施的随机对照试验中,评估a)客观步行行为和b)计划行为理论(TPB)变量的季节性差异。

方法

315名患者被招募到一项在初级保健中促进步行的干预措施的双臂整群随机对照试验中。进行了一系列重复测量协方差分析,以检查季节对步行行为的计步器测量和TPB测量的影响,在干预后立即和六个月后进行评估。进行分层回归分析,以评估季节是否调节了TPB测量对意图和行为的预测。

结果

与秋冬相比,春夏季节的步行时间没有显著差异。大多数TPB变量没有显著的季节性变化,尽管春夏季节对天气良好的信念显著更高(F = 19.46,p <.001)。季节没有显著预测意图或客观步行行为,也没有调节TPB变量对意图或行为的影响。

结论

在随机对照试验中,季节性不会影响客观测量的步行行为或心理变量。因此,试验中的身体活动行为结果不会因测量的季节而产生偏差。先前的研究可能通过选择最极端的夏季和冬季月份来评估身体活动,从而高估了季节性影响的程度。此外,招募到行为改变干预措施中的参与者可能有更高的改变动机,并且受季节性障碍的影响较小。

试验注册

当前对照试验ISRCTN95932902。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验