Suppr超能文献

为临床研究制定患者报告结局(PRO)指标的访谈:获取患者的体验

Interviewing to develop Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures for clinical research: eliciting patients' experience.

作者信息

Brédart Anne, Marrel Alexia, Abetz-Webb Linda, Lasch Kathy, Acquadro Catherine

机构信息

Mapi Research Trust, 27 rue de la Villette, 69003 Lyon, France.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Feb 5;12:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-15.

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures must provide evidence that their development followed a rigorous process for ensuring their content validity. To this end, the collection of data is performed through qualitative interviews that allow for the elicitation of in-depth spontaneous reports of the patients' experiences with their condition and/or its treatment. This paper provides a review of qualitative research applied to PRO measure development. A clear definition of what is a qualitative research interview is given as well as information about the form and content of qualitative interviews required for developing PRO measures. Particular attention is paid to the description of interviewing approaches (e.g., semi-structured and in-depth interviews, individual vs. focus group interviews). Information about how to get prepared for a qualitative interview is provided with the description of how to develop discussion guides for exploratory or cognitive interviews. Interviewing patients to obtain knowledge regarding their illness experience requires interpersonal and communication skills to facilitate patients' expression. Those skills are described in details, as well as the skills needed to facilitate focus groups and to interview children, adolescents and the elderly. Special attention is also given to quality assurance and interview training. The paper ends on ethical considerations since interviewing for the development of PROs is performed in a context of illness and vulnerability. Therefore, it is all the more important that, in addition to soliciting informed consent, respectful interactions be ensured throughout the interview process.

摘要

患者报告结局(PRO)测量必须提供证据,证明其开发过程遵循了严格的程序以确保其内容效度。为此,通过定性访谈来收集数据,这种访谈能够引出患者对其病情和/或治疗经历的深入自发报告。本文对应用于PRO测量开发的定性研究进行了综述。给出了定性研究访谈的明确定义,以及开发PRO测量所需的定性访谈的形式和内容信息。特别关注了访谈方法的描述(例如,半结构化和深入访谈、个体访谈与焦点小组访谈)。提供了关于如何为定性访谈做准备的信息,以及如何为探索性或认知访谈制定讨论指南的描述。访谈患者以获取有关其疾病经历的知识需要人际和沟通技巧,以促进患者的表达。详细描述了这些技巧,以及主持焦点小组和访谈儿童、青少年及老年人所需的技巧。还特别关注了质量保证和访谈培训。本文最后讨论了伦理考量,因为在疾病和脆弱性背景下进行PRO开发的访谈。因此,除了征求知情同意外,在整个访谈过程中确保尊重性互动就显得尤为重要。

相似文献

5
Exploring and Leveraging Known Resources to Support Pediatric Clinical Outcomes Assessment (COA) Development.
Curr Pediatr Rev. 2020;16(3):232-240. doi: 10.2174/1573396316666200331132259.
6
Using reflexivity to enhance in-depth interviewing skills for the clinician researcher.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Nov 9;8:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-73.
8
The qualitative research interview.
Med Educ. 2006 Apr;40(4):314-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x.
10
Considerations for conducting qualitative research with pediatric patients for the purpose of PRO development.
Qual Life Res. 2016 Sep;25(9):2193-9. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1256-z. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of vitreous floaters on quality of life: a qualitative study.
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Aug 18;9(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00934-w.
4
Questionnaire Translation, Adaptation, and Co-Creation of the Swedish Version of the Fear of Pain Questionnaire Child Report Short Form.
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2025 Jul 4;7(3):e70011. doi: 10.1002/pne2.70011. eCollection 2025 Sep.
8
How Are You Doing… Really? A Review of Whole Person Health Assessments.
Milbank Q. 2025 Mar;103(1):205-241. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12727. Epub 2025 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

3
Pediatric restless legs syndrome: analysis of symptom descriptions and drawings.
J Child Neurol. 2011 Nov;26(11):1365-76. doi: 10.1177/0883073811405852. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
4
Hermeneutic inquiry: insights into the process of interviewing.
Nurse Res. 2011;18(2):19-27. doi: 10.7748/nr2011.01.18.2.19.c8281.
5
Qualitative research on health communication: what can it contribute?
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Mar;82(3):384-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.021. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
6
The role of topic, interviewee and question in predicting rich interview data in the field of health research.
Sociol Health Illn. 2010 Nov;32(7):1059-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01272.x. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
7
A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments' ability to assess validity in qualitative research.
Qual Health Res. 2010 Dec;20(12):1736-43. doi: 10.1177/1049732310378656. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
8
PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation.
Qual Life Res. 2010 Oct;19(8):1087-96. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9677-6. Epub 2010 May 30.
10
Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience.
Qual Life Res. 2009 Nov;18(9):1263-78. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9. Epub 2009 Sep 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验