Suppr超能文献

大鼠纹状体中持续活动神经元的放电模式特征:与上下文相关还是物种差异?

Firing pattern characteristics of tonically active neurons in rat striatum: context dependent or species divergent?

机构信息

The Leslie and Susan Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel, and The Institute for the Study of Affective Neuroscience, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2014 Feb 5;34(6):2299-304. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1798-13.2014.

Abstract

Tonically active neurons (TANs)--presumably, striatal cholinergic interneurons--exert a strong influence on striatal information processing. Primate studies often describe a characteristic TAN response comprising suppressed activity followed by rebound firing that occasionally is preceded by a brief activation. By contrast, studies in behaving rats report pronounced excitation during movement. These differences in firing patterns may be due to variations in behavioral conditions or could stem from the fact that TANs in rodents use different neuronal mechanisms. If similar/different task conditions yield similar/different activity patterns, then the two species may share neuronal mechanisms; however, if similar task conditions yield different activity patterns, then the two species use different neuronal mechanisms. To evaluate these possibilities, we recorded TAN activity in the ventral and dorsolateral striatal regions in rats performing a simple instrumental task similar in concept to one used in primate studies. We demonstrate that TAN activity is substantially influenced by event context; yet, under identical task conditions, primate and rat TANs display similar activity patterns, whereas under different conditions they do not. Our results suggest that the observed differences in firing patterns likely reflect dissimilarities in task attributes rather than species-dependent neuronal mechanisms and call for re-evaluation of the excitatory response in primate research.

摘要

持续激活神经元(TANs)——推测是纹状体内的胆碱能中间神经元——对纹状体的信息处理有很强的影响。灵长类动物的研究经常描述了一种特征性的 TAN 反应,包括抑制性活动,随后是反弹性放电,偶尔在反弹性放电之前会有短暂的激活。相比之下,在行为大鼠中的研究报告了在运动期间明显的兴奋。这些放电模式的差异可能是由于行为条件的变化,也可能源于这样一个事实,即啮齿动物中的 TANs 使用不同的神经元机制。如果类似/不同的任务条件产生类似/不同的活动模式,那么这两个物种可能共享神经元机制;然而,如果类似的任务条件产生不同的活动模式,那么这两个物种使用不同的神经元机制。为了评估这些可能性,我们在执行与灵长类动物研究中使用的概念相似的简单工具任务的大鼠的腹侧和背外侧纹状体区域记录了 TAN 活动。我们证明 TAN 活动受到事件环境的极大影响;然而,在相同的任务条件下,灵长类和大鼠 TAN 显示出相似的活动模式,而在不同的条件下则不然。我们的结果表明,观察到的放电模式差异可能反映了任务属性的差异,而不是物种依赖性的神经元机制,并呼吁重新评估灵长类研究中的兴奋反应。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Dopamine D2 receptors modulate the cholinergic pause and inhibitory learning.多巴胺D2受体调节胆碱能暂停和抑制性学习。
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;27(3):1502-1514. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01364-y. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
8
Striatal activity topographically reflects cortical activity.纹状体活动在地形上反映了皮质活动。
Nature. 2021 Mar;591(7850):420-425. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03166-8. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验