Marche Kevin, Martel Anne-Caroline, Apicella Paul
Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, Aix Marseille UniversitéMarseille, France.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2017 Jul 24;11:52. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2017.00052. eCollection 2017.
Within the striatum, cholinergic interneurons, electrophysiologically identified as tonically active neurons (TANs), represent a relatively homogeneous group in terms of their functional properties. They display typical pause in tonic firing in response to rewarding events which are of crucial importance for reinforcement learning. These responses are uniformly distributed throughout the dorsal striatum (i.e., motor and associative striatum), but it is unknown, at least in monkeys, whether differences in the modulation of TAN activity exist in the ventral striatum (i.e., limbic striatum), a region specialized for processing of motivational information. To address this issue, we examined the activity of dorsal and ventral TANs in two monkeys trained on a Pavlovian conditioning task in which a visual stimulus preceded the delivery of liquid reward by a fixed time interval. We found that the proportion of TANs responding to the stimulus predictive of reward did not vary significantly across regions (58%-80%), whereas the fraction of TANs responding to reward was higher in the limbic striatum (100%) compared to the motor (65%) and associative striatum (52%). By examining TAN modulation at the level of both the population and the individual neurons, we showed that the duration of pause responses to the stimulus and reward was longer in the ventral than in the dorsal striatal regions. Also, the magnitude of the pause was greater in ventral than dorsal striatum for the stimulus predictive of reward but not for the reward itself. We found similar region-specific differences in pause response duration to the stimulus when the timing of reward was less predictable (fixed replaced by variable time interval). Regional variations in the duration and magnitude of the pause response were transferred from the stimulus to reward when reward was delivered in the absence of any predictive stimulus. It therefore appears that ventral TANs exhibit stronger responses to rewarding stimuli, compared to dorsal TANs. The high proportion of responsive neurons, combined with particular response features, support the notion that the ventral TAN system can be driven by specific synaptic inputs arising from afferent sources distinct from those targeting the dorsal TAN system.
在纹状体内,电生理上被鉴定为紧张性活动神经元(TANs)的胆碱能中间神经元,就其功能特性而言,代表了一个相对同质的群体。它们在对奖励事件作出反应时,其紧张性放电会出现典型的暂停,这对强化学习至关重要。这些反应在整个背侧纹状体(即运动和联合纹状体)中均匀分布,但至少在猴子中,尚不清楚在专门处理动机信息的腹侧纹状体(即边缘纹状体)中,TAN活动的调节是否存在差异。为了解决这个问题,我们在两只经过巴甫洛夫条件反射任务训练的猴子中,研究了背侧和腹侧TANs的活动,在该任务中,视觉刺激在液体奖励发放前有一个固定的时间间隔。我们发现,对预测奖励的刺激作出反应的TANs比例在不同区域之间没有显著差异(58%-80%),而与运动(65%)和联合纹状体(52%)相比,边缘纹状体中对奖励作出反应的TANs比例更高(100%)。通过在群体和单个神经元水平上研究TAN调节,我们发现腹侧对刺激和奖励的暂停反应持续时间比背侧纹状体区域更长。此外,对于预测奖励的刺激,腹侧纹状体中暂停的幅度大于背侧纹状体,但对于奖励本身则不然。当奖励时间的可预测性较低(固定时间间隔被可变时间间隔取代)时,我们发现对刺激的暂停反应持续时间也存在类似的区域特异性差异。当在没有任何预测性刺激的情况下发放奖励时,暂停反应的持续时间和幅度的区域差异会从刺激转移到奖励。因此,与背侧TANs相比,腹侧TANs似乎对奖励刺激表现出更强的反应。高比例的反应性神经元,加上特定的反应特征,支持了这样一种观点,即腹侧TAN系统可以由来自与靶向背侧TAN系统不同的传入源的特定突触输入驱动。